see why I don't want some of these posts in my inbox? You wind up looking at
some pretty offensive stuff.
>Geez, all this talk about the blonde nightmare has soiled my GMail
>with ads for her books...cripes...
>
>
>
>will
>--
>
>"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
>and that would ju
veloper
>
>
>11820 Parklawn Dr
>Rockville, MD 20852
>(301) 770-9610 x 335
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:43 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging exper
She is doing what she thinks she needs to do. What anyone else thinks of her
actions or her sanity is not relevant.
::shrug::
>They are not her. She is not them. It hits everyone differently.
>She needs help, not ridicule. She is certifiable probably.
>
>tw
>
>On 2/2/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL
please leave me out of this ;) I don't want to be in a corollary with Larry ;)
>See Kevin, you forgot to preface your post with "Now, I know there are nut
>job assholes on the right too, but."
>
>It's the Larry-Dana corollary. (Used to be known as the "Yes Sam, we know
>Clinton did it too" c
I'm not sure if it is actually illegal to wear a t-shirt with a slogan on it to
the state of the union speech. If it is, I don't think it should be. However, I
find the fuss being made over the "Support our Troops" t-shirt to be quite
amusing. It seems only fair to me -- this is a public event a
yes, exactly ;) Guess we know where HE stands on freedom of speech, eh ;)
>I thought this was an interesting line.
>
>Young said he wouldn't be so mad if it were just Sheehan. "I totally
>disagree with everything she stands for," he said. But by removing his wife,
>Gainer's officers clearly "acted
Same with nuking the south :)
On 2/2/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Stevens, but it is against the law to advocate killing a supreme court
> justice.
>
> larry
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195601
Arc
bruary 02, 2006 2:49 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
> >
> > Forgot to add, at least Sheehan has the integrity to stand up
> > for her beliefs.
> >
> > Now as I was saying, given the choice, which
s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:55 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> why the insults?
>
> The point I was making is that Sheehan is no more of a media whore
> than many in the right w
se ex-Survivor stars, trying to hang on to their 15 minutes well past
their bedtimes.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:19 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
he's us
On 2/2/06, Tim Heald wrote:
>
> I think that she has plans, and knows exactly what she is doing.
She's talking running for congress against Sen. Feinstein. I think it
was Chris Matthews idea. :)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffus
I google media whore and Ann Coulter is not on the first page at all Larry.
However Cindy Sheehan checks in at #6
What are you googling? And I find it hard to believe you actually googled
her as you can't spell her name right.
> > why is it a dodge. it was a pertinent point. You said
> > Sheeha
he's using an old tactic, when you cannot give an adequate response,
use insults.
On 2/2/06, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Say it with me now LarryCoulter, C-0-U-L-T-E-R
> >
> > I don't know where you're getting Coulton.
>
> Now who is dodging?
>
> ;-)
>
> Geez, all this talk ab
Which makes for an interesting point because it basically verifies her as a
media whore windbag.as bad as Robertson or some other righties?
Nopebut one nonetheless.
And I agree, if Coulter (or whatever the phudge her name is) really
threatned a justice...she should be arrested. I've hon
> Say it with me now LarryCoulter, C-0-U-L-T-E-R
>
> I don't know where you're getting Coulton.
Now who is dodging?
;-)
Geez, all this talk about the blonde nightmare has soiled my GMail
with ads for her books...cripes...
will
--
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 3:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> left wing? right, and classic facism never had anything to do
> with coopting government to serve corporate interests.
>
>
Ann Coulter isn't on the first page...
-Original Message-
From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:04 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
And actually there is a story about Cindy Sheehan in th
Say it with me now LarryCoulter, C-0-U-L-T-E-R
I don't know where you're getting Coulton.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:55 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging
he representation that somehow he was right
> wing.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:57 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging exp
And actually there is a story about Cindy Sheehan in the 6th entry, called
Red State.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 3:00 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blog
> I've lost boys in Iraq and Afghanistan.
>
> Guys I knew better than my parents.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:31 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: state of the
s a disgrace.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> any of you all ever lose a son in war?
>
> to
You know the funny thing, when I googled Cindy Sheehan is mentioned on the
first page...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Forgot
Hmmm...I just googled media whore and she isn't even on the first page...
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:47 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
You said media
ion 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> You mean the she has the puppet strings of MoveOn.org and Code Pink?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: R
57 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> why is it a dodge. it was a pertinent point. You said
> Sheehand was a media whole so I goodled the phrase. Sheehan
> did not come up anywhere on the first page. Coulton did.
> Multiple
You mean the she has the puppet strings of MoveOn.org and Code Pink?
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Forgot to add, at least
; >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
> >
> > I tak
why the insults?
The point I was making is that Sheehan is no more of a media whore
than many in the right wing? coulton should be arrested for
threatening the life of a supreme court justice - after calling for
the assassination of Justice Stevens.
On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See K
Depends, which justice?
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> Forgot to add, at least Sheehan has t
I've lost boys in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Guys I knew better than my parents.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Nice dodge
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:47 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
You said media whore. And so I googled the phrase, coulter came up first.
On 2/2
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
> >
> > I take it you've
CTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> I take it you've never seen Katherine Coulton, Or Pat Robertson or
> [name your right wing media asshole here] lately?
>
> Lets s
eart broken mother who's gone off the deep end..
> >
> > sas
> >
> > Scott A. Stewart
> > Webmaster/ Developer
> >
> >
> > 11820 Parklawn Dr
> > Rockville, MD 20852
> > (301) 770-9610 x 335
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> >
See Kevin, you forgot to preface your post with "Now, I know there are nut
job assholes on the right too, but."
It's the Larry-Dana corollary. (Used to be known as the "Yes Sam, we know
Clinton did it too" corollary)
Seriously though...Coulton and Robertson weren't arrested the other da
nge left groups like MoveOn.org and Code Pink.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:31 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
I take it you've never seen Katherine Coulton,
eart broken mother who's gone off the deep end..
> >
> > sas
> >
> > Scott A. Stewart
> > Webmaster/ Developer
> >
> >
> > 11820 Parklawn Dr
> > Rockville, MD 20852
> > (301) 770-9610 x 335
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> >
media whore I have ever seen. Her 15 minutes
> ended a long friggin' time ago. She's a disgrace to her son.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:09 PM
> To: CF-Community
>
Her photo-op with Chavez was beautiful, wasn't it?
What's next, tea with Bin Laden?
>I don't know man.
>
> I honestly think she knows what she is doing, and what her son would have
> thought of it. I was able to meet some people that were in here son's
> unit,
> through protest warriors. They
hat she is doing.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:19 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> I wouldn't call her a media whore, any mo
02, 2006 2:19 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Now I' am sort of wondering why a senators wife was wearing a t-shirt to the
State of the Union Address.
I mean, a little class at least.
Must be the ex-stripper second wife.
> -
02, 2006 2:16 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> Yeah, because the President is in the Capital, what once a
> year? I'm sure that's why it's illegal.
>
> There's a time and a place for protesti
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:16 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Yeah, because the President is in the Capital, what once a year? I'm sure
that's why it&#
610 x 335
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 2:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
and a tshirt is a protest? a protest against what?
she was supporting the troops and her tits wit
. She's a disgrace to her son.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Yep, that's what I said.
On 2/2/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL
day, February 02, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> Exactly. Embarrassing the President is illegal.
>
> On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No,
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
>
> Exactly. Embarrassing the President is illegal.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195539
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 1:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Exactly. Embarrassing the President is illegal.
On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, she doesn't have the right to attend! S
No, protesting inside the Capital is...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:43 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
Exactly. Embarrassing the President is illegal.
On 2/2/06
Exactly. Embarrassing the President is illegal.
On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, she doesn't have the right to attend! She gave that up the minute she
> broke the rules.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists
From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
> They deserve to be kicked them out for wearing t-shirts to a formal event.
> :)
>
> On 2/2/06, Sandra
They deserve to be kicked them out for wearing t-shirts to a formal event. :)
On 2/2/06, Sandra Clark wrote:
> Actually the other woman who was asked to leave, but was not arrested was
> the wife of a Republican Congressman. He raised a stink in the house
> yesterday.
>
~~
I cannot see what the fuss is in either case. Neither person was
making themselves obnoxious, both were silent. From the report it was
the police who overreacted.
In regards to Sheehan and Young:
"The drama in cotton unfolded when Sheehan, who received a spectator
ticket from Rep. Lynn C. Woolsey
Indeed.sounds like both of the women got what they deserved, and should
be apologizing to the cops, not vice versa.
> What do you expect. Those in power get treated differently. Any
> capitol district cop is going to thing twice, then twice again before
> busting the wife of the former head
fe,
> > Gainer's officers clearly "acted precipitously," Young said
> >
> > So, its okay to have someone arrested that you don't agree with? But when
> > you agree with them its okay?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: G [mailto:[
t;
> So, its okay to have someone arrested that you don't agree with? But when
> you agree with them its okay?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:17 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: state of the uni
heh, just my annoyance coming through.
She's almost as annoying as the guy she rails against...Mr. Smirk.
> for being a fanatically freakazoidical boombastically weird red headed
> stepchild of satan?
>
> wow. didnt know that was an apologizable thing.
>
> great.
>
t when
you agree with them its okay?
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:17 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: state of the union 2006 a live blogging experience
because it's law now that everyone has to apologize to Cindy Sheehan eve
for being a fanatically freakazoidical boombastically weird red headed
stepchild of satan?
wow. didnt know that was an apologizable thing.
great.
On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because it's law now that everyone has to apologize to Cindy Sheehan every
> time they see her.
>
> > so th
because it's law now that everyone has to apologize to Cindy Sheehan every
time they see her.
> so then why has the DC police issued an apology, and blamed
> hypersensitive fuzzy interpretations of the rules as the reason
> she and the other woman were apprehended?
>
> conveniently bending the r
so then why has the DC police issued an apology, and blamed
hypersensitive fuzzy interpretations of the rules as the reason
she and the other woman were apprehended?
conveniently bending the rules for a bushier tomorrow!
tw
On 2/2/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, she doesn't have the righ
No, she doesn't have the right to attend! She gave that up the minute she
broke the rules.
No politically motivated t-shirts allowed. That seems like a pretty simple
rule to follow for a 1 hour long address. Her intention was obvious: break
the rule, get kicked out, play the victim card, try to
auto fuel-efficiency standards.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13767599.htm
> http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.
> cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
>
w00t!
~~~
Interesting sideshow:
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/13768131.htm
> http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.
> cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
&
I think so. The fact that they also ejected the woman wearing a "Support our
Troops" t-shirt put an interesting spin on matters though ;) By the way,
"bother" was supposed to be "both", freudian slip that...
Dana
>true. but who cares now... she didnt get to attend.
>and thats what was wrong.
/politics/13768131.htm
> >
> >> http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.
> >> cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
> >>
> >w00t!
>
>
ign.com/blog/index.
>> cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
>>
>w00t!
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195475
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists
/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
> >
> > w00t!
> >
> >
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195439
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/thr
Nice.
On 1/31/06, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
>
> w00t!
>
>
~|
Message: http://
http://www.revolutionwebdesign.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/1/31/State-of-the-Union-2006--a-live-blogging-experience
w00t!
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195328
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com
71 matches
Mail list logo
