Whatever you choose, when you receive your new RAM always get the latest
version of memtest86 and run it against your new RAM for at least a night. If
it shows any errors, send it back.
Jochem
~|
Get help! RoboHelp
http://www.h
Thanks Jochem.
Yves
On 4/14/05, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yves Arsenault wrote:
> > Has anyone had "super" or "horrible" experiences with certain types of RAM?
> >
> > Mainly, would anyone like to share about Registered RAM?
>
> Always use registered ECC RAM for servers. Int
In style...
;-)
Yves
On 4/14/05, James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I want some of this...
>
> http://www.crucial.com/uk/ballistix/content.asp?key=tracer
>
> But not sure I can justify the cost. ;-)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yves Arsenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Personally I want some of this...
http://www.crucial.com/uk/ballistix/content.asp?key=tracer
But not sure I can justify the cost. ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Yves Arsenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 14 April 2005 01:29
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RAM question
>
> Has an
Yves Arsenault wrote:
> Has anyone had "super" or "horrible" experiences with certain types of RAM?
>
> Mainly, would anyone like to share about Registered RAM?
Always use registered ECC RAM for servers. Integrity checking is worth a bit of
money / performance.
Jochem
Ah yeah?
I am actually asking about the RAM for a server..
Yves
On 4/13/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't use registered ram except for a server. It sacrifices a
> little bit of performance for bit checking. For a server, I would
> accept the slight performance hit for the
I wouldn't use registered ram except for a server. It sacrifices a
little bit of performance for bit checking. For a server, I would
accept the slight performance hit for the security that the data
wasn't corrupted.
It's been a while since I've used it since I don't build servers, but
I didn't hav
Candace Cottrell wrote:
>
> Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my machine
> without taking the cover off? It just makes me nervous.
Conquer your fears. Take the cover off.
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Don
m: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: RAM Question
Thanks for all the feedback.
Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my machine without
taking the cover off? It just makes me nervous.
Candace K. Cot
, 2004 2:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: RAM Question
Thanks for all the feedback.
Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my
machine without taking the cover off? It just makes me nervous.
Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
The Children's Medical Center
esday, September 21, 2004 2:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: RAM Question
Thanks for all the feedback.
Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my machine without
taking the cover off? It just makes me nervous.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubs
Yes, but it is difficult and it could be expensive - pay someone else to do it.
larry
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:11:36 -0400, Candace Cottrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the feedback.
>
> Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my machine without taking the cover off?
Thanks for all the feedback.
Is there a way to find out if I have 2X256 or 1X512 in my machine without taking the cover off? It just makes me nervous.
Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
The Children's Medical Center
One Children's Plaza
Dayton, OH 45404
937-641-4293
http://www.childrensday
Personally I don't think you'll see a huge increase in any particular
application, but you should see a difference in running multiple
applications at once.
Basically if you can afford it I'd go for the Gig, definitely. Even if you
see NO difference you can also set up a nice RAM disk and use it
Assuming its dual channel, make sure that the RAM is the same type,
that results in quite the performance boost.
larry
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:29:54 -0400, Candace Cottrell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so my new computer has a 3 GHz P4 and 512 MB of PC3200 400 MHz RAM.
>
> My question is...
>
Good news - You won't have 1512 MB, you'll have 1536!
Anyway, there are two rules with RAM:
1. You can never have too much RAM
2. See Rule 1.
You will see a marked improvement in almost every intensive application
by adding that much memory. That is to say, Minesweeper won't be any
faster, bu
I think you'll be just fine with the 512 additional. At some point you get
diminishing returns and I believe the 512 itself surpasses that, much less
the whole extra gig.
- Matt Small
_
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:30 AM
To: CF-C
17 matches
Mail list logo
