It would have been useful to pay for gas. ;)
No problem. I understand the joke. If I couldn't laugh...
> Well, there is nothing to buy around there, anyway, so you don't need
> the extra money.
>
> (Sorry, bad joke)
>
> On 6/21/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, that was
Well, there is nothing to buy around there, anyway, so you don't need
the extra money.
(Sorry, bad joke)
On 6/21/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, that was fun. Anyone have some broken glass I can shave with? It
> might be more enjoyable.
>
> Thank you Katrina. No salary ad
That sucks.
Russel Madere wrote:
> Well, that was fun. Anyone have some broken glass I can shave with? It
> might be more enjoyable.
>
> Thank you Katrina. No salary adjustments for 2006.
>
>> I know, I just feel like being a dick today. I have my annual review in an
>> hour.
>>
Russe
Well, that was fun. Anyone have some broken glass I can shave with? It might
be more enjoyable.
Thank you Katrina. No salary adjustments for 2006.
>I know, I just feel like being a dick today. I have my annual review in an
>hour.
>
>>> Russel wrote:
>>> So which Hussein do you mean? Husse
Point is that's how the media often refers to him.
I can't spell his last name without looking it up so...
If I respected him I'd use his last name.
I don't call the president George.
On 6/21/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I'm not sure what your point is, but mine is this:
>
> It's polite to call thos
I agree. We don't go around talking about Adolf or Fidel
> -Original Message-
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm not sure what your point is, but mine is this:
>
> It's polite to call those you don't know by their last name. If they
> deserve your respect then you use
> Sam wrote:
> http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=Saddam&sa=N&tab=wn
>
I'm not sure what your point is, but mine is this:
It's polite to call those you don't know by their last name. If they
deserve your respect then you use "Mr." or "Ms." When you call
someone by their first name it implies a
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=Saddam&sa=N&tab=wn
On 6/21/06, Gruss Gott wrote:
> I maintain my pet peeve of people being on a first
> name basis with him)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209914
I know, I just feel like being a dick today. I have my annual review in an
hour.
>> Russel wrote:
>> So which Hussein do you mean? Hussein bin Talal, King of Jordan?
>
>Luckily we have context usage to guide us.
~|
Message: h
> gMoney wrote:
> "New Iraq"is that like New Mexico or New Jersey?
>
Depends on how the Iraqis want to approach their application for statehood.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209906
Archives: htt
> Russel wrote:
> So which Hussein do you mean? Hussein bin Talal, King of Jordan?
Luckily we have context usage to guide us.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209905
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion
So which Hussein do you mean? Hussein bin Talal, King of Jordan? Oh! You
mean Saddam Hussein, the Butcher of Baghdad. Remember that there was more than
one national leader with the name Hussein in that region.
>Yeah, all Hussein (I maintain my pet peeve of people being on a first
>name basis
"New Iraq"is that like New Mexico or New Jersey?
On 6/21/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > Paralyzed- but working on a nuclear weapon for the last twenty years.
> Yeah.
> >
>
> Yeah, all Hussein (I maintain my pet peeve of people being on a first
> name basis wi
> RoMunn wrote:
> Paralyzed- but working on a nuclear weapon for the last twenty years. Yeah.
>
Yeah, all Hussein (I maintain my pet peeve of people being on a first
name basis with him) did was provide a local threat against expansion
(which Iran wasn't keen on anymore anyway), but also engender
Paralyzed- but working on a nuclear weapon for the last twenty years. Yeah.
On 6/20/06, Vivec wrote:
>
> With saddam in power in Iraq, Iran was paralysed.
>
--
---
Robert Munn
www.funkymojo.com
~|
Message: http:/
With saddam in power in Iraq, Iran was paralysed.
On 6/19/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But this paints another story. Does this mean the Iraq war worked?
> They want to get along with us. Throw down the terror and live in
> peace?
Interesting story. So is this good news for the left or bad?
Here's how I remember the argument:
Iran is more dangerous than Iraq. We should have gone to war with them.
Iran had more to do with 9/11 than Iraq. We should have gone to war with them.
Most of the World Hates the US.
Because of the Ira
Because whenever you make a point about how bad things are in the Bush
administration their supporters usually seem to bring up Kerry or, especially,
Clinton. That was my wry way of broaching that
Howie
--- On Monday, June 19, 2006 7:36 PM, Robert Munn scribed: ---
>
> I am confused about
I am confused about how we got back to Clinton, but since you brought him
up, I am working on a second song. It isn't a complete re-write, just a
cover of Hank WIlliams' "Your Cheatin' Heart".
If you would like to talk about the Iranian offer in 2003, I am not all that
surprised that we rejected t
Person 1: "Bush is doing a terrible job"
Person 2: "Clinton, Clinton, Clinton..."
Person 1: "But, really...Bush is doing a terrible job"
Person 2: "Kerry, Kerry, Kerry...
Person 1: "ugh, nevermind..."
--- On Monday, June 19, 2006 12:45 PM, Robert Munn scribed: ---
>
> Who is this baby Jesus ca
Who is this baby Jesus cat and what does he have to do with Iran?
Oh, and I've been working on a new song (sung to the tune of "Kyle's Mom's a
Big Fat B!tch")
John Kerry is a big fat loser,
A big fat loser, a big fat loser,
John Kerry is a big fat loser,
A big fat loser, a big fat loser.
That's
You know you are just saying that because your guy LOST, LOST, LOST!
why do you hate baby Jesus?
;)
> Officials in US President George W. Bush's administration turned down
> a 2003 Iranian offer to begin talks with the US, recognize Israel, and
> end support of Palestinian terror organizatio
Officials in US President George W. Bush's administration turned down a 2003
Iranian offer to begin talks with the US, recognize Israel, and end support of
Palestinian terror organizations, The Washington Post reported on Sunday.
The proposal, which arrived via fax along with a letter of authen
23 matches
Mail list logo
