Teflon man, teflon.
On 2/23/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He'll win as VP and one bullet and a suicide note later ... :)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197977
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion
He'll win as VP and one bullet and a suicide note later ... :)
On 2/23/06, Robert Munn wrote:
> Man, Clinton wouldn't be running as VP, he'd want the top job again. And the
> sick thing is he'd probably win.
>
> >Did you notice all but one are Democrats?
> >Under this resolution Bush would not b
Man, Clinton wouldn't be running as VP, he'd want the top job again. And the
sick thing is he'd probably win.
>Did you notice all but one are Democrats?
>Under this resolution Bush would not be eligible to run for a third
>term, but Clinton would be allowed to become vice-president.
>
>
>On 2/23
Did you notice all but one are Democrats?
Under this resolution Bush would not be eligible to run for a third
term, but Clinton would be allowed to become vice-president.
On 2/23/06, Maureen wrote:
> 109th CONGRESS
>
> 1st Session
>
> H. J. RES. 24
>
> Proposing an amendment to the Constitution o
Like that will happen before 2008. Noone in this country wants another FDR or
Huey Long (if he hadn't been assisinated, he would have been president) like
dynasty. Plus this bill has as much chance of passing as HR 163 of the 108th
Congress.
Universal National Service Act of 2003 (Introduced
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 24
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to
repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 17, 2005
Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and
Mr. PALLONE) introd
You are aware that a bill was introduced recently to repeal the 22nd
amendment, aren't you?
On 2/21/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reading all of the anti-Bush sentiment here I seem to think everyone has
> forgtten there is a Twenty Second Amendment to the Costitution of the Unit
Why the mention of the people then, when that is always used to represent an
individual right?
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
&g
ou could support the parts you don't like (2nd, 10th) the way
> you support the parts you do.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:40 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject:
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
>
> > I'm quite familiar with Mr. Wright's history. In one way he sounds
> > paranoid, but given what he's been through with DFGW, he may be
> > correct to sound paranoid. They have raided his h
nesday, February 22, 2006 9:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
>
> So you have no problems with government bureaucracy ignoring
> search warents and court orders etc. The government is always right.
> Bureaucracy uber alles.
>
> What the hey
ebruary 22, 2006 7:22 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
>
> As Spock said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of
> the few, or the one."
>
> >So you have no problems with the Dept of Fish, Game and
> Wildlife acting
Larry,
People don't want to be free anymore. Haven't you figured that out?
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:16 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
>
> S
You lost me. Due process was followed as far as I can see. The government got a
warrant, went to his house, and took away his ferrets.
I'm still trying to digest the fact that you are defending a paranoid freak
whose main issue is ferrets.
>So you have no problems with government bureaucracy
> I'm quite familiar with Mr. Wright's history. In one way he sounds
> paranoid, but given what he's been through with DFGW, he may be
> correct to sound paranoid. They have raided his house numerous times,
> slandered and harassed him.
According to his own statement the harrassment was a two-way
far as the California ferret statutes go, they're not based in scientific
fact nor are they in line with the rest of the country.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 11:39 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Anti Bush senti
> So you have no problems with the Dept of Fish, Game and Wildlife
> acting like jackbooted storm troopers kicking down private law abiding
> citizen's doors.
ermmm... law abiding? In California, ferrets are verboten, thus no law
abider he.
> No due process involved,
His statement includes the w
Nope, no more than I do having animal control confiscating other types of
banned animals.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 7:16 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Anti Bush sentiment here
So you have no problems with the
So you have no problems with government bureaucracy ignoring search
warents and court orders etc. The government is always right.
Bureaucracy uber alles.
What the hey, the constitution is just a piece of paper anyways.
larry
On 2/22/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Spock said, "Th
Spock was a putz.
On 2/22/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Spock said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the
> one."
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:197713
Archiv
As Spock said, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the
one."
>So you have no problems with the Dept of Fish, Game and Wildlife
>acting like jackbooted storm troopers kicking down private law abiding
>citizen's doors. No due process involved, with arbitrary rules with no
>righ
I'm quite familiar with Mr. Wright's history. In one way he sounds
paranoid, but given what he's been through with DFGW, he may be
correct to sound paranoid. They have raided his house numerous times,
slandered and harassed him. There has been some very bad blood between
the dept and Wright, to suc
So you have no problems with the Dept of Fish, Game and Wildlife
acting like jackbooted storm troopers kicking down private law abiding
citizen's doors. No due process involved, with arbitrary rules with no
right of appeal.
right.
larry
On 2/21/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactl
> Exactly my point. California is in a multi-billion dollar fiscal hole, and
> this guy wants to
> campaign for ferret rights. Talk about misplaced priorities.
I love the idea of the Libertarian party is the party of
self-interest, it seems so absolutely American; but if the Libs are
ever going t
Exactly my point. California is in a multi-billion dollar fiscal hole, and this
guy wants to campaign for ferret rights. Talk about misplaced priorities.
>If you're talking about Pat Wright, he was a legitimate candidate.
>He's been a long time activist for the rights of ferret owners in
>Califor
If you're talking about Pat Wright, he was a legitimate candidate.
He's been a long time activist for the rights of ferret owners in
California. Owning a ferret is currently illegal in the state. He
became involved after the Department of Fish Game and Wildlife raided
his house and later had his pe
I was registered as a Libertarian until the recall election that brought in
Schwarzeneggar. On the recall ballot, in the little space where each candidate
gets to list a one-liner slogan, the Libertarian candidate's read, "legalize
ferret farming", or something very close to that. A serious poli
27 matches
Mail list logo
