Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-11 Thread Dana
TED] > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:10 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Onward to Iran > > Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to > reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's > pretty scary > > On Thu, 10 Mar 200

RE: Onward to Iran

2005-03-11 Thread John Stanley
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:10 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Onward to Iran Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's pretty scary On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:31:27 -0400, Andrew Grosset <[EMAIL

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-11 Thread Dana
Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's pretty scary On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:31:27 -0400, Andrew Grosset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is an interesting opinion here about the demise of the American do

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-11 Thread Kevin Graeme
Bush Announces Iraq Exit Strategy: "We'll Go Through Iran" http://www.onion.com/news/index.php?issue=4110 -Kevin ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.c

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-10 Thread Andrew Grosset
There is an interesting opinion here about the demise of the American dollar (from :http://www.energybulletin.net/4634.html ) [quote] Iran will move a step closer to establishing its much-publicized oil exchange next week, when the Oil Ministry and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance ar

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-09 Thread Dana
articles position? > > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:15 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Onward to Iran > > This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and the > middle east

RE: Onward to Iran

2005-03-09 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:11 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Onward to Iran > > Why must objectivity use dull language? For instance, which is the > more objective phrase: Well - I

RE: Onward to Iran

2005-03-09 Thread John Stanley
okay, this scares me. anyone have any points to make about the validity of the articles position? -Original Message- From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:15 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Onward to Iran This article should be read by anyone

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-09 Thread Kevin Graeme
Why must objectivity use dull language? For instance, which is the more objective phrase: 1. Project for the New American Century 2. A century of violence and American expansionism. Version 2 actually explains version 1, but uses "loaded" (i.e. descriptive) words. -Kevin On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:2

RE: Onward to Iran

2005-03-09 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Rob Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 1:28 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Onward to Iran > > What a hack job. Well - "Hack Job" may (may!) be a little harsh, but phrases like &quo

Re: Onward to Iran

2005-03-08 Thread Rob Munn
What a hack job. - Original Message - From: "Andrew Grosset" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:14 PM Subject: Onward to Iran > This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and

Onward to Iran

2005-03-08 Thread Andrew Grosset
This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and the middle east http://www.energybulletin.net/4634.html ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http: