TED]
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:10 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Onward to Iran
>
> Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to
> reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's
> pretty scary
>
> On Thu, 10 Mar 200
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 9:10 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Onward to Iran
Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to
reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's
pretty scary
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:31:27 -0400, Andrew Grosset <[EMAIL
Yes. It sounds reasonable though I don't have enough background to
reaslly endorse it. Part of why I agree with John that yes, it's
pretty scary
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:31:27 -0400, Andrew Grosset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is an interesting opinion here about the demise of the American do
Bush Announces Iraq Exit Strategy: "We'll Go Through Iran"
http://www.onion.com/news/index.php?issue=4110
-Kevin
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.c
There is an interesting opinion here about the demise of the American dollar
(from :http://www.energybulletin.net/4634.html )
[quote]
Iran will move a step closer to establishing its much-publicized oil exchange
next week, when the Oil Ministry and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and
Finance ar
articles position?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:15 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Onward to Iran
>
> This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and the
> middle east
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 9:11 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Onward to Iran
>
> Why must objectivity use dull language? For instance, which is the
> more objective phrase:
Well - I
okay, this scares me. anyone have any points to make about the validity of
the articles position?
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Grosset [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Onward to Iran
This article should be read by anyone
Why must objectivity use dull language? For instance, which is the
more objective phrase:
1. Project for the New American Century
2. A century of violence and American expansionism.
Version 2 actually explains version 1, but uses "loaded" (i.e.
descriptive) words.
-Kevin
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 03:2
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 1:28 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Onward to Iran
>
> What a hack job.
Well - "Hack Job" may (may!) be a little harsh, but phrases like &quo
What a hack job.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Grosset" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:14 PM
Subject: Onward to Iran
> This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and
This article should be read by anyone concerned with energy supplies and the
middle east
http://www.energybulletin.net/4634.html
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http:
12 matches
Mail list logo