Thanks!
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:07:49 -0600, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's like font-family but for speech. It's intended to support
> non-visual browsers by providing different voices to give a different
> flavor to certain pieces of text. Much like you'd use times for body
> text
It's like font-family but for speech. It's intended to support
non-visual browsers by providing different voices to give a different
flavor to certain pieces of text. Much like you'd use times for body
text then a large, bold, sans-serif for a callout or nav area.
Unfortunately, no browsers (that
What's a voice-family ?
- Frank
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:57:16 -0500, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mind critiquing my first real CSS layout attempt at
>
> http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/index.htm
>
> any and all comments about the page are welcome.
>
> thx,
>
> larry
>
I have not experienced any of that. I've not had any problems with
DWMX 7.01. Mind you I've not bothered with the Design view, staying
strictly with the code view and using a browser for viewing the
finished page.
larry
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:08:54 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> You must have a better I than I do, I couldn't get it to do that in
> Firefox 1.0.
Not necessarily a better eye, just a higher latency and a cache set to always
validate the original.
Jochem
~|
Protect
Oh..because I found out the hard way that design view in Dreamweaver MX seldom
works with CSS site layouts with the DIV tags etc.
:-\
Strangely enough, DW 6 seems to edit the pages just fine, while 7.0.1 can't
make sense of it.
I really think it is usually much too long between releases for DWMX
You must have a better I than I do, I couldn't get it to do that in Firefox 1.0.
larry
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:06:31 -0400, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> >
> > I'm still experimenting with the page. The flash to white is happening
> > because of an IE glit
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I'm still experimenting with the page. The flash to white is happening
> because of an IE glitch with CSS images. Probably something like
> dynamically positioning will solve that problem.
Happens on Firefox too (but only once for the first menu item).
Jochem
~
thanks jerry.
I'm still experimenting with the page. The flash to white is happening
because of an IE glitch with CSS images. Probably something like
dynamically positioning will solve that problem.
larry
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:59:35 -0500, Jerry Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to
thx.
larry
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:01:31 -0400, Jochem van Dieten
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> > Mind critiquing my first real CSS layout attempt at
> > http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/index.htm
> > any and all comments about the page are welcome.
>
> If I change the font
i used the codeview in Dreamweaver MX 2004. But it could also have
been HS+ etc.
larry
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:22:05 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks nice.
>
> How do you edit the site? In Dreamweaver or in a code only solution like
> Homesite or CF Studio?
>
> -Gel
>
It looks nice.
How do you edit the site? In Dreamweaver or in a code only solution like
Homesite or CF Studio?
-Gel
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffu
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Mind critiquing my first real CSS layout attempt at
> http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/index.htm
> any and all comments about the page are welcome.
If I change the font size the blue bar starts behaving funny.
Jochem
~~~
You need to use SMALLER words. Even the "Lorem Ipsum" is easier to understand
than "restricted isovolumic cochrane graviton-prediction"
=)
I don't like the flash-to-white when hovering over a blue menu item on the left.
I would like a touch of right gutter in the main content window.
I would lik
Hi,
Mind critiquing my first real CSS layout attempt at
http://www.lyonsmorris.com/test/index.htm
any and all comments about the page are welcome.
thx,
larry
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Troubl
That's exactly what I needed. Thanks
FA looked kind of bad on IE in many cases and this helps it greatly.
> There is a know bug in IE when using em's for font-sizing. The fix is to
> create an initial parent that is sized with percent usually the body or
> something like that. After that one can
The sizes seemed to have been giving me a problem when combined with inline.
> Huh? What about IE doesn't allow you to alter H1/H2, etc?
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:14:13 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeh, that's a problem with IE. It does not allow you to alter the
There is a know bug in IE when using em's for font-sizing. The fix is to
create an initial parent that is sized with percent usually the body or
something like that. After that one can use em's to correctly size fonts.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
You tried using IE7? :)
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeh, that's a problem with IE. It does not allow you to alter the H1/H2 etc.
tags and make them inline or change their size. Nasty. I'm going to have to
remove them and alter sizes across
Thank you. It seems that if you just do a 'display: inline' for an H element
in CSS, IE has problems. If you put in a font-size of 100%, then it comes
out properly. Now it looks better in IE.
I'll alter things for it.
> Ummm, this code works just fine for me in IE 5.5? Is there something else
>
Huh? What about IE doesn't allow you to alter H1/H2, etc?
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:14:13 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeh, that's a problem with IE. It does not allow you to alter the H1/H2 etc.
> tags and make them inline or change their size. Nasty. I'm going to have to
> r
Ummm, this code works just fine for me in IE 5.5? Is there something else you
are trying to do?
Untitled Document
h1 {
display: inline;
font-size: 200%;
}
h2 {
display: inline;
font-size: 50%;
Yeh, that's a problem with IE. It does not allow you to alter the H1/H2 etc.
tags and make them inline or change their size. Nasty. I'm going to have to
remove them and alter sizes across the board. And margins as Jochem
mentioned.
> Hmm...I think the text font size is too big. Should be smaller,
Hmm...I think the text font size is too big. Should be smaller, it makes
everything lookgarish (IE 6).
Other than that, it's a simple design. So not much can be done with it unless
you wanted to get more complicated.
The colors look ok.
-Gel
~~
I've added 2 of his books to my amazon wish list. I've got a birthday next week
so I'll probably treat myself to those and maybe something else from the list.
Maybe spur me to get that book review section of HoF back up. :)
> CSS layouts are here. Spend some time with an Eric Meyer book or two
>
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> OK, this is an actual live representation of the new layout.
> http://fusionauthority.com/test3.cfm
What I dislike is the number of columns: 5 is too many. Depending on how many
featured articles you intend to have vs. nrmal articles I think you should
consider having y
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> It's easier to design in tables and then break a brain or two to get it
> into proper CSS.
I have to disagree with you here.
It is easier to design a semantic structure first. If you have a proper
semantic structure, several presentation issues follow from that naturall
OK, this is an actual live representation of the new layout.
http://fusionauthority.com/test3.cfm
Needs:
1. CSS conversion
2. Shrinking logo to 120x120 to fit with CSS
3. add margins
4. connect links
5. news section headers
The changes to make the same work for HoF are even less.
~~
It's easier to design in tables and then break a brain or two to get it into
proper CSS.
On the whole, looking at the people who come to the site, they want the
content and don't care all that much about how the layout was created. Out
of about 20k unique people (non-bots) a day, I can say that 1/
No offense, but I think you're missing the mark entirely. Your
audience is very tech-savvy but you're using 90's layout techniques,
namely tables. I personally I find the new design clumsy and ugly, but
I know you've never claimed to be a designer. Aesthetics aside though,
if you're going through t
This is exactly what I need.
The header image might be to large which is throwing you. I'll shrink it
some. Are you sure the FA letters don't line up on bottom? They should,
though the image is aligned to the top which may look strange.
When you say the banner competes for attention from the text,
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> OK, I think this is close to the finished product.
> http://fusionauthority.com/test2.htm
>
> Smaller banner area and larger content area, 1 option for a
> graphic banner, cleaner code, less images and an all around
> tighter layout. I've go
OK, I think this is close to the finished product.
http://fusionauthority.com/test2.htm
Smaller banner area and larger content area, 1 option for a graphic banner,
cleaner code, less images and an all around tighter layout. I've gotten both
good and bad reviews of the new header with white abov
I am talking about the blue/white area to the far right. the left
margin of that could stand to be a couple pixels wider imho.
Also, while I am critiquing, is there supposed to be a curled upper
left corner on the FA logo? If so it's slightly overlapped by the atom
graphic and it's a bit confusing
Inside the blue or outside it?
I'm going to try to shrink down the logo size a bit as it's too eye
catching. Might pull away from the content. It's the same dimensions as the
older logo but less 'fluff' around it. It's actually smaller in file size
though.
> I think the ads could use a few pixels
I think the ads could use a few pixels of breathing space on the left.
imho
Dana
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:05:45 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at this one. I think it's getting a lot closer to what I want:
> http://fusionauthority.com/test1.htm
> To do includes removing
Look at this one. I think it's getting a lot closer to what I want:
http://fusionauthority.com/test1.htm
To do includes removing the bottom gradient and replacing it with a dark
purple bar with the copyright info. That will give a nice framing of the
content.
Ads are in 3 areas. Top (part of the t
37 matches
Mail list logo
