RE: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Scott Raley
Do you do real work? -Original Message- From: Ras Tafari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 12:52 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Windows 7 = blah why does it seem that i am the only person without vista problems? on my desktop @ home and laptop at work, i

RE: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Jacob
-community Subject: Re: Windows 7 = blah why does it seem that i am the only person without vista problems? on my desktop @ home and laptop at work, i havent a single complaint. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > that beats vista by 700% ! > > On Aug 12, 2009,

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread morgan l
There also existed rare creatures with problems with 98, but for whom winMe worked wonders. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ras Tafari wrote: > > why does it seem that i am the only person without vista problems? on > my desktop @ home and laptop at work, i havent a single complaint. > > On W

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Ras Tafari
ok cool! me too, ultimate is my version at home (thanks to our friend here) and at work its the business version. word. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:55 PM, William Bowen wrote: > > You're not the only one. > > I run Vista Home Ultimate at home with nary a care. > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:52 AM

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread William Bowen
You're not the only one. I run Vista Home Ultimate at home with nary a care. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Ras Tafari wrote: > > why does it seem that i am the only person without vista problems? on > my desktop @ home and laptop at work, i havent a single complaint. > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Ras Tafari
why does it seem that i am the only person without vista problems? on my desktop @ home and laptop at work, i havent a single complaint. On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > that beats vista by 700% ! > > On Aug 12, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Vivec wrote: > >> >> Just checked, m

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
that beats vista by 700% ! On Aug 12, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Vivec wrote: > > Just checked, my machine running Windows 7 has now been up and > running for 1 > week of constant use with no slowdowns or hiccups. > > > ~| Want to r

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-12 Thread Vivec
Just checked, my machine running Windows 7 has now been up and running for 1 week of constant use with no slowdowns or hiccups. ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of F

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-04 Thread denstar
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > Windows 7 does not suck pig balls, ergo it is better than Vista. LOL! :D -- If writers stopped writing about what happened to them, then there would be a lot of empty pages. Elaine Liner

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-03 Thread Robert Munn
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Vivec wrote: > > Windows 7 vs XP and Vista charts here. > It really is a lot better than Vista, and I would say it matches XP. > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=22006&page=2 > Windows 7 does not suck pig balls, ergo it is better than Vista. ~~

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-03 Thread Cameron Childress
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > I like the new name Camero.   Is that in honor of the new Camaro? List chopper eats my name sometimes. If I add some after my name I think it prevents chopping. -Cameron CHOPPER PREVENTE ~~~

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-03 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I like the new name Camero. Is that in honor of the new Camaro? On Aug 3, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Vivec wrote: >> Windows 7 vs XP and Vista charts here. >> It really is a lot better than Vista, and I would say it matches XP. >> >> http://

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-03 Thread Cameron Childress
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Vivec wrote: > Windows 7 vs XP and Vista charts here. > It really is a lot better than Vista, and I would say it matches XP. > > http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=22006&page=2 "The time it takes an operating system to start up is not crucially important for performance

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-03 Thread Vivec
Windows 7 vs XP and Vista charts here. It really is a lot better than Vista, and I would say it matches XP. http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=22006&page=2 2009/8/2 Larry Lyons : > > Are you sure you're not taking about OSX? I mean aside from the DRM stuff > that is the Mac. ~~~

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-08-02 Thread Larry Lyons
>It starts a lot faster. > >You can actually use your computer a lot sooner from launch. > >There are far less services loaded at launch. > >It handles memory a lot more efficiently than Vista. > >It is optimised for SSD hard disks. > >The User Interface is much enhanced, I love it over Vista and

RE: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Scott Raley
essage- From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 1:24 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Windows 7 = blah On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, G Money wrote: >> For the record, VISTA was the s

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Cameron Childress
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, G Money wrote: >> For the record, VISTA was the step backward ;) I meant Win7 is a step back forward to the same place XP has always been? ~~~

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Cameron Childress
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:07 PM, G Money wrote: > For the record, VISTA was the step backward ;) So, XP is a step forward to the same place XP is now? ~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread G Money
For the record, VISTA was the step backward ;) On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:54 PM, G Money wrote: > > Is it fast, stable, and compatible with most legacy apps?!?!? I > mean...lets > > get back to the basics. > > Sounds like you are

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Cameron Childress
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:54 PM, G Money wrote: > Is it fast, stable, and compatible with most legacy apps?!?!? I mean...lets > get back to the basics. Sounds like you are saying it's good because it works like XP did. Step backwards anyone?

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Cameron Childress
Sounds like you are saying "Win7 is good because Vista sucked in the following ways"... On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Vivec wrote: > > It starts a lot faster. > > You can actually use your computer a lot sooner from launch. > > There are far less services loaded at launch. > > It handles memor

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Casey Dougall
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've had Windows 7 installed for a few weeks now as a vm. So far, I > can't see what's so impressive about it. It's still got the registry > (which I consider the bane of windows). It's got a start bu

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Vivec
It starts a lot faster. You can actually use your computer a lot sooner from launch. There are far less services loaded at launch. It handles memory a lot more efficiently than Vista. It is optimised for SSD hard disks. The User Interface is much enhanced, I love it over Vista and have found

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread G Money
Is it fast, stable, and compatible with most legacy apps?!?!? I mean...lets get back to the basics. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ray Champagne wrote: > > It's shiny > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < > zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I've had Windows

Re: Windows 7 = blah

2009-07-31 Thread Ray Champagne
It's shiny On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox < zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've had Windows 7 installed for a few weeks now as a vm. So far, I > can't see what's so impressive about it. It's still got the registry > (which I consider the bane of windows). It's go