Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
um like make it more costly?
(I don't see how this equates with less safe, either)
excerpted from the article
But the law will change our cars. The auto industry pointed out, to
no
avail, that the measure would make cars even more expensive and
pressure
Aren't you guys the ones that say: Life's tough, get a helmet.
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
They are saying that smaller cars that don't use as much
No.
-Original Message-
From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 11:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
Aren't you guys the ones that say: Life's tough, get a helmet.
Adam
That was Denis Leary
~~
Stephenie
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:33 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
No.
-Original Message-
From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
CO2, the stuff plants need to live.
So, I guess Davis wants to kill all the trees and plants in the states
also. The CO2 is converted into O2 for us humans to live.
So, I guess by killing the plants, grass, and trees, Davis just signed
every ones death warrant in Californian...
Thanks
CO2 - the gas we naturally exhale, which would be
naturally inhaled by plants and trees, in turn exhaling
the oxygen we need, had we not cut so many of them down.
CO - already heavily restricted in vehicle emissions.
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/7/22/192020
could be worse. could be methane restrictions.
Man arrested for breaking wind in own home; Claims 3 egg omlette was to
blame.
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:25 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: CO2 Restrictions
I'm no expert, but I think the amount of emitted CO2 correlates pretty well
with the amount of poisonous gasses emitted. In other words, it would be
pretty hard to emit a bunch of poisonous gas without emitting a bunch of CO2
as well. Instead of making it complicated by limiting each poisonous
/do your best Homer Simpson imitation and say:
lousy democrats
~~
Stephenie
-Original Message-
From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:40 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CO2 Restrictions
CO2, the stuff plants need to live.
So, I guess Davis wants
- Original Message -
From: Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: CO2 Restrictions
CO2, the stuff plants need to live.
So, I guess Davis wants to kill all the trees and plants in the states
also. The CO2 is converted
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: CO2 Restrictions
CO2, the stuff plants need to live.
So, I guess Davis wants to kill all the trees and plants in the states
also. The CO2 is converted into O2 for us humans to live.
So, I guess
: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:58 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
I'm no expert, but I think the amount of emitted CO2 correlates pretty well
with the amount of poisonous gasses emitted. In other words, it would be
pretty hard to emit
954.360.9022 X159
ICQ 417645
- Original Message -
From: Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: CO2 Restrictions
CO2, the stuff plants need to live.
So, I guess Davis wants to kill all the trees and plants
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
Adam,
Thank you for your enlightening comments on this. I hate the way that
articles like the one that was quoted are presented with as little
context
as possible in order , in my opinion
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
Are you saying that this article and my posting of the link would cause
some sort of flame war?
Perish the thought.
I just thought it was funny the lay put restrictions on one the least
harmful gases
Cantrell, Adam wrote:
I'm no expert, but I think the amount of emitted CO2 correlates pretty well
with the amount of poisonous gasses emitted. In other words, it would be
pretty hard to emit a bunch of poisonous gas without emitting a bunch of CO2
as well. Instead of making it complicated by
such a big hissy fit over it.
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 2:29 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: CO2 Restrictions
Cantrell, Adam wrote:
I'm no expert, but I think the amount of emitted CO2
correlates
Cantrell, Adam wrote:
So decreasing the CO2 emissions could very well
lead to higher NOx emissions.
But as you said, this would only be the case if they tried meeting the
regulation by increasing engine temps right?
Yes.
I think the new standards are
going to require automakers to
Don't get me wrong, I have little enough money to throw around, and I hate
the thought of spending more on anything. I also enjoy a cheap laugh at the
expense of Californians anyday! :-)
Here Here!
start soapbox
But let's be honest, our world's obsession with cars makes the Internet
tech
Hey, there is always The Ozbournes :)
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:35 PM
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
Don't get me wrong, I have little enough
Woops.Wrong thread :)
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Nick McClure [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:35 PM
Subject: RE: CO2 Restrictions
Don't get me wrong, I have little enough money to throw
21 matches
Mail list logo
