Du haßt mich oder du hast mich?
> Willst du bis zum tod der scheide
> Sie lieben auch in schlechten tagen
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
we thought maybe you were swimmin' with the fishes..
On Jan 3, 2008 7:04 PM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where'd u go?
>
> On Jan 3, 2008 4:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Gel wrote:
> > > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
Mein Leben!
On Jan 3, 2008 8:06 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 11:55 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
> > Nein!
> >
> >
>
> Willst du bis zum tod der scheide
> Sie lieben auch
: Someone is trying to sue me
On Jan 3, 2008 11:55 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
>
> Nein!
>
>
Willst du bis zum tod der scheide
Sie lieben auch in schlechten tagen
> --
> will
>
On Jan 3, 2008 11:55 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
>
> Nein!
>
>
Willst du bis zum tod der scheide
Sie lieben auch in schlechten tagen
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
> and th
> TheCrowwrote:
> Yea, drove back to Maine
Cool! yeah, saw family, friends, made new friends - had a great
vacation (this thread btw provided HOURS of entertainment with
everyone! lots of great conversation)
Also ate at a lot of great restaurants. one that sticks out is a new
one in Milwaukee
Um, some strange time-lapse deal obviously just occurred.
Disregard previous question, now already answered.
--
The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget;
the wise forgive but do not forget.
Thomas Szasz,
On Jan 3, 2008 7:16 PM, Dinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O
On Jan 3, 2008 3:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gel wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
>
> I'm back! Just returned from vacation. Boo. Had a fun time though!
You can't scare me. I know you're just a figment.
Where did you may
Yea, drove back to Maine (my 'rents live on a lake in the middle of nowhere
now), on the way there probably crossed paths with you, drove through south
of the great lakes, on the way back, went north through canada. Canada is
the way to make that trip, and I have made the trip twice now, so I feel
> TheCrow wrote:
> where'd u go?
>
All over the midwest! Milwaukee, Chicago, etc. Had lots of great
food. how about you? Did ya get back east for Christmahanakwanaka?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important a
where'd u go?
On Jan 3, 2008 4:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Gel wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
> >
>
> I'm back! Just returned from vacation. Boo. Had a fun time though!
>
>
> Gel wrote:
> Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
>
I'm back! Just returned from vacation. Boo. Had a fun time though!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic re
Assuming "he" isn't already here, /still/ talking. It's a mystery, remember?
:-)
On Jan 3, 2008 10:55 AM, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
>
> Nein!
>
>
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
> Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
Nein!
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is th
Hmm...
Since this thread has anyone heard anything from ole Gruss Gott?
On Dec 26, 2007 11:45 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's one thing to publicly state your real and legal name when you state a
> position and engage in an argument; it's another thing altogether to hide
> behi
I know this is off-topic but this thread is already way off topic.
I was looking at a response tigerbay.org sent to apple in response to
a threat if legal action, and the footer of the message was this:
> This message and any attached documents contain information from the
> law firm of OMelveny
On Dec 26, 2007 2:21 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note though that the vernacular still happily says "tracteur" and
> "skidou"
Sacrebleu! (*double giggle*)
LOL! The world, she keeps on a turn'n, neh? I think it's funny too,
and having funny stuff is essential.
--
It is a good morning
yes, this is true, or something like it is. I think it may be the
Academy or something. But yes, the concern is with words like "OK" and
"skidoo" and "tractor" creeping into the language. Unlike English,
which is rather like Ankh-Morpork in this regard, the French
intelligentsia feels quite strongl
On Dec 26, 2007 8:45 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > He cannot answer, lest his secret identity become known, thus
> > putting his family in danger.
>
> It's one thing to publicly state your real and legal name when you state a
> position and engage in an argument; it's another thi
> He cannot answer, lest his secret identity become known, thus
> putting his family in danger.
It's one thing to publicly state your real and legal name when you state a
position and engage in an argument; it's another thing altogether to hide
behind anonymity while blustering about and making ri
On Dec 23, 2007 5:44 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll go make the popcorn.
> *walks off to microwave*
He cannot answer, lest his secret identity become known, thus
putting his family in danger.
Sheesh, that's like nom de plumb 101 or somethin'.
Seriously tho, I've always sorta
On Dec 20, 2007 11:01 AM, Bruce Sorge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what are my options? Do I blow them off or take seriously their
> threat to sue me in 10 days if I don't relinquish the domain name?
I'd simply offer to sell them the domain name and if they refuse, let
them try to sue (assuming
I'll go make the popcorn.
*walks off to microwave*
On Dec 23, 2007 7:46 PM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please give references to these lawsuits so I can look them up? I'm
> curious as to their nature and their final disposition.
>
> You have actually collected (not jus
your capacity as a ColdFusion developer?
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying t
> Adam wrote:
> You must not have gotten very deep into the discussion of the basic concepts
> of law and trial, then.
>
Well, trial, that's true. I've only had to go to trial twice as we
usually settle out of court. I scored $22M this summer which puts my
career total over $100M. How about you
> > Adam wrote:
> > I just wish you would spend a lunch with a competent attorney and
> talk a
> > little bit about the very most basic concepts of law and trial.
>
> Well, last week I had Christmas lunch with many of the people that
> report to me and they're all attorneys.
You must not have got
> Adam wrote:
> I just wish you would spend a lunch with a competent attorney and talk a
> little bit about the very most basic concepts of law and trial.
Well, last week I had Christmas lunch with many of the people that
report to me and they're all attorneys.
~~~
What about pizza and fried foods?
I think the reason this lady got burned was because she didn't want to
pull down her sweatpants in front of her grandson.
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-pizza-burn.htm
Although the painful injury known as a pizza burn can be caused by
other hot foods, many pe
That is pure, cold, unadulterated fear.
You can't talk about scalding and laps without a little, um, shrinkage.
=)
On Dec 22, 2007 9:32 PM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My sack is tingling just thinking about it! :)
~
You know, I'm wondering why an enterprising group of attorneys has not
brought a class action suit against the official body (bodies?) that
recommend(s) service at such coffee temperatures without following that up
with any safety recommendations whatsoever.
I mean, look at the established histo
ott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 7:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>
> > Todd wrote:
> > It is reasonable to expect to be burned a bit by a hot liquid. It is
> not
> > reasonable to expect to be burne
> The level of injury is irrelevant. I can kill myself with a
> toothpick. If I do, that doesn't make Diamond MORE liable than had I
> simply poked myself. The question therefore is 3-fold:
The level of injury is not irellevant. It is about what is reasonably
expected. When someone gives me
> Todd wrote:
> It is reasonable to expect to be burned a bit by a hot liquid. It is not
> reasonable to expect to be burned that severely. I mean, my god man, skin
> grafts?
>
The level of injury is irrelevant. I can kill myself with a
toothpick. If I do, that doesn't make Diamond MORE liable
-
From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>> Todd wrote:
>> As someone else said, I am pretty sure there is a resting period where
>> the
>> food
> Todd wrote:
> As someone else said, I am pretty sure there is a resting period where the
> food is allowed to cool some.
So your logic is that:
(1.) Some food has a resting period and some doesn't. Coffee doesn't.
Just because.
(2.) As part of your food class system, Class II foods (those th
> Sam wrote:
> The woman was 79 and should know by now coffee burns. If she were 13
> I'd give her a pass for learning experience but not at 79. I'm kind of
> shocked she even lived this long ;)
>
+1.
Her lawyers are clearly very good; they were first able to convince
the women to sue, and second
The link Todd provided said so.:
http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
Stella Liebeck of Albuquerque, New Mexico, was in the passenger seat of
her grandson's car when she was severely burned by McDonalds' coffee in
February 1992. Liebeck, 79 at the time, ordered coffee that was served
in a styro
mized,
making it a much safer product. Temperatue is not the only factor here.
- Original Message -
From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>> Todd wrot
> Are you really defending a person that put a Styrofoam cup of hot
> coffee between her legs, while in a car, and takes off the lid?
>
> By the way, Styrofoam melts at 464 deg f. How did McD's get water that
> hot?
By the way, in your infinite wisdom how do you know it was a Styrofoam cup?
jus
> Todd wrote:
> , is that
> a liquid meant for human consumption will cause 3rd degree burns when it
> comes in contact with the very skin it is supposed to touch.
Pizza rolls are meant for human consumption but will cause 3rd degree
burns when they come into contact with skin they are meant to to
> Adam wrote:
> Everything depends on how the facts of a case appear to either adhere to or
> violate the principles of law, and the understanding and presentation of
> relevant subtleties you personally have is nowhere near what an attorney
> has.
Maybe you should take Bruce's case - sounds like
> Dana wrote:
> Gruss simplistic?? Never
>
THAT'S IT!! You're kill filed! That'll show you.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net
jury, than that is fine, but to call the entire
> case silly and raise it up on a pedestal as an example of our overly
> litigious society is, well, silly.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Churvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community&
is, well, silly.
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Churvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:37 AM
Subject: RE: Someone is trying to sue me
> Gruss,
>
> You're thinking way too simplistically about law. There is v
m: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 1:40 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>
> > Todd wrote:
> > I really don't think you will expect it to give you 3rd degree
> > burns.
>
> So the quest
Depends on the tea.. something like green or white tea, you don't want
boiling water.. you want about 170-180 and brews for about 3 minutes
(the higher temps or longer steep times will result in a bitter
tasting tea).
For Black tea (or herbal), you want boiling water for about 5 minutes.
On Dec 2
> Todd wrote:
> I really don't think you will expect it to give you 3rd degree
> burns.
So the question is at what temperature are the service of food and
beverages be considered negligent?
I remember as a kid I would make Jeno's Pizza rolls according to the
manufacturer's directions and, if I po
I suspect not :)
On Dec 21, 2007 4:18 PM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe people think the heat will keep the fat from congealing
> > in their arteries ;)
>
> I actually heard something about this. I don't know if there is anything to
> it.
~
> Maybe people think the heat will keep the fat from congealing
> in their arteries ;)
I actually heard something about this. I don't know if there is anything to
it.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important a
perhaps. I was taught boiling water.
On Dec 21, 2007 4:02 PM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ick, tea should be made with water that is boiling hot as it is being
> > poured.
>
> I've heard that the best temp for tea is actually 170F.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Adam Phillip Churvis
> Presi
I don't really see the point of coffee that hot, personally, no,
though I have read that McD's product research shows that people buy
it more often when it is that hot. If you are sitting down and paying
Starbucks prices for a coffee or tea then the temperature at which the
water hits the beans or
> ick, tea should be made with water that is boiling hot as it is being
> poured.
I've heard that the best temp for tea is actually 170F.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
~|
Adobe® ColdFu
> However, my main point was that yes, coffee really is routinely served
> that hot. It may not be smart to hold it in your lap, but hey, neither
> is drinking it white driving and yes, I do this all the time, still.
But, WHY? You can't drink it that hot. If you are that into coffee that
you ha
was worth it.
:)
Ugh about the deer. I have hit 3 in my lifetime. Good for you that you
managed to miss it.
- Original Message -
From: "Dana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>> Todd wrote:
>> Yeah, and I don't think people getting coffee at McDonalds are going for
>> gourmet flavor, so all of this "op
nk .. not even when one
> is being served something that is supposed to be "hot"
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to su
$1.35 million a day in coffee sales and they have 700 burns over ten years?
Sounds like MOST people realize hot liquids burn
On Dec 21, 2007 2:10 PM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did any of you arguing for McDonalds read any of the reasoning behind the
> jury decision?
>
> Let me make it ea
On Dec 21, 2007 2:25 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now shoot yourself in the head and then sue the gun manufacturer.
> You're going to rich! RICH I TELL YOU!
that's just ridiculous.
sue the bullet manufacturer. guns don't kill people. bullets do :)
--
"Scientists tell us that
rtain this is not an unreasonable
expectation to have when being served a liquid to drink .. not even when one
is being served something that is supposed to be "hot"
- Original Message -
From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Friday, Decembe
> Todd wrote:
> Yeah, and I don't think people getting coffee at McDonalds are going for
> gourmet flavor, so all of this "optimum temperature and flavor" stuff really
> doesn't seem to apply.
>
So please define negligent coffee temperature for coffee.
Now please please define those establishment
ot; stuff really
> doesn't seem to apply.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community"
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>
>
> > http://www.bo
> Todd wrote:
> McDonald's knowingly and willfully sold a dangerous product not fit for
> reasonable use.
>
So how about this: I get totally shit-faced and fall asleep on the ice
at the local rink. I get frost bite. Shall I sue? Was the rink
providing a product unsafe to use?
It seems that th
ECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> http://www.boyds.com/coffee/brewingguide.html
> Serve coffee as soon after brewing as possible. Coffee loses flavor
> and aroma quickly. If brewed coffee
e use.
The only way this fits with that asinine "ladder" comparison is if the
ladder had rungs that would collapse under certain conditions, or something
to that affect, making the product as a whole defective when used in a
reasonable manner.
- Original Message -----
From: "G
> Ian wrote:
> I know it is so annoying -- just because the coffee was so hot (nearly
> boiling) that it melted the cup
As Sam pointed out, it couldn't have melted the cup. Further, I just
went to my local Caribou Coffee and bought a large Moosed Americano.
I also brought along my meat thermomet
http://www.boyds.com/coffee/brewingguide.html
Serve coffee as soon after brewing as possible. Coffee loses flavor
and aroma quickly. If brewed coffee must be "held" on a direct heat
source, it should be held at 185°F, and for no longer than 20 minutes.
Higher temperatures cause coffee to break down
> Adam wrote:
> They gave her
> something well more dangerous than should be reasonably expected
How so? When I buy coffee I expect that it will be so hot as to burn
my mouth if I sipped it right away. I've never not gotten coffee that
way and I buy or make it daily.
I could see your argument
Ah, I miss those cannons.
Is an 8 year old nephew too young to learn the beauty of complete
stupidity? I will need to ask my brother-in-law.
> On Dec 21, 2007 12:58 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's like my pending lawsuit against Pennn. I took the tennis balls
> > out of their
hurvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:50 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>
> > Adam wrote:
> > So... how many times have
My brother and I use to take tennis balls, drill holes in them, and fill
them with caulking. Made great "baseballs"
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to
On Dec 21, 2007 12:58 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's like my pending lawsuit against Pennn. I took the tennis balls
> out of their can, cut a small hole in the bottom about 1/4" from the
> base, filled the bottom up to that hole with lighter fluid, doused a
> tennis ball in light
> Sam wrote:
> What about tea? Usually served boiling. Do people in your circle put
> tea between your legs before removing the lid?
>
Sam. In America if someone gets hurt it's ALWAYS someone else's fault.
It's like my pending lawsuit against Pennn. I took the tennis balls
out of their can, cut
> Adam wrote:
> So... how many times have you been sued, and why?
>
Well, personally I've never been sued, but I always find myself
involved with lawyers for my job. For example, I spent this last
summer facilitating a $22M contract breech bogey. That was basically
3 months of lawyers debating c
I guess we run in different circles.
She was from Albuquerque, that explains a lot:)
What about tea? Usually served boiling. Do people in your circle put
tea between your legs before removing the lid?
On Dec 21, 2007 11:37 AM, Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And .. what did she do again? Hold
The problem is not McDonalds. It is the coffee drinkers.
Drink water. It is better for you.
-Original Message-
From: Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 11:47 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
Let me point this out in case you
- Original Message -
From: "Todd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> And .. what did she do again? Hold the cup between her knees and try to
> remove the lid? If 80% of people out there de
.htm
- Original Message -
From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> On Dec 21, 2007 11:18 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Victim of &
On Dec 21, 2007 11:18 AM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Victim of "evil McDonald's?" I don't think that was in her suit, was it?
I think that's what Ian is implying.
> I would say she's the victim of every unreasonable act that led to the
> incident. Calibrate the coffee machine or
court after hearing about and
seeing plaintiffs' injuries.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 2:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
He s
He said near boiling water melted it.
I know Styrofoam cups get softer when filled with hot liquid but it
doesn't melt.
I also agree if they gave her the initial $20k she asked for it
wouldn't have been news and they would have saved a few hundred
thousand.
But to claim she's a victim of the evil
Just as much as you are apparently defending a company that previously
settled over 700 similar cases out of court for up to $300,000 got
burned by the one they tried to strong arm with an offer of $800.
Espically since her first offer was just for them to cover the medical
expenses totaling s
h deformity to
constitute failure, as in this case) of the vessel from which it's made.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: So
Are you really defending a person that put a Styrofoam cup of hot
coffee between her legs, while in a car, and takes off the lid?
By the way, Styrofoam melts at 464 deg f. How did McD's get water that hot?
On Dec 21, 2007 9:23 AM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "if you can sue for hot
kes it
a whole new ball game, legally.
So... how many times have you been sued, and why?
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 12:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject:
"if you can sue for hot coffee in the lap and win then why not?"
I know it is so annoying -- just because the coffee was so hot (nearly boiling)
that it melted the cup and caused 2nd and 3rd degrees burns of the thighs and
genitals requiring surgery. Combined with the fact that the company had
> Adam wrote:
> The threat is only effective against people uninformed enough to forego
> competent legal counsel and attempt to navigate legal waters themselves.
>
Well, not sure how many of these you've been though, but I've been
through a bunch, with facts about exactly the same, and that's one
ngle most necessarily complex and complicated system of any
kind on Earth.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 10:59 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone
> Adam wrote:
> If, however, that third party persuaded you to not honor the terms of our
> agreement, that might be considered tortious interference.
>
Now that makes some sense. However I would still add that even if we
agree, it's the threat that counts which is why I probably see it all
of th
russ Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 8:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> Adam wrote:
> The party making the claim is not in any way interfering with anything.
>
I'm not agreeing with you mostly because you offer no rea
tt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
>
> > Adam wrote:
> > I'm sorry... I accidentally deleted a word. That claim could *NOT* be
> > construed as either harassment o
> Adam wrote:
> The party making the claim is not in any way interfering with anything.
>
I'm not agreeing with you mostly because you offer no reasoning other
than "talk to an attorney" which, in the end, still wouldn't matter
because it's not important what some random attorney thinks; it's
impo
tt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> Adam wrote:
> I'm sorry... I accidentally deleted a word. That claim could *NOT* be
> construed as either harassment or tortious interference...
&g
> gg wrote:
> Baylor should own the domain due to "confusion" - I would argue it is
> indeed tortious interference.
>
I should add I have no idea what the torts are or what the law is
around cybersquatting (cause I'm lazy and it ain't my field), but I'm
assuming that Baylor U's claim that Bruce ha
0, 2007 4:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
If I remember, tortious interference of a contract is when some dude
tries to get inbetween (wrongfully) 2 parties that have a contact.
Since Bruce and GoDaddy have a contract and Baylor is trying to sever
that contract thro
> Adam wrote:
> I'm sorry... I accidentally deleted a word. That claim could *NOT* be
> construed as either harassment or tortious interference...
>
If I remember, tortious interference of a contract is when some dude
tries to get inbetween (wrongfully) 2 parties that have a contact.
Since Bruc
rsday, December 20, 2007 6:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Someone is trying to sue me
That claim could be construed as either harassment or tortious interference.
If it could, a party with a legal claim wouldn't even be able to claim that
such an issue existed.
Making a single initial claim
nt between two other parties.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 5:51 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Someone is trying to sue me
> Adam wrote:
>
from them again. Apparently, they were just trying to bully her out of the
domain.
- Original Message -
From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: Someone is trying to sue me
> If you have
> Adam wrote:
> How do you see either harassment or tortious interference in this instance?
>
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm guessing that Baylor's behavior could be
construed as harassment (given the threats) and an unjustified
disruption to Bruce's contract with GoDaddy; but, maybe not. Like I
said,
You mean there are places that US copyright law doesn't reach?
0_0
oh
On Dec 20, 2007 4:46 PM, Crow T. Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're lookin for that type of reponse...these are pretty entertaining:
>
> http://thepiratebay.org/legal
>
> Piratebay doesn't have to adhere to th
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
