eugenics ;) You just keep the chuckles coming, doncha, Sam.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> How dare they try to take on the eugenics crowd.
>
> .
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > Not sure that will happen. Given that it's board is composed of
well I am in favor of funding for breast cancer research so I hope they
don't do that cause too much damage along the way. But their behavior on
the issue so far *was* a problem and needed to be addressed. That said,
breast cancer is common, and also well understood, which means there are a
lot of
I compel you with the power of money!
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
[mailto:ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 7:10 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8
How dare they try to take on the eugenics crowd.
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Not sure that will happen. Given that it's board is composed of mainly
> former Bush II admin officials, I suspect that the fun is just beginning.
> When it's over they will blame everyt
Not sure that will happen. Given that it's board is composed of mainly
former Bush II admin officials, I suspect that the fun is just beginning.
When it's over they will blame everything but their own actions for
treating the position as a sinecure and bringing the foundation down to the
ground.
You sound so proud. Rules for radicals baby!
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> The Chicago way
>
>
> With money comes power over Sam; Remember that!
>
Given that the politico newsroom is next door to me, then yes I can say
that they are. Also look who owns them, Allbritton Communications, which is
owned by people who served in the Reagan and Bush I Whitehouses. Gives you
a hint about the tone of the firm. Of course since its not a raving
frothin
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Sam wrote:
> The Chicago way
With money comes power over Sam; Remember that!
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=ho
The Chicago way
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> It's the free market system at work Sam...you should love it...
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-An
It's the free market system at work Sam...you should love it...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:05 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
Your mistake.
This thread is about s
arguing with stupid sure does ;)
Having to defend stupid must get exhausting.
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www
You really hate defending regurgitated moonbat drivel don't you. It
would be much easier of every one agreed with you and handed you
+1000's all day.
Having to defend stupid must get exhausting.
Maybe we should start a new group called CF_LarryDanaWordView
No disagreements allowed and free Kool-ai
no. Komen needing to get its priorities straight, and all its policy
members rowing in the same direction.
Maybe to take a look at its PR and realize that they have overexposed
themselves and STFU for a while. Possibly to re-think some of the pink
ribbon branding, especially for items that clearly
Got some inside knowledge there, Sam?
go find another bridge to lurk under.
D
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You got to admit at $500 a pop there's a lot of money involved.
> Corporate greed? Isn't that the latest rallying cry?
>
> .
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dana
You mean the separation of Woman Health Issues and Abortion?
Yeah, that problem has been solved.
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> Breast cancer funding is not going to go away, Sam. Breathe ;) They may
> have a drop in donations for a while, just because they were so corporate
Breast cancer funding is not going to go away, Sam. Breathe ;) They may
have a drop in donations for a while, just because they were so corporate
about this. Komen has been going to wind up corporating itself out and get
itself smacked down for it for quite a while. This was a symptom of an
ongoin
You got to admit at $500 a pop there's a lot of money involved.
Corporate greed? Isn't that the latest rallying cry?
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> And a hateful one at that. *Sells* abortions? Dude. That's harsh even given
> the author's affiliation.
~~
And a hateful one at that. *Sells* abortions? Dude. That's harsh even given
the author's affiliation.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> and an opinion piece is at the same level as a straight reporting
> piece. I guess that's OK if you're not concerned with trival things
Really? You're going to claim WaPo and Politico are Fact based
journalism without an agenda?
Read the opinion and dispute the facts in it.
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> and an opinion piece is at the same level as a straight reporting
> piece. I guess that's OK if
Your mistake.
This thread is about strong-arming a legitimate cancer foundation and
forcing them to support abortions.
Now breast cancer funding will go away because they likely won't
survive this radical attack but the good news is the nations largest
abortion center will now control the money m
and an opinion piece is at the same level as a straight reporting
piece. I guess that's OK if you're not concerned with trival things
like facts etc.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204369404577206692451108960.html
>
> .
>
>
> On Tue,
It gets better. I had wondered when the reich wing whinging would
begin. It did not take more than a couple of hours. I wish these
people would own up and take responsibility instead of blaming
everything else but their own behavior:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72570.html
Handel: P
Oops! You must have misposted in the wrong thread.
This thread is about the lack of transparency in grants within the Susan G
Komen foundation.
On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204369404577206692451108960.html
>
> .
>
>
> On Tue,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204369404577206692451108960.html
.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It looks like that Handel is out - she's the former GOP candidate who
> was instrumental in the Komen Foundation's decision to defund Planned
> parenthood
It looks like that Handel is out - she's the former GOP candidate who
was instrumental in the Komen Foundation's decision to defund Planned
parenthood.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/72550.html
ATLANTA (AP) A high-ranking official resigned Tuesday from the Susan
G. Komen for the Cu
I find it interesting that you charge anyone not a part of your little
group think is a troll.
But your little group think digs are very impressive. They make you
look smart, at least to the little group.
.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:09 AM, PT wrote:
>
> And the class troll doesn't respond to
In Eric's defense you seem a little slow witted yourself lately.
Must be the CA air.
.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Yeah! Those kinds of things make you look weak and slow witted. Stick to
> facts, mmKa
~~
Nothing.
It was a way of changing the subject rather than addressing the issue.
You folks love doing that.
.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> What does Fast and Furious have to do with either the Komen foundation
> or Planned Parenthood? Except in your little world tha
Meh. Arrow to the knew, nothing. this guy fought for 3 days with one
though a much more important part of his anatomy.
http://verydemotivational.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/demotivational-posters-tell-me-again.jpg
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, PT wrote:
>
> Hey now, be nice. They took an ar
Hey now, be nice. They took an arrow to those knees, you know.
On 2/6/2012 10:02 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Hey so, what about that cowardly Komen charity org? They cut funding, don't
> have the cajones to publically admit why, and then pretend to reverse it even
> though they really didn't.
>
And the class troll doesn't respond to the question asked as expected.
On 2/5/2012 8:29 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> And the class clown says something stupid as expected.
>
> .
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amaz
Hey so, what about that cowardly Komen charity org? They cut funding, don't
have the cajones to publically admit why, and then pretend to reverse it even
though they really didn't.
So clearly run by weak-kneed fools. Just sayin.
On Feb 5, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Even sadder
Yeah! Those kinds of things make you look weak and slow witted. Stick to
facts, mmKay?
On Feb 5, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You shouldn't enter every discussion calling people facist or nazis
> and expect to participate.
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Eric Roberts
> wr
What does Fast and Furious have to do with either the Komen foundation
or Planned Parenthood? Except in your little world that is.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> OK let's skip ahead to this congress. They're investigating fast and
> furious. It's seems that since the investigati
You know Sam you are making less sense than usual (if that is at all possible).
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Methinks you should start consulting with the ferrets before you post.
>
> .
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>>
>> I guess our really dumb cat
PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
Your response is congress does nothing good so you are always right?
Do you know Eric?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When Congress actually produces a solution to any of t
Methinks you should start consulting with the ferrets before you post.
.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> I guess our really dumb cat is like Sam then, he's never figured that
> out and keeps on chasing it and chasing it and chasing it...
>
OK let's skip ahead to this congress. They're investigating fast and
furious. It's seems that since the investigation started the program
has stopped. Lives saved right there. Existing problem thwarted.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> This Congress. Existing problems. Wh
I guess our really dumb cat is like Sam then, he's never figured that
out and keeps on chasing it and chasing it and chasing it...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah
that is also what McCarthy did, same tactics same odious attempt.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That what congress is doing.
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> There is no evidence that any of the Komen funds were used for
>> anything other than brea
This Congress. Existing problems. What does the Bill of Rights have
to do with that.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Let's start with the Bill of Rights and then work our way through the
> centuries.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> Even sadder is that
Let's start with the Bill of Rights and then work our way through the centuries.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Even sadder is that you will never realize why that statement makes
> sense, because you seem to be unable to recognize the difference
> between facts and opini
Even sadder is that you will never realize why that statement makes
sense, because you seem to be unable to recognize the difference
between facts and opinion. However, if you are convinced that the
fact as stated is wrong offer your proof.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Sad thi
Sad thing is you believe that statement makes sense. Even sadder is
other fools will high five you.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
> existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
> righ
Remind me when I see you to tell you the story of the cat and the dildo.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasi
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dana wrote:
> but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>> >
>> >
but usually cats figure it out after a day or two ;)
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
> >
> > On Sun,
Yeah, but it's funny as hell to watch him run in circles chasing his tail.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser poin
quickly tiresome and ultimately pointless?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser pointer.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout an
Yeah, it's the same kind of fun as teasing the cat with the laser pointer.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout and gets upset.
~|
Order the Adobe Cold
please don't confuse Sam with facts. He starts to pout and gets upset.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
> existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
> right or wrong. Facts are facts.
>
and you certainly are opinionated. I wonder if there is a connection.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You know what they say about opinions?
> ...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
>> po
No. I am saying that the statement "Congress has solved none of the
existing problems" is a fact. It has nothing to do with me being
right or wrong. Facts are facts.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Your response is congress does nothing good so you are always right?
> Do you kno
the point is, Sam, that it was one part of a primary care visit. You're
belittling a group that provides primary care where it's needed, and you're
saying the *left* is looking for a boogeyman? Go be outraged about people
who aren't saving lives, Sam.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Sam wrote:
And the class clown says something stupid as expected.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 8:01 PM, PT wrote:
>
> No. No. You need to answer in Sam-think.
>
> Ahem.
>
> So, are you saying this is a real problem?
~|
Order the Adobe Col
Your response is congress does nothing good so you are always right?
Do you know Eric?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
> problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
> their current recor
Yeah, we've been over this. There other services have little to do
with breast cancer funding. The mammogram they sent you for at a
reduced price was paid for by the State. It's good to know they told
you where to get it done but they don't get finders credit. The breast
checks are good to have b
No. No. You need to answer in Sam-think.
Ahem.
So, are you saying this is a real problem?
On 2/5/2012 7:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
> problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
> their current record, it's a
When Congress actually produces a solution to any of the existing
problems facing the nation, you can label this opinion. Based on
their current record, it's a stone fact.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You know what they say about opinions?
> ...
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:
ok well, yanno... I'm speaking as someone who has been a Planned Parenthood
patient, and you aren't interested, which probably tells us everything we
need to know. But I'll explain this one more time. I show up and say yanno,
just got here, haven't made contact with the coumadin clinic, but I hav
no. Why should it be?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Is that a breast cancer treatment?
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I
> first
> > moved to California, which probably only saved
You know what they say about opinions?
...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
> political hay on this red herring nonsense instead of finding
> solutions for the real problems.
>
~~
The shoes and gloves fit in this case...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 4:38 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
if the shoe fits...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:26 PM
...and don't forget the millions spent of suing other cancer orgs for using
"For the cure"...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 3:47 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Susan G. Komen backs down on Pla
No, what Congress is doing is wasting time and taxpayer money making
political hay on this red herring nonsense instead of finding
solutions for the real problems.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That what congress is doing.
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>
I am responding to your comment in a non meaningful way?
On 2/5/2012 6:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> That what congress is doing.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14302721
That what congress is doing.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> There is no evidence that any of the Komen funds were used for
> anything other than breast exams and screenings. There is also no
> evidence, in spite of the political nonsense being spread by the
> opposition,
There is no evidence that any of the Komen funds were used for
anything other than breast exams and screenings. There is also no
evidence, in spite of the political nonsense being spread by the
opposition, that any taxpayer funds were used for abortions.
If you have proof, you should produce it.
Stating the obvious confuses you? It's the odds lar. It's known what
they do, it's just catching them at it. This is a distraction to take
focus away.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> so how does that demonstrate they they used fed funds for that. I
> though the whole
You just spin around until you get dizzy hoping nobody notices your lost?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> false equivalence argument. Like a 10 year old who says well the
> others are doing it.
>
> Sigh, just because other do such, does it make it right? Moreover in
I swear you guys are twins
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> if the shoe fits...
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=hous
Is that a breast cancer treatment?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I first
> moved to California, which probably only saved my life. The thing that
> really makes me angry about this latest post is that we've
The primary age group is teen to low thirties.
Yes they might have a few over thirty.
PP does not perform mammograms. And of you did tell me things before
they were wrong then too.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> No. Not at all. This money was mammograms. You are wrong both a
so how does that demonstrate they they used fed funds for that. I
though the whole idea of j'accuse went out with the execution of
Robespierre.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> 300,000 abortions a year and you don't think any Federal money wen
> towards even one?
>
> .
>
> On Sun,
false equivalence argument. Like a 10 year old who says well the
others are doing it.
Sigh, just because other do such, does it make it right? Moreover in
terms of what is spent on salaries etc., the Komen foundation has been
criticized multiple times over their inflated payroll.
On Sun, Feb 5,
You're turning an investment in curing breast cancer into a
contraception argument.
The Komen funds aren't intended to go to condoms or abortions.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Less than 4% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood involve
> abortion. The other se
if the shoe fits...
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> You shouldn't enter every discussion calling people facist or nazis
> and expect to participate.
>
> .
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> The clinic I used to ALSO provided ob/gyn care to many pregna
300,000 abortions a year and you don't think any Federal money wen
towards even one?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> and your hypocrisy make me laugh.
>
> That so called investigation has been shown to be entirely a political
> show by an anti-abortion fanatic.
Don't all charities have overhead and doesn't PP pay it's executives
huge salaries?
What was your point again?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> Sam do you understand what women's health is? Or what the mission of
> the Koman foundation is? Its not just funding for can
You shouldn't enter every discussion calling people facist or nazis
and expect to participate.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The clinic I used to ALSO provided ob/gyn care to many pregnant women
> throughout their pregnancy. They do support life if that's the choice.
You're using emotion rather than logic to attack. The issue is breast
cancer, but you made my point. Many younger women that aren't likely
to get breast cancer use PP.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> OMFG. Really? You turned it into abortions and you're coming down
Do you not now the difference between breast cancer and a pap smear?
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
> idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from the reich wing
> mantra of abortion that
who said they were doing research? They do basic doctor stuff, yanno, like
checkups? Duh.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> I love the fake outrage.
>
> My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
> are under investigation. Shouldn't charitable contributions
they are cheap if you need them to be, Sam. They'll ask for a certain
amount for an office visit -- which is rather low, around $45 as I recall
-- but if you can't pay it they will take what you can.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> One, we're discussing breast cancer.
> Two, the
it's not even just GYN care! They were keeping me in coumadin when I first
moved to California, which probably only saved my life. The thing that
really makes me angry about this latest post is that we've already had this
conversation and it's like I was talking to a wall when I told you before.
No. Not at all. This money was mammograms. You are wrong both about the age
group they serve and about the services they offer. They do primary care in
a lot of places; I told you that before.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> They don't need that small change. When a girl goes in
Less than 4% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood involve
abortion. The other services they do provide likely prevent more
abortions than all the rhetoric from the opposition. What is not
being said is that most of the opposition, especially that funded by
the Catholic church, is not j
and your hypocrisy make me laugh.
That so called investigation has been shown to be entirely a political
show by an anti-abortion fanatic.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> I love the fake outrage.
>
> My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
> are under
Sam do you understand what women's health is? Or what the mission of
the Koman foundation is? Its not just funding for cancer research. All
in all about 17% of the money raised by the Komen foundation goes to
cancer research, while another 13% goes for preventative services
which includes breast e
unity
Subject: Re: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
I love the fake outrage.
My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they are
under investigation. Shouldn't charitable contributions go to business that
aren't under legal investigation for the fraudule
The tax dollars subsidize them so they don't cost as much dumbass.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:42 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
One, we're discussing bre
Pap smears and breast exams are among the MANY services PP provides
besides abortion care.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 11:39 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
And they
mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 9:51 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: FW: Susan G. Komen backs down on Planned Parenthood
Sam, I tend to largely ignore most of the stuff you talk about because I'm
not interested in politics like you are ... but I find these co
OMFG. Really? You turned it into abortions and you're coming down on me?
Whatever dude.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> And they have $billions for that, mostly tax dollars.
>
> We're discussing breast cancer prevention and you're talking pap smears.
> Stay focused and stop bei
I love the fake outrage.
My view of PP is they are not doing breast cancer research and they
are under investigation. Shouldn't charitable contributions go to
business that aren't under legal investigation for the fraudulent use
of funds? I would expect at least that from my contributions.
To ma
One, we're discussing breast cancer.
Two, they are not cheap. They take tax dollars and charge for service.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
> idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from th
And they have $billions for that, mostly tax dollars.
We're discussing breast cancer prevention and you're talking pap smears.
Stay focused and stop being led by the fake outrage.
.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Sam, I tend to largely ignore most of the stuff you ta
Why are you shifting focus?
If SGK doesn't like PP's mission then they should simply own it and publish
their view. You just published yours. (sadly).
Komen's actions are cowardly and that should disturb you as much as your view
of PP disturbs me.
On Feb 5, 2012, at 7:34 AM, Sam wrote:
It is this sort of ignorance why I hold you in contempt. Have you any
idea about what Planned Parenthood does? Aside from the reich wing
mantra of abortion that is. Frequently it is the only provider for
women's health in many areas, and for women who are poor. Frankly Sam
you really need to try
Sam, I tend to largely ignore most of the stuff you talk about because I'm
not interested in politics like you are ... but I find these comments to be
so abhorrent and ignorant it warranted a response.
Since you aren't a woman though, I guess I need to take your view point
with a grain of salt as
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
