On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this be more appropriate on April 1st:
>
> http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php
>
> Or maybe on "Apryl Fyrst"?
>
> Stupidest friggin' thing I've ever heard.
>
> Jim Davis
>
Next up
Comedy Central ch
Well, a new Stargate series is coming out this year. I'm looking
forward to that...
Tonight's going to be good though...
-Cameron
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> It does not matter anyway. As of 11:00 PM EDT tonight, there will once
> again be nothgin worth wacthing
It does not matter anyway. As of 11:00 PM EDT tonight, there will once
again be nothgin worth wacthing on SciFi or SyFy or SighFigh or whatever
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Yes, changing the name of a geeky channel to be more "teen l33t" is
> just what will
Yes, changing the name of a geeky channel to be more "teen l33t" is
just what will make that channel less dorky and geeky - uh huh.
I wonder if the guy who came up with this has a "really cool" tattoo
of NKOTB on his arm. You know, since they were cool and trendy and
never going to change.
Seri
They are changing the name of the channel to
SyFy
Their reasoning is: they don't like the people that currently watch their
channel, want them to go away (because they are antisocial nerds), and hope
that the new viewers they attract don't realize that syfy is the same as
sci-fi.
On Fri, Mar
Ah. I missed the thread hijack.
2009/3/20 Erika L. Walker
>
> hehe
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, morgan l wrote:
>
> >
> > So WTF is wrong here? I don't get it.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impo
hehe
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:33 AM, morgan l wrote:
>
> So WTF is wrong here? I don't get it.
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doublec
So WTF is wrong here? I don't get it.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Deanna Schneider <
deanna.schnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure what bothers me most:
> >
> > 1. The fact that he essential called me a dysfunctional, anits
>
> Some balls on this guy, changing the spelling of the name of the channel
> and
> calling it a major achievement.
Give that man a multi-million dollar bonus!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dram
That is awesome!
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Deanna Schneider <
deanna.schnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure what bothers me most:
> >
> > 1. The fact that he essential called me a dysfunctional, anitsocial geek
> >
> > or
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure what bothers me most:
> >
> > 1. The fact that he essential called me a dysfunctional, anitsocial
> geek
> >
> > or
> >
> > 2. The fact that its true.
Or the fact that he thinks misspelling it will "fool" others into thi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> I am not sure what bothers me most:
>
> 1. The fact that he essential called me a dysfunctional, anitsocial geek
>
> or
>
> 2. The fact that its true.
>
Speaking of marketing screw ups. Who can spot the screw up here:
http://www.witouri
I am not sure what bothers me most:
1. The fact that he essential called me a dysfunctional, anitsocial geek
or
2. The fact that its true.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:57 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't this be more appropriate on April 1st:
> >
> > http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/0
> Wouldn't this be more appropriate on April 1st:
>
> http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php
>
> Or maybe on "Apryl Fyrst"?
>
> Stupidest friggin' thing I've ever heard.
Y am offyndyd!
I mean, seriously,
"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunct
Some balls on this guy, changing the spelling of the name of the channel and
calling it a major achievement.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Yeah, buy a channel named Sci-fi then by your own admission spend most
> of a decade trying to distance the network from fans of sci
Yeah, buy a channel named Sci-fi then by your own admission spend most
of a decade trying to distance the network from fans of science
fiction. Stupid does not begin to define it.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Jim Davis wrote:
>
> Wouldn't this be more appropriate on April 1st:
>
> http://w
Wouldn't this be more appropriate on April 1st:
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php
Or maybe on "Apryl Fyrst"?
Stupidest friggin' thing I've ever heard.
Jim Davis
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 sof
17 matches
Mail list logo