Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Casey Dougall
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Medic wrote: > Time to cull the herd. > Stockpile those MRE's, water and ammunition... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dino

RE: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Eric Roberts
[mailto:ks...@gckschools.com] Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:16 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Canada debates public health care model >Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt. > >On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote: >> J Oh it gets be

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Given that Canada has little or no federal deficit in comparison to the US and has weather the financial crisis much better than most of the rest of the industrialized countries, I think the comparison to such lame ducks is incorrect. If anything the US and Japan will go under long before Canada w

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Jerry Barnes
"Gonna be an interesting century indeed." Shotguns are great for home defense. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Arch

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Kris Sisk
>Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt. > >On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote: >> J Oh it gets better. On top of nations self destructing due to screw ups by politicians we're gonna be out of oil long before the end of this century. We get to figure ou

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread LRS Scout
Gonna be an interesting century of that there can be no doubt. On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:42 -0400, Jerry Barnes wrote: > J ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Din

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Jerry Barnes
"next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan, and every other industrialized nation" Frightening, isn't it? "we're on the road to self-destruction and our political class has no idea how to keep it from happening." Ahh, but to they know how they got here? Obviously no

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Medic
Time to cull the herd. On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Robert Munn wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > > > "and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..." > > > > See Greece. > > next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan, > and ev

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-03 Thread Robert Munn
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..." > > See Greece. next Portugal, then Spain and Italy, then Britain, US, Canada, Japan, and every other industrialized nation. we're on the road to self-destruction and our political class ha

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread Jerry Barnes
"and so we see how civilizations self-destruct..." See Greece. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread Robert Munn
and so we see how civilizations self-destruct... On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:58 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote: > > > So yes, the problem is in the usage - based on the Robin Hood > mentality of the planners at the time, there are too many users and > not enough providers.  Personally the failure is

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread C. Hatton Humphrey
>> The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't >> having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people. >> Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming >> in. The number of children couples have has been in decline for 50 y

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread Vivec
No no wait... Are the two of your Serious??? you have to be kidding! On 2 June 2010 10:06, Medic wrote: >> Is this a serious post, or are you just kidding? > > Is *THIS* a serious post or are *YOU* just kidding? ~| Order the A

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread Medic
> > Is this a serious post, or are you just kidding? > Is *THIS* a serious post or are *YOU* just kidding? ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/143027

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread G Money
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Medic wrote: > > The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't > having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people. > Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming > in. The number of child

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-02 Thread Medic
The problem isn't the healthcare system. The problem is that people aren't having as many kids. Too many old people. Not enough young people. Disproportionate streams mean there's more leaving the kitty than is coming in. The number of children couples have has been in decline for 50 years. In Can

Re: Canada debates public health care model

2010-06-01 Thread Jerry Barnes
Coming soon to a democratic republic near you: Soaring costs force Canada to reassess health model Pressured by an aging population and the need to rein in budget deficits, Canada's provinces are taking tough measures to curb healthcare costs, a trend that could erode the principles of the popula