good point. But even if you believe we SHOULD be there... it's still
not responsive
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 12:46:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Pampered Bush meets a real reporter
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
> What answer would you like? Pretend you can answer for
> Bush and lets here what the answer should be.
The real point is that we shouldn't be there in the first place, and
so there would not need to be any answering for our being there. Once
he decided we were going in, there were no good answer
. Maybe it would have
been better to simply say that casualties are sometimes necessary...
Dana
- Original Message -
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Pampered Bush meets a real reporter
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh yes O'Reilly is fair and balanced. BTW what are you smoking and can
I get some of it? Calling O'Reilly fair and balanced is like calling
F*** You Dick Cheney someone who doesn't swear. Or like calling the
Republican Party the party of the poor. In other words you've totally
sucked up the right w
Rush a genius? Rush fair?
What color is the sun on your planet?
Michael Moore would eat his lunch, and I'd pay to see it.
Rush is a bigoted, drug addled neocon idiot. And dangerous, because people
like you actually place validity on his spin.
Do you really think you're getting the truth about
At 12:20 AM 6/30/04, Sam wrote:
>Yes actually. People don't like war answers the
>question. Then he goes on explain how bad things
>were...
If Bush had presented the facts of the brutality of Saddam's reign to the
American people and used that as the rationale for war, then his sob story
of the
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you consider the following particularly
> responsive?
Yes actually. People don't like war answers the
question. Then he goes on explain how bad things
were...
What answer would you like? Pretend you can answer for
Bush and lets here what the answer
Do you consider the following particularly responsive?
Q And they're angry over Iraq, as well, and particularly the
continuing death toll there.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I can understand that. People don't like war. But
what they should be angry about is the fact that there was a brutal
dictator ther
Subject: Re: Pampered Bush meets a real reporter
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Interesting, what I consider rude you call a serious
journalism.
They didn't mention this interview was posted on the
White house Web site.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040625-2.ht
And if you didn't also cut him off, you would see the
answer he was trying to give. He wasn't evading the
question or changing the subject.
"On September the 11th, 2001, we were attacked in an
unprovoked fashion. Everybody thought the world was
calm. And then there have been bombings since then --
I just want to say to Rush Limbaugh that I appreciate all he's done to
bolster the sacred institution of heterosexual marriage in our great,
God-fearing nation.
- Jim
Sam Morris wrote:
>Interesting, what I consider rude you call a serious
>journalism.
>
>They didn't mention this interview was
I don't consider that rude, I consider that a journalists job, to stop
someone from evading an issue and to get an answer to a question that was
asked. Just cause American journalists aren't doing that doesn't mean it
shouldn't be done.
_
From: Marlon Moyer
Case in point:
Q But, Mr. P
Case in point:
Q But, Mr. President, the world is a more dangerous place today. I
don't know whether you can see that or not.
THE PRESIDENT: Why do you say that?
Q There are terrorist bombings every single day. It's now a daily
event. It wasn't like that two years ago.
THE PRESIDENT: What was
It might have been rude, but when someone evades the questions and
tries to move the subject, that's what you've got to do.
Besides, he didn't need to act like a teenager in his response to her.
Bush could definitely use some tact lessons.
Marlon
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:12:48 -0700 (PDT), Sam Mo
Interesting, what I consider rude you call a serious
journalism.
They didn't mention this interview was posted on the
White house Web site.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/06/20040625-2.html
Read the actual interview and tell me if he would
answer the questions or couldn't.
-sam
"I
15 matches
Mail list logo
