Re: Radiation Warning

2012-05-06 Thread Dana
meh. It's certainly making no attempt to be objective. I did hear something very close to that UC Berkeley claim though, from I believe the Berkeley public radio station. The rest of it is question marks. I've listened to news programs that appear reputable that weren't exactly smiley faces on the

Re: Radiation Warning

2012-05-06 Thread LRS Scout
Yeah I haven't read anything on that site that is up to what I would consider up to journalistic standards, and I spent some time on stuff that interests me. On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Andrew Grosset wrote: > > > The Radiation Wa

Re: Radiation Warning

2012-05-06 Thread Cameron Childress
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Andrew Grosset wrote: > The Radiation Warnings You Won’t Get from the Mainstream Propaganda Machine > http://tinyurl.com/cc5be8c Vague when convenient and specific when convenient. What a crappy quality story. -Cameron ...

Re: Radiation Warning

2012-05-06 Thread PT
Oh those wacky conspiracy theorists. What would we do without them? On 5/6/2012 2:09 AM, Andrew Grosset wrote: > > The Radiation Warnings You Won’t Get from the Mainstream Propaganda Machine > http://tinyurl.com/cc5be8c > > Increase in infant mortality: > http://tinyurl.com/7h92r37 ~~

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-31 Thread Casey Dougall
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > No, it's even worse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bhoWfC1L9k > > No, it's even worse... http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/5146.htm Renowned Pakistani Columnist Nusrat Mirza Accuses U.S. Of Artificially Causing Japanese E

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-30 Thread Judah McAuley
No, it's even worse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bhoWfC1L9k On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Andrew Grosset wrote: > > gets even worse > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWlDtqTU-tE > >>Seems like the situation in Japan is far worse than we thought: >> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-30 Thread Andrew Grosset
gets even worse http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWlDtqTU-tE >Seems like the situation in Japan is far worse than we thought: > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MognnB0g56Y&feature=player_embedded ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-30 Thread Andrew Grosset
Seems like the situation in Japan is far worse than we thought: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MognnB0g56Y&feature=player_embedded ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-29 Thread Gruss Gott
Judah McAuley wrote: > I agree that CT and Mammograms are not no-risk but if you look at the > figures you just supplied, it would suggest that it would take 33 > Mammograms or 17 CT Chest scans to approach the level with the dosage > linked to increased cancer risk. That's true, unless of cours

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-28 Thread Judah McAuley
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Great stuff, but this provides a great thread-jack opportunity for healthcare: > > Note that: > > 1.) Lowest 1-year dose clearly linked to increased cancer risk = 100 mSv > > 2.) Chest CT Scan = 6 mSv > > 3.) Mammogram = 3 mSv > > 4.) Dental

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-27 Thread Maureen
The contract dye used in my treatments has killed my kidneys. Medicine is dangerous, even when it doesn't include radiation. I turned down both chemo and radiation for just that reason. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Michael Dinowitz wrote: > > My cousin who passed away last month got leukemi

RE: Radiation information

2011-03-27 Thread Eric Roberts
Think of how much money you wills save on flashlight batteries :-D -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com] Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 21:34 To: cf-community Subject: Radiation information I found a chart or two that gives a nice breakdown on wha

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-27 Thread Michael Dinowitz
My cousin who passed away last month got leukemia from the radiation treatment she was receiving to get rid of her cancer. The cure can be just as bad as the disease when it comes to radiation. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Michael Dinowitz wrote: > > > > I found a c

Re: Radiation information

2011-03-27 Thread Gruss Gott
Michael Dinowitz wrote: > > I found a chart or two that gives a nice breakdown on what radiation > exposure means to you. > http://xkcd.com/radiation/ > Great stuff, but this provides a great thread-jack opportunity for healthcare: Note that: 1.) Lowest 1-year dose clearly linked to increased

Re: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread G
Haven't all scientific studies in this area basically confirmed that no reliable affectors for the sex of an infant have been found? > That would be easily tested by doing an analysis of male/female births by > temperature zone. > >> There have been some studies that suggest temperature may play

RE: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Michael Dinowitz
That would be easily tested by doing an analysis of male/female births by temperature zone. > There have been some studies that suggest temperature may play a role in > this. I can not remember which way it goes. Whether its warmer > temperatures produce more X chromosome sperm and cooler tempe

Re: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Kevin Graeme
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:11:38 -0500, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My wife pointed it out and wondered since most of the people there > were programmers, if the radiation kills boy sperm. There was a light but interesting series on NPR recently exploring the Y chromosome and how it'

RE: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Ian Skinner
...Subject: Re: radiation ... ...not exactly an answer to your question...but an observation my wife ...recently made ... ...I just moved down to Jax, FL to start a new job. A couple of weeks ...ago my wife and I (with our two daughters, age 2 yrs and 4 months in ...tow) went to a party hosted

RE: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Michael Dinowitz
My daughter would LOVE this to be true. As is, one girl and 2 boys. I'm just a bit concerned about all the background EM around. > not exactly an answer to your question...but an observation my wife > recently made > > I just moved down to Jax, FL to start a new job. A couple of weeks > ag

Re: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Larry C. Lyons
Only if they don't have that extra head right? I don't think you have much to worry about. larry On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:07:04 -0500, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a rather interesting question. I'm in an office in front of a 21 > inch monitor with 2 racks of servers abo

RE: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Matthew Small
When I was in the USMC, I worked in an Avionics shop around TONS of radiation... almost nobody had boys. - Matt Small -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 2:12 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: radiation not exactly an answer

RE: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Russel Madere
Do they have to just have 1 head, 2 arms and 2 legs? Too bad ;) Actually, I'm not sure. You will get some radiation in the x-ray wavelength from a CRT. Electron beams are so much fun. The servers shouldn't emit much radiation except for any intrinsic to the components. There are no electron a

Re: radiation

2005-01-31 Thread Charlie Griefer
not exactly an answer to your question...but an observation my wife recently made I just moved down to Jax, FL to start a new job. A couple of weeks ago my wife and I (with our two daughters, age 2 yrs and 4 months in tow) went to a party hosted by my then soon-to-be new boss. He has two gir