I think it simply gives them (law talkin' guys) one more thing to charge the exploiters with.
Lack of documentation might be more proveable.
Like charging people with tax evasion because they don't have a tax stamp on a bag of pot.
my USD0.02
will
>How does requiring more documentation of photo
so upset about laws that are intended to
> prevent sexual expolits of children?
> - Original Message -
> From: Bill Wheatley
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:55 AM
> Subject: Re: pain in the ass
> anyone you pay for their services (of b
The intentions of the bill, appear to me to be a ploy to help prosecutors who
want to do an end run around "community standards" and get easier convictions.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Graeme
The intentions of the bill are good. But the language of it is vague
enough that it'
then
the practicalities of has holes.
-Kevin
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:58:46 -0400, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are you so upset about laws that are intended to prevent sexual expolits of children?
> - Original Message -
> From: Bill Wheatley
> T
Yes, you are correct - duh :)
- Original Message -
From: Harkins, Patrick
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: pain in the ass
I think you mean exploitation...
>-Original Message-
>From: Howie Hamlin
>
>
I think you mean exploitation...
>-Original Message-
>From: Howie Hamlin
>
>
>Why are you so upset about laws that are intended to prevent
>sexual expolits of children?
Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e230)
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
munity
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: pain in the ass
Why are you so upset about laws that are intended to prevent sexual expolits of children?
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:55 AM
Why are you so upset about laws that are intended to prevent sexual expolits of children?
- Original Message -
From: Bill Wheatley
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: pain in the ass
anyone you pay for their services (of being naked) is
ehe
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
- Original Message -
From: Marlon Moyer
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: pain in the ass
At first I
-
From: Larry C. Lyons
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: pain in the ass
"But having to keep a link of every image ever used is going to be a
big pain in the ass."
A big pain in the ass - wouldn't that apply only to certain types of
At first I thought this was an extension of BrobBrob's toilet e-mail :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 10:43 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: pain in the ass
>
> http://www.ibill.com/news/Ti
"But having to keep a link of every image ever used is going to be a
big pain in the ass."
A big pain in the ass - wouldn't that apply only to certain types of
pron films and images?
larry
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:43:24 -0400, Bill Wheatley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> h
http://www.ibill.com/news/Title18USC2257.pdf
This is going to be a huge pain in the ass and not really help too much. Time to write a letter :>
I'll post it here for proofreading before i mail it off to the DoJ. Some of the rules are good like saying Drivers License & Passport only.
B
13 matches
Mail list logo
