"I'm still waiting on Jerry Barnes who started this thread to respond to this
latest development :-)"
Which development?
Obama is protecting and enriching elitists while preaching the gospel of
wealth distribution. That's the only development I see that is worth
considering.
On the elitist, he
*crickets get louder*
-Original Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 6:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush
I'm still waiting on Jerry Barnes who started this thread to respond to
I'm still waiting on Jerry Barnes who started this thread to respond to
this latest development :-)
On 16 April 2012 23:55, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> *crickets chirping*
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://ww
*crickets chirping*
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:11 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush
Yep. And when they approved the Health Care act, pundits stated that
Yep. And when they approved the Health Care act, pundits stated that
polls showed that 7 out of 10 Americans didn't want it, so Congress
was going against the will of the people.
Polls today show 7 out of 10 Americans want the Buffett act. So where
were the pundits calling for Congress to compl
ginal Message-
From: Vivec [mailto:gel21...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 7:28 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush
And this is what I am talking about.
Republicans have BLOCKED (again) debate about the President's Buffet rule
w
If our government pulled back in size and scope into the limits imposed by
the constitution, our budget wouldn't be near the size it is today, ans
income tax would be a thing of the past.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> And this is what I am talking about.
>
> Republicans have
And this is what I am talking about.
Republicans have BLOCKED (again) debate about the President's Buffet rule
which would have tried to even out the disparity and the inequality.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/us/politics/buffett-rule-debate-blocked-by-republicans.html
y first time at the ball game my friend.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> Ever hear of the necessary and proper clause?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, Apr
Ever hear of the necessary and proper clause?
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 11:55 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush
The Auto bail out maybe wasn't a failure
I've spoken plainly of my dislike of the Fed here, and I agree that they
are a blight on our nations monetary policy.
That doesn't take away from the governments intervention in things it has
no business being involved in. As to economists, many of them (Harvard, U
of Chicago, Nobel winners) thi
ARRA has done some amazing things, really, but you might not have seen
them. It has, hands down, done more to modernize healthcare IT than
anything in decades. I see it because that's where I work. If I didn't
work in that field, I probably wouldn't know because it doesn't seem
to get talked about
The Auto bail out maybe wasn't a failure, but wasn't within the
constitutional powers allotted to the government in my opinion.
The ARRA didn't create anywhere near the jobs it was supposed to, and I
know you've seen the issues with the "green" companies that it supplied
with millions of dollars
In what ways do you think the auto bail out and ARRA were failures?
Judah
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Should have been more specific, had the auto bail out in mind.
>
> Not to mention the ARRA and his other bailout and "stimulous" plans.
>
> he has continued failed pro
; inherited. Of course during such a time income will be low, and if the
> >> Republicans block all attempts to adjust taxes and benefits then of
> >> course more money will flow to the wealthy, especially when Wall St.
> >> caused the collapse.
> >>
> >> Republica
#x27;t reduce income disparity in the future, but that wouldn't be
nearly as much fun as a partisan hack job of an article, so why put in
the effort, right?
Judah
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> In what shouldn't be a surprise to anyone with a pulse
>
>
>> course more money will flow to the wealthy, especially when Wall St.
>> caused the collapse.
>>
>> Republicans vehemently opposed tougher regulations on the banks as well.
>>
>> On 15 April 2012 13:03, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>> >
>>
ill be low, and if the
> Republicans block all attempts to adjust taxes and benefits then of
> course more money will flow to the wealthy, especially when Wall St.
> caused the collapse.
>
> Republicans vehemently opposed tougher regulations on the banks as well.
>
> On 15 April 2012
h of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush (
> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/growth-of-income-inequality-is-worse-under-obama-than-bush.html)
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.am
Yes, but what will replace it?
Also, should we even be using a federal reserve note? A piece of paper,
from a private bank, with no material backing?
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:4
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it
> can bribe the public with the public's money.
>
The Federal Reserve Note will be a piece of history soon.
~~
at shouldn't be a surprise to anyone with a pulse
>
> Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush (
>
> http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/growth-of-income-inequality-is-worse-under-obama-than-bush.html
> )
>
> Yesterday, the President gave a speech in wh
In what shouldn't be a surprise to anyone with a pulse
Growth of Income Inequality Is Worse Under Obama than Bush (
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/04/growth-of-income-inequality-is-worse-under-obama-than-bush.html)
Yesterday, the President gave a speech in which he demanded that Con
23 matches
Mail list logo
