-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
I think you need a search/replace:
where = were
excepted = accepted
If the two above aren't true, the
Read up on how American POW's were treated before making such a statement.
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
You
I think you need a search/replace:
where = were
excepted = accepted
If the two above aren't true, then I'm thoroughly baffled.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Ousterhout"
> Gel,
> The question remains, do POW's have the same rights as others? In a
> traditional war, "soldiers
Gel,
The question remains, do POW's have the same rights as others? In a
traditional war, "soldiers" where clearly defined by their uniforms. Spies
where soldiers out of uniform. Civilians where everyone else. Very
simplistic, but useful for this discussion. It was well excepted that
captured
When you're good, you're expected to exceed the common.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:32 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
If I remember right (and I've been proven wrong about just recalling things
more than once) there was some debate about that one too, apparently one o
real war
crimes court.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> Not in plain clothes it doesn&#x
their being in the
weirmacht should have accorded them POW status.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:42 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to
Raymond Camden wrote:
> I wasn't speaking about once case, but about Nazi, German soldiers in
> general. Would it be fair to say that, in general, the Germans were given
> POW status, and the high commanders were given trials at Nuremburg(forgive
> the spelling, to busy to look it up).
Yes. And wi
Thank you John, for being the "cooler head" that needed to prevail
here..
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:08 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
it'
lol
-Original Message-
From: brobborb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2004 14:46
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
Can you also retract the comment on the idiot comment. It's insulting to
i
-
> From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> You know, after thinking about it, how is this different than
> the POW that w
sday, April 20, 2004 9:52 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> I started.
>
> Sorry guys. Just can't believe that this comparison can even be made.
>
> --
> Timothy Heald
> Web Portfolio Manage
-
> From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 7:55 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
> Ray,
>
> The case in which the German saboteurs were condemned to
> death is very
weirmacht should have accorded them POW status.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:42 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> I
bject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
Adam,
I don't think that personal insult is called for.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:21 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subjec
which by the way is fine with me.
-Original Message-
From: John Stanley
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>> but didn't we give the Nazis a fair trial
not a
m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2004 14:29
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> We're beating and torturing people? Killing prisoners?
>
>
> How dare you compare the one to the other. We p
Adam,
I don't think that personal insult is called for.
larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:21 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
Can you also retract the comment on the idiot comment. It's insulting to idiots!!!
- Original Message -
From: Adam Reynolds
To: CF-Community
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 8:32 AM
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
I retract the
TECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> You know, after thinking about it, how is this different than
> the POW that were held in Vietnam?
>
> Isn't
They are comparing the act of holding the people prisoner indefinitely
with no legal representation.
And there have been several reports of prisoner abuse in Guantanamo bay.
Two men that were released spoke extensively about the abuses they saw
in numerous press conferences.
Do you honestly thin
I retract the idiot comment.
Tim calling somebody a retard isn't nice and is insulting to the mentally
handicapped.
Adam
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
TED]
> Sent: 20 April 2004 14:29
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> We're beating and torturing people? Killing prisoners?
>
>
> How dare you compare the one to the other. We provide
>
Yuck. This post got totally messed up :-)
"After U.S. forces attacked al-Qaeda and its Taliban protectors in
October 2001, thousands of prisoners were swept up amid the fighting
across Afghanistan More than two years later, nearly 600
captives remain jailed in a military prison built at Guantana
Wow. Now that's a cool comparison.
Comparing the United States actions, to those of the Vietnamese.
That was the point of the article btw. That America, so proud of its
democracy , transparency and notions of fairness and justice can now be
compared to communist countries.
-Gel
-Origi
, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2004 14:29
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
We're beating and torturing people? Killing prisoners?
How dare you compare the one to the other. We provide health care,
religious services and
: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
We're beating and torturing people? Killing prisoners?
How dare you compare the one to the other. We provide health care,
religious services and food and shelter. We do not
ified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
You know, after thinking about it, how is this diff
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
You know, after thinking about it, how is this different than the POW
that were held in Vietnam?
Isn't American doing the same thing that the
You know, after thinking about it, how is this different than the POW
that were held in Vietnam?
Isn't American doing the same thing that the Vietnamese did?
-Original Message-
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject:
Yeah, they were covering this quite a bit this morning on NPR. Very
interesting
-Original Message-
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
"After U.S. forces a
33 matches
Mail list logo
