ge-
> From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:10 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: What is a voter to do?
>
>
> I did that too, and only the third party candidates were close.
> However, in a race as close as the California Senate r
..
No offense Maureen...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 1:10 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What is a voter to do?
I did that too, and only the third party candidates were close.
However, in a race as close as the California
Brewster's Millions is a great movie.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Jacob wrote:
>
> Vote for "None of the Above" ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:06 AM
> To: cf-community
Vote for "None of the Above" ;-)
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 8:06 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What is a voter to do?
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, I went to thi
]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:24 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: What is a voter to do?
That is funny. I just ran mine, and the LOWEST I got was a 55% (out of 5
candidates). The highest was 76%. And both the R and the D were withing 5
points of each other and me.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM,
I did that too, and only the third party candidates were close.
However, in a race as close as the California Senate race, I'm not
tossing my vote on a third party that has no chance of winning. So I
held my nose and voted for the lesser of two evils.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Scott Stroz
Couldn't get the app to work in any of my browsers. Might try it later
on my laptop. Nice grass though :)
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up
Is that the same as the Appalachia party?
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> the Mountain Party Candidate was most similar for Senate.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Ado
this is why third parties exist
/runs
sas
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
> ideals.
>
> Sadly, when I was done, the closest any
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
> ideals.
>
> Sadly, when I was done, the closest any candidate, for either office,
> came was 47
Just did that and the numbers are better...but not 'landslide'
territory - and the Republican candidate is still on top in House, but
the Mountain Party Candidate was most similar for Senate.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey wrote:
>
>> So, I went to this web site, http://www.
What I find odd is that for the House seat, the Republican candidate
is most similar to me, but for the Senate seat, the Democratic
candidate is.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> That is funny. I just ran mine, and the LOWEST I got was a 55% (out of 5
> candidates). The
> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
> ideals.
Slick interface, like the concept!
> Sadly, when I was done, the closest any candidate, for either office,
> came was 47%. 47 fucking percent
That is funny. I just ran mine, and the LOWEST I got was a 55% (out of 5
candidates). The highest was 76%. And both the R and the D were withing 5
points of each other and me.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:06 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> >
> > So,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
> a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
> ideals.
>
> Sadly, when I was done, the closest any candidate, for either office,
> came was 47%
So, I went to this web site, http://www.votesmart.org/voteeasy to get
a better idea of where my Senate and House candidates match up with my
ideals.
Sadly, when I was done, the closest any candidate, for either office,
came was 47%. 47 fucking percent. That means that no matter who I vote
for I a
16 matches
Mail list logo
