yep. plain text works, html doesn't
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:41:54 -0400, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok just changed the setting lets see
> http://www.hof.com
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
ok just changed the setting lets see
http://www.hof.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Yah, I think that's your culprit. Links aren't clickable in the html
mail, for me, but are in the plain text. Go figure.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:18:26 -0400, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is it a hof setting like html email vs. plain text?
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscript
is it a hof setting like html email vs. plain text?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Well..for some reason they aren't clickable for me either.
I'm on outlook 2003.
-Gel
_
From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
why arnt links clickable in gmail???
that bugs me...
im on firefox
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://
So, the best part of that, by far, is the audio. :)
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:59:26 -0400, Mike Townend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you seen the leaked footage of the batmobile in action?
>
> http://www.dtheatre.com/read.php?sid=2556
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fas
working fine for me in gmail on firefox.
Hatton
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:56:17 -0400, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why arnt links clickable in gmail???
> that bugs me...
>
> im on firefox
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[D
Have you seen the leaked footage of the batmobile in action?
http://www.dtheatre.com/read.php?sid=2556
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
why arnt links clickable in gmail???
that bugs me...
im on firefox
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Instead...it looks like this
HYPERLINK
"http://www.engadget.com/entry/7561235144612102/"http://www.engadget.com/entry/7
561235144612102/
-Gel
_
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.736 / Virus Database: 4
The excuse for the sorry state of the next batmobile (see earlier thread) is
that it was supposed to be a 'real' military vehicle that the army did not
accept.
Well no wonder!
Not when they could geet something looking like this!
HYPERLINK
"http://www.engadget.com/entry/8772346245623102/"http://
Sheelaa!
Sorry, long day here at the AREVA T&D Users Group
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
-- Carrie Fisher
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Walruses have tusks, too.
cfhelp wrote:
> We will call it the WartHog. Red?
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
-- Carrie Fisher
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I've ordered from nuffsaidcomics.com as well - they are good. My local shop
also does mail order and specializes in collected books:
www.comicopia.com
Jim Davis
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:41 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
Well - you do now. ;^) I've got them all.
Also the whole caboodle was collected into a very nice book. Most comic
shops and some book shops can order them for you -
Stop talking about imaginary animals, dammit!
Marwan Saidi wrote:
> I was thinking Puma, myself
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:53 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
>
I was thinking Puma, myself
-Original Message-
From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:53 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
We will call it the WartHog. Red?
Rick Eidson
Partner & CTO
ArcRiver Technology, LLC
ASP, PHP, PERL,
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:05 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116103
---
Yeah - it does strike me more as a "groundhogmobile". And green? It's a
law of nature - Batmobiles are supposed
Well - you do now. ;^) I've got them all.
Also the whole caboodle was collected into a very nice book. Most comic
shops and some book shops can order them for you - it's well worth the read.
Jim
> > It reminds me of the Batmobile from the later
> > post-apocalyptic series (I can't remember
One of the best - as is Miller's "Year One" which redefined Batman (and is
supposedly the main inspiration for this new movie).
In fact anything by Miller is great.
Jim Davis
> It reminds me of the Batmobile from the later
> post-apocalyptic series (I can't remember what it was called)
> excep
-Original Message-
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
How can they be trying to stay away from the 'comic book' feel when they
are making a movie based on one of the most popular
> It looks like something out of Dune mixed with something out of Star Wars.
Nah, for it to be something out of Star Wars, it'd have to have giant silly tube wheels (I mean really giant... giant hula-hoop friggin' wheels) or legs.
The Dune comment I agree with.
:-)
--
will
"If my life weren't
(which undid everything and more
that Burton did to distance the franchise from the public perception of
things like "Bat Shark Repellent" in Batman's utility belt. This
concern over the appearance of the new Batmobile really illustrates
that, IMO.
-Original Message-
From: Be
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116126---I just think it looks really ugly, and not batman like at all. What ties
it to the batman mythos?
Certainly not the shape.
If you click on one of the images of the batmobile, it opens into
further images of batman himself. His cape
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116123---wait until it jumps 40 foot in the air... like a fururistic space hopper
? ;)
http://www.dtheatre.com/read.php?sid=2443
Angel Stewart wrote:
> Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116101
> ---
> what an awful,
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116116---> As far as the ugly tank looking batmobile...remember that this movie
> (IIRC) is supposed to be a 'Year One' type story. The 'sleeker'
> batmobile wouldn't have come along until much later in Batman's career.
Why do you say that?
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116114---> > It reminds me of the Batmobile from the later
> > post-apocalyptic series (I can't remember what it was called)
> > except this one is car-sized instead of a big ol' tank.
>
> Do you mean the Frank Miller series? I think it w
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116111---yea, not a good omen for the movie...
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom
Angel, I'm with you. The Batmobile should be sleek, fast, and
gizmo-laden. Not an armored, jet-propelled dune buggy.
Outbound email scanned for vi
t;. So go the other route and make it a big ugly
looking tank thing :)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:07 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: The new batmobile.
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116106
-
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116107---I think its pretty cool. Now wheres the humongous?
DRE
www.webmachineinc.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116106---> It reminds me of the Batmobile from the later
> post-apocalyptic series (I can't remember what it was called)
> except this one is car-sized instead of a big ol' tank.
Do you mean the Frank Miller series? I think it was called "
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116105---On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:49:46 -0400, Angel Stewart wrote:
>
> what an awful, ugly vehicle.
> HYPERLINK
> "http://www.ugo.com/channels/filmTv/exclusive/player.asp?articleID=11829
>
> They are supposedly trying to stay away from the 'c
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116104---> They are supposedly trying to stay away from the 'comic book' feel of
> the movie, and make the Batman more realistic.
> But...this car sucks. It doesn't have anything to do with a 'Bat' look.
>
> I'm all for making it more realis
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116103---Yeah - it does strike me more as a "groundhogmobile". And green? It's a
law of nature - Batmobiles are supposed to be black.
That doesn't mean the movie will suck. but it's definitely the first chink
in the armor.
Jim Davis
[Tod
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116102---It reminds me of the Batmobile from the later post-apocalyptic series (I
can't remember what it was called) except this one is car-sized instead
of a big ol' tank.
Angel, I'm with you. The Batmobile should be sleek, fast, and
gi
Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:116101---what an awful, ugly vehicle.
HYPERLINK
"http://www.ugo.com/channels/filmTv/exclusive/player.asp?articleID=11829
"http://www.ugo.com/channels/filmTv/exclusive/player.asp?articleID=11829
They are supposedly trying to stay away from
36 matches
Mail list logo
