On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Larry wrote:
>
> Problem is he's arguing from authority rather than the quality of the data.
>
> In other words, he thinks that because this guy's a "scientist" and
> cool then he must be right.
>
Actually, the people at the center of the scandal are the ones ar
Problem is he's arguing from authority rather than the quality of the data.
In other words, he thinks that because this guy's a "scientist" and
cool then he must be right.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:37 PM, denstar wrote:
>
> Isn't he the guy who thinks the "second hand smoke" link to cancer is
Isn't he the guy who thinks the "second hand smoke" link to cancer is bunk?
How do you feel about "second hand smoke", Rob?
--
Study the past, if you would divine the future.
Confucius
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> An excellent read by a respected scientist at MIT on
An excellent read by a respected scientist at MIT on the complexities of
climate and the failures of researchers to adequately model them, among
other things:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703939404574567423917025400.html
~
