RE: Site searching

2004-02-12 Thread Lyons, Larry
Pointy Haired Boss. It's a dilbertism. larry -Original Message- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 9:24 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re:Site searching PHB? I had the same question recently and ran up against the usual PHB set of responses.

RE: Site searching

2004-02-11 Thread Lyons, Larry
Sales people? I had the same question recently and ran up against the usual PHB set of responses. larry -Original Message- From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:19 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Site searching Why would a company pay

RE: Site searching

2004-02-11 Thread Philip Arnold
Why would a company pay $20,000 a year to Atomz or $20,000 for a google appliance versus building a CF-verity search engine?? The Google functionality has a load of technology built into it for the intelligent searches Verity is good, but not really high-level corporate power/reliability You

RE: Site searching

2004-02-11 Thread Candace Cottrell
H Is there anything that is somewhere in between Verity and Atomz/Google? (both functionality and price-wise) Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer The Children's Medical Center One Children's Plaza Dayton, OH 45404 937-641-4293 http://www.childrensdayton.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Site searching

2004-02-11 Thread Andre Turrettini
why would anyone use cf-verity over lucene? DRE -Original Message- From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:19 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Site searching Why would a company pay $20,000 a year to Atomz or $20,000 for a google appliance

RE: Site searching

2004-02-11 Thread Philip Arnold
why would anyone use cf-verity over lucene? Because Lucene can't index ColdFusion Queries? I had to build a Verity search which went over 200+ tables in a datasource - I had to virtually build the query in CFScript and then run a Verity build on that If you can do that in Lucene, then I'd be