>
> "C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!"
> - Cynthia Dunning
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 11:29 AM
> ....To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: for those of you who sai
but his family can ;)
On 7/28/05, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was an unofficial adage among the law enforcement officers that
> I worked with that a dead perp can't sue.
>
> -Kevin
>
> On 7/28/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Based on the evidence as stated previously, on
Let's hope they did since the London police announced that they have
had over 250 suspected-terrorists-in-the-subway incidents since 7/7
and in seven of them they almost shot someone in the head (not
counting the one where they did shoot someone in the head).
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/?feed=T
8, 2005 11:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: for those of you who said that guy in the bulky coat who
....jumped the turnstile deserved to die
There was an unofficial adage among the law enforcement officers that
I worked with that a dead perp can't sue.
-Kevin
.
There was an unofficial adage among the law enforcement officers that
I worked with that a dead perp can't sue.
-Kevin
On 7/28/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the evidence as stated previously, one could understand the
> police's actions. If it turns out none of the stated circumstanc
was listening to NPR yesterday and apparently numerous cities have
this policy. The just haven't had a suicide bomber yet.
Dana
On 7/28/05, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a difference between "waiting for all the facts to come in" and
> changing the facts as they were.
>
> Based on the e
But they are, now.
The latest arrest (of one of the known-but-failed bombers) was
accomplished by using tasers (rather than shooting to kill)
It looks like they learned a valuable lesson.
On 7/28/05, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not enough to 'think' someone's a terrorist or acting st
Blah! I agree with Jennifer.
And I don't think it was justified given the circumstances, which is
what a few people were saying in the previous thread.
Most of the early information on a situation are skewed by news
agencies toward hype and the image they want to project, but we can't
fault ours
Sorry, you only think you were kidding...
Get your facts straight...
--- On Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:37 AM, Jerry Johnson scribed: ---
>
> Well, I kidding said jumping turnstiles (and smoking on the platform)
> should be shooting offenses. But I was KIDDING.
>
> On 7/28/05, Howie Hamlin <[EMA
Well, I kidding said jumping turnstiles (and smoking on the platform)
should be shooting offenses. But I was KIDDING.
On 7/28/05, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *NOBODY* here said that he deserved to die.
~|
Find out h
*NOBODY* here said that he deserved to die.
--- On Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:10 PM, Jennifer Larkin scribed: ---
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1711303,00.html
>
> Won't it be interesting if it turns out that he really was wearing a
> jeans jacket and used a travel pass, not
There's a difference between "waiting for all the facts to come in" and
changing the facts as they were.
Based on the evidence as stated previously, one could understand the
police's actions. If it turns out none of the stated circumstances were
true, then you have to ask the question of just W
> Jennifer wrote:
> It amazes me that people fault me for wanting to wait until all the
> facts are out before judging things like this.
As one of the people of which you speak, my apologies :) <- puppy dog eyes
~|
Discover CFTi
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,22989-1711303,00.html
Won't it be interesting if it turns out that he really was wearing a
jeans jacket and used a travel pass, not wearing a bulky coat and
jumping the turnstile?
It amazes me that people fault me for wanting to wait until all the
facts are
14 matches
Mail list logo
