On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> You should attempt to influence what they perceive about you in order to
> influence their actions in your favor. In diplomatic terms, this means
> having a diplomatic corp that is able to build trust with their counterparts
> around the world
You should attempt to influence what they perceive about you in order to
influence their actions in your favor. In diplomatic terms, this means
having a diplomatic corp that is able to build trust with their counterparts
around the world, using personal relationships to influence reality.
Controll
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
...
> Read "The Art of War" to understand why you never give the enemy any
> information they can use.
Technically, you want to give them *lots* of information they /think/
they can use.
The idea is to get inside their OODA loop.
You want them
So therefore NO ONE can tell you that the diplomatic leaks did not damage
security, because no matter how well placed they are they would just be
lying.
In fact, the more credible the witness, the more likely it is to be a lie.
Therefore your statement becomes irrefutable.
nice.
lol
:-)
On 8 D
The State Department has been shuffling embassy staff all around the globe
in response to this cable dump. That alone is a serious disruption in our
diplomatic corps. Furthermore, do you really think Gates is going to admit
that the Wikileaks dump has damaged our security? Not a chance in hell. Ca
No our politicians took care of that long ago...
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Barnes [mailto:critic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 12:13
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Why the reaction of governments to wikileaks should scare the
hell out of you
"Gates is not
"Gates is not going to concede the US has failed. After all, one guy with a
$35 domain name and a keyboard can't make such a great country look like
it's run by bumbling idiots."
In modern politics, one must save face above everything else.
So, that doesn't mean Gates is lying. It just means he
>
> look like it's run by bumbling idiots. Can he?
>
"look like" ?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusi
Odd how I could go to jail for downloading those files but we can't
find a charge for the guy that released them. Try sharing a movie and
they take your domain. Priorities.
Gates is not going to concede the US has failed. After all, one guy
with a $35 domain name and a keyboard can't make such a
I don't agree with wikileaks releasing some of the information they
have released and I also don't agree with the response from
people/companies/our government to those 'leaks'.
Perfect example of where neither side is right.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> http://gizmodo.com/
http://gizmodo.com/5709194/the-reaction-of-governments-to-wikileaks-should-scare-the-hell-out-of-you
Wikileaks is a flawed endeavor represented publicly by a smug egotist. But
it deserves the respect and support of anyone who prioritizes the privacy of
individuals over that of governments.
For t
11 matches
Mail list logo
