But we already interfere in destroying them...we can't interfere in helping
them?
Loud noises, loss of habitat, chemicals in food chain etc. etc. We DO
interfere.
On 18 May 2012 16:21, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> because you cannot interfere. These are wild animals and it is a risk
> But to do ot
because you cannot interfere. These are wild animals and it is a risk
But to do otherwise is to do a disservice to the species. The birds
have to be paranoid of people hand raising them removes that. Moreover
the nest is on a ledge at the top of a tall building. It would be a
difficult effort to
because you cannot interfere. These are wild animals and it is a risk
But to do otherwise is to do a disservice to the species. The birds
have to be paranoid of people hand raising them removes that. Moreover
the nest is on a ledge at the top of a fairly tall building. Not the
most accessible pla
Why didn't naturalists help them then? incubate them or something...
I don't always agree with this "no intervention, just observation" crap.
On 18 May 2012 11:29, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> they've been nesting there for a few years. People have really gown
> attached to them. Last year becaus
I am sharing this on my FB page for my Van Horn High School friends...Go
Falcons!
Rick
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
ht
they've been nesting there for a few years. People have really gown
attached to them. Last year because it was so cold and rainly the
falcons lost their brood. People actually mourned.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> that's cool :)
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Lar
that's cool :)
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> The falcon web cam in Winnipeg shows that the nesting pair of falcons
> on top of the Radisson Hotel has hatched a brood:
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/manitoba/features/falcon/
>
> real cool watching them.
>
> --
> Larry C. Lyo