Re: Site review request

2004-10-04 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Kevin Graeme wrote: > I clicked on the first link on the left and got stuck. I didn't want > to go through the "wizard"-type configuration thing but going to that > section replaced all the usefull navigation with something specific to > the configuration steps. I quit after that. All of the navig

Re: Site review request

2004-10-04 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Paul Vernon wrote: > > In terms of accessibility and browser compatibility, the site uses a LOT > of js scripts which can cause problems if not properly coded and where > the ommission of the noscript tags is prevalent like with this site, on > can only assume the worst for those browsers that don'

Re: Site review request

2004-10-04 Thread Jim Campbell
Probably coming in late here, but at first glance - the content of the "Alerting Service" box on the right all sort of flows together.  Maybe putting in a little more space between each link, or alternating row colors or something? - Jim Jochem van Dieten wrote: >http://resnet.tudelft.nl/ > >

Re: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Kevin Graeme
I clicked on the first link on the left and got stuck. I didn't want to go through the "wizard"-type configuration thing but going to that section replaced all the usefull navigation with something specific to the configuration steps. I quit after that. -Kevin On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:17:05 -0400,

RE: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Vernon
Oh, why didn't you say so? I was being polite! I've donned my Jakob Nielsen hat so here are some comments about site and structure... HTH... Paul If it's meant to be XHTML then it really should have DOCTYPE declarations in all the pages... There are more alt attributes missing than you can shake

Re: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Paul Vernon wrote: > I got it here in the UK... The entire site validates reasonably well... > Looks good to me! I was hoping for some more negative comments. The design was forced upon the site, and for a number of reason I believe it is a mess. Originally it didn't have compliant XHTML or CSS.

Re: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Larry C. Lyons wrote: > Just tried going to the site and got a site not found message. I get it fine, even from shell servers in the US. Assuming a recent Windows, could you tell me the outcome of the following command sequence:   nslookup   set debug   resnet.tudelft.nl   server 130.161.180.1   

RE: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Paul Vernon
I got it here in the UK... The entire site validates reasonably well... Looks good to me! Paul [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Re: Site review request

2004-10-03 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Just tried going to the site and got a site not found message. larry On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:17:05 -0400, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://resnet.tudelft.nl/ > > Jochem > > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations