Uh, then why is he getting trounced? Missouri has swung red in last 10
years or so, and any candidate who can generate a run-of-the-mill
conservative campaign would have a good chance at getting elected. Akin
can't do that, because he's batshit crazy...so he's going to lose.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012
According to Real Clear Politics:
PollDateSample McCaskill (D) Akin (R)Spread
RCP Average 9/16 - 10/3 -- 45.843.5McCaskill +2.3
Rasmussen Reports 10/2 - 10/2 500 LV 51 45 McCaskill +6
PPP (D)*10/1 - 10/3 700 LV 46 40
Not much of a trouncing, an average of 2.3 points.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Real Clear Politics:
PollDateSample McCaskill (D) Akin (R)Spread
RCP Average 9/16 - 10/3 -- 45.843.5McCaskill
yeah, it's tightened up...scary that it's that close. He's still gonna lose
though.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Not much of a trouncing, an average of 2.3 points.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hopefully. But Akin is on the House Science and Technology Committee,
along with that other GOP Genius, Georgia Rep. Paul Broun
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82108.html).
No wonder this nation's dominance in science and tech are starting to decline.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:51
yeah, that boggles the mind.
His idea is a pervasive one amongst the general population though...this
idea that if something can't be proven beyond a doubt, that somehow this
means it's not science. The dumbing down of science education in this
country of the last few decades is probably partly
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:13 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, that boggles the mind.
His idea is a pervasive one amongst the general population though...this
idea that if something can't be proven beyond a doubt, that somehow this
means it's not science. The dumbing down of
That's akin to saying to saying all Dems support the KKK because they
elected Byrd.
.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Because he is saying exactly what his electorate want to hear.
There is a difference Sam, not your false equivalence. Byrd repeatedly
recanted his actions then, by both word and deed. Neither of these
two have done so, in fact they've reveled in their willing ignorance.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
That's akin to
By word only, and even then he slipped up. Nice try though.
.
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a difference Sam, not your false equivalence. Byrd repeatedly
recanted his actions then, by both word and deed. Neither of these
two have
How can someone so stupid be elected time and again:
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/10/12/1003121/todd-akin-no-science-behind-evolution/
Ive taken a look at both sides of the thing [evolution] and it seems
to me that evolution takes a tremendous amount of faith To have all of
the
Because he is saying exactly what his electorate want to hear.
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com wrote:
How can someone so stupid be elected time and again:
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/10/12/1003121/todd-akin-no-science-behind-evolution/
Ive
12 matches
Mail list logo
