+1
On 4/21/05, Irvin Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That type of layout is easily accomplished with a simple table. An all-div
> solution is just a > pain in the neck.
>
> It's always useful to remember that there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with
> using a table > as a layout grid. It valida
That type of layout is easily accomplished with a simple table. An all-div
solution is just a pain in the neck.
It's always useful to remember that there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with using
a table as a layout grid. It validates, is accessible and renders fine in all
browsers.
> I have our
That type of layout is easily accomplished with a simple table. An all-div
solution is just a pain in the neck.
It's always useful to remember that there's absolutely NOTHING wrong with using
a table as a layout grid. It validates, is accessible and renders fine in all
browsers.
> I have our
On 4/21/05, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Semantically is another story. To get the curved corners found in the
> original [2], I had to use a lot of contextually valueless images. I am not
> very satisfied with this, so I'm looking for any viable alternatives.
>
This is one of m
I have our new CSS based prototype [1] looking like our
designer/marketing/branding specifications, as represented in our current
website [2]; but only in Firefox. I already know I have a serious problem in
IE 5.5 and 6 that I am trying to figure out. Advice would be gratefully
accepted. I w
