Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-26 Thread Loathe
top Erika L. Walker wrote: > I like the middle one. > > >>> : -Original Message- >>> : From: Jim Davis >>> : >>> : http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg > > > > ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwa

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-26 Thread Erika L. Walker
I like the middle one. >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Jim Davis >>: >>: http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Dana
/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg > > > > Jim Davis > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Greg Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:16 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: Ho

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread William Bowen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:16 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > > > > page cannot be found, dude > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 a

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Jim Davis
Oops - thanks. Here's the good one: http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg Jim Davis > -Original Message- > From: Greg Morphis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 10:16 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How's this o

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Greg Morphis
page cannot be found, dude On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well - here's a set for comparison: > > http://www.depressedpress.com/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg > > I'm not going to get into how they're different since I don't want to offer > any opinions but w

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Jim Davis
Well - here's a set for comparison: http://www.depressedpress.com/Quarks/Quarks_Drafts.jpg I'm not going to get into how they're different since I don't want to offer any opinions but which do you guys think is the best? Jim Davis ~~~

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Erika L. Walker
I would never call your children ugly! :D I like it now. My eye kept going to the apostrophe. It was all I could see. It was glowing and big and bright and hurting my eyes. MY EYES MY EYES! Now it's lovely! Yes I like it. You did a great job! Your children are beautiful! >>: -Original

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-25 Thread Loathe
Ignore the haters, I love it. Jim Davis wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:02 AM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) >> >&

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:09 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > also... the stardate looks wrong I need to research that more..

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 1:02 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > never underestimate my capacity to be picky :) Judith and I just had a

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Dana
> > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:35 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > > > > > no you can't :) > > > > Damn...

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Dana
you doing this on a path in Photoshop? On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:35 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: H

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:35 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > no you can't :) Damn... well, then - try this one: http://www

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Dana
2008 10:24 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > > > Shouldn't the apostrophe go the other way? > > Can't we call it "artistic license"? ;^) > > Jim Davis > > > ~~

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:24 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again) > > Shouldn't the apostrophe go the other way? Can't we

Re: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Dana
yes it should On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shouldn't the apostrophe go the other way? > > >>: -Original Message- > >>: From: Jim Davis > >>: > >>: http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks.jpg > > > ~

RE: How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Erika L. Walker
Shouldn't the apostrophe go the other way? >>: -Original Message- >>: From: Jim Davis >>: >>: http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks.jpg ~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic r

How's this one look? (Deep Space Nine fans, again)

2008-03-24 Thread Jim Davis
My skills don't extend to matching the exact form of the "Cheers" one, but I'm pretty pleased with this: http://www.depressedpress.com/Test/Quarks/Quarks.jpg I think it's close enough to be recognizable... am I being naïve? Opinions? Thanks, Jim Davis