> Dana wrote:
> no actually I think it was the sheer stupid arrogance of this
> administration, of which Iraq was a symptom.
>
Can't disagree with you there; I never liked Bush except for the time
between 9/11 and Afghanistan.
It's just s ironic that this is an Administration that choose
ideo
> G-man wrote:
> I think America finally figured out that "fight and win" is not a
> strategy and that it's better to be prudent than merely courageous.
>
Henry IV part 1, Act 5, Scene 4:
Counterfeit? I lie, I am no counterfeit: to die, is to be a
counterfeit; for he is but the counterfeit of a m
no actually I think it was the sheer stupid arrogance of this
administration, of which Iraq was a symptom.
On 11/12/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > gMoney wrote:
> > Republican-led administration and Congress that for six years has been
> > telling working men and women and their fam
> gMoney wrote:
> Republican-led administration and Congress that for six years has been
> telling working men and women and their families in this country to shut up,
> listen up and go to hell.
>
I dunno ... I think this was almost completely about Iraq. The
President got away with selling a lo
I agree with his analysis, though I personally don't think much of Dobbs,
who is a protectionist crank of the worst sort. He might have been separated
at birth from his protectionist (and xenophobic) soul brother Pat Buchanan.
On 11/9/06, G Money wrote:
>
> From Lou Dobbs:
>
> "While the Democrat
>From Lou Dobbs:
"While the Democratic Party was the clear winner, I don't believe for even a
moment that the Democrats' ideals prevailed over Republican ideals. Election
Day was middle-class America's declaration of independence from a
Republican-led administration and Congress that for six years
