yeah, I recall there being a bit of controversy at the time as some
thought he'd be a shoe-in to get the Best Supporting Actor...but he
was nominated for Best Actor.
Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't.
> Am I remembering that wrong? I thought it was best supporting actor.
--
will
"I
Am I remembering that wrong? I thought it was best supporting actor.
nevermind
Dana
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:12:29 -0800, William Bowen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > he may have a point. Look at Driving Miss Daisy.
>
> where Morgan Freeman was nominated for Best Actor?
>
> --
> will
>
> "If
> he may have a point. Look at Driving Miss Daisy.
where Morgan Freeman was nominated for Best Actor?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Purchase
he may have a point. Look at Driving Miss Daisy.
Dana
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:19:55 -0800, William Bowen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait a minute... so the producers of Collateral are racist because
> they didn't push Foxx for a Best Actor Oscar, but the producers of Ray
> (who _did_ push Foxx
> -Original Message-
> From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:20 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: oscan noms and jamie foxx
>
> Wait a minute... so the producers of Collateral are racist because
> they didn'
Wait a minute... so the producers of Collateral are racist because
they didn't push Foxx for a Best Actor Oscar, but the producers of Ray
(who _did_ push Foxx for BA Oscar)and Hotel Rwanda (BA Nomination for
Don Cheadle) are not?
?!?!
> Mm hmm.
> Ever the optimist aren't we.
> *humph*
*humph* in
I'll file that for the next time I am in in Blockbuster.
Dana
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:03:59 -0600, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dana, I'd highly recommend seeing it. I thought it was a great movie.
>
>
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:46 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I ha
Dana, I'd highly recommend seeing it. I thought it was a great movie.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:05:46 -0700, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not seen the movie but I suspect you may be right.
>
> Dana
>
~|
Discover CFTick
I have not seen the movie but I suspect you may be right.
Dana
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:21:19 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct.
> Jamie Foxx's character was the lead character.
>
> But then...as the discussion on the list shows.
> We all know why he was placed as the 'Supp
Mm hmm.
Ever the optimist aren't we.
*humph*
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons
because he was not as big of a "Star" as Tom Cruise perhaps?
larry
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk an
> because he was not as big of a "Star" as Tom Cruise perhaps?
I don't remember reading anything about Cruise even being in the
running. I don't think the producers shopped him for Best Actor this
year... I could be wrong.
Generally the rationale given is, what does this person in this role
have
because he was not as big of a "Star" as Tom Cruise perhaps?
larry
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:21:19 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct.
> Jamie Foxx's character was the lead character.
>
> But then...as the discussion on the list shows.
> We all know why he was placed as the
Beautiful. I love it when two threads morph together like that!
At 05:21 PM 1/25/2005, you wrote:
>Correct.
>Jamie Foxx's character was the lead character.
>
>But then...as the discussion on the list shows.
>We all know why he was placed as the 'Supporting Actor'.
>
>0_0
>-Gel
>
>-Original Me
Correct.
Jamie Foxx's character was the lead character.
But then...as the discussion on the list shows.
We all know why he was placed as the 'Supporting Actor'.
0_0
-Gel
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden
So, Jamie Foxx got an Oscar nom for Best Supporting Actor for Collateral.
> -Original Message-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 4:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: oscan noms and jamie foxx
>
> So, Jamie Foxx got an Oscar nom for Best Supporting Actor for
> Collateral. I loved that movie. But maybe I saw the wr
15 matches
Mail list logo
