You could just call it NCAA recruiting week.
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/01/04 11:53AM >>>
...walking through a rapist convention
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I'm sorry, the metaphor needed a little more work.
"If she's wearing a see through dress and walking through a rapist
convention then yes, she's asking for it". That's the web.
I once installed a SQL server and went away for 10 minutes. I planned to
patch it but before I could, it was infected with
If she's wearing a see-through dress and walking through downtown hell, then
yes, she's asking for it. The web is not disney world, it's the worst of the
wild west. You make sure your door is locked and windows closed. You don't
leave everything open and expect no one to come in.
> Sounds an awful
Sounds an awful lot like "the way she was dressed, she deserved what she
got."
-Kevin
> Nope, in the worst way. Anyone who has a site (especially a security
agency)
> that can be hacked using a simple url scan or script kiddy attack deserves
> what they get.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[
Nope, in the worst way. Anyone who has a site (especially a security agency)
that can be hacked using a simple url scan or script kiddy attack deserves
what they get.
> you mean shmucks "in the nicest sense", right? ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mdinowit
>
> 3. On the other hand, an u
you mean shmucks "in the nicest sense", right? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: mdinowit
3. On the other hand, an url scan is not a hack attack. Anyone who can get
into a site using an url scan deserves to, especially a 'secure site' as it
says that the site owners are shmucks.
Outbound emai
ements distributed by PR Newswire, a public relations
firm.
> In one such statement, Earth Station V declared it was "at war" with the
> RIAA and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), asserting that
> "resistance is futile and we are in control now."
>
>
1. A script kiddy is not an expert in security and at least a slap on the
wrists should have been given.
2. Public good? BS. An attack is an attack and I'd be pissed if anyone tried
to attack my resources. They should as well.
3. On the other hand, an url scan is not a hack attack. Anyone who can g
: Re: Youth cleared of trying to hack Mossad Web site
OMG! Free pr0n!
Okay, seriously I don't know what connection you're trying to make. The
first was a case of a kid attempting to hack a major national security
agency. This one is about copyright violations. They seem like apples and
ora
>>They seem like apples and
>>oranges to me.
Which are staple ingredients for fruit salad.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:30 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Youth cleared of trying to hack Mossad Web sit
OMG! Free pr0n!
Okay, seriously I don't know what connection you're trying to make. The
first was a case of a kid attempting to hack a major national security
agency. This one is about copyright violations. They seem like apples and
oranges to me.
-Kevin
> Ok,
>
> So what's your response to this
I wonder if "URL Hacking" constitutes as hacking at all. I mean you dont have to do anything special. it's just there.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
To: CF-Community
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: Youth cleared of trying to hack
sarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
This of course begs the question of would there have been an acquittal if it
had been a Palestinian youth?
-Kevin
> The Jerusalem Magistrate's Court acquitted Sunday an Israeli youth charged
> with attempting to hack the Web site of the Mossad secret service.
Presiding
> judge Abraham Tennenbaum,
14 matches
Mail list logo
