> After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
> ready to build a new site that is sort of a cross between
> f*ckedcompany.comand ChexSystems.
Why do I recall seeing this thread some time back?
~|
Ad
> What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
> review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
> the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
> resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
> properly.
The way I understand i
Some of the issues I have encountered in the past is temp tech jobs
recruiting for other contractors an the other subcontractor being the
worst link in the chain.
I started working on a project once with about 50 people and most
contractors rapidly dropped off because of harsh treatment with
Sometimes it's best just to learn from your bad experiences and just
move on. Spending too much time stewing (in public) can be very
counter-productive.
-Cameron
Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
> After dealing with a few too many disreputable companies, I'm just about
> ready to build a new site that
Checkbox criteria would definitely make it much better.
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Joseph Smuzynski wrote:
> Trevor:
>
> That's an interesting idea. I'll admit the idea crossed my mind,
> but I
> quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity.
> Since many
> consultants
Trevor:
That's an interesting idea. I'll admit the idea crossed my mind, but I
quickly dismissed it, because of the name-mentioning necessity. Since many
consultants are individuals, or their business name is their name, it would
end up being finger-pointing. If we could come up with a way to m
What about the flip-side of that coin ... A site for employers to
review their contracted hire. Why not build both into the site with
the ability to tag them together and to facilitate conflict
resolution? This could be quite the lucritive venture if done
properly.
On 1/31/08, Joseph Smuzynski
It sounds like a lawsuit trap to me.
The only way to keep it factual is if you moderate posts and control
what people say. Once you do that, then you are no longer protected
under "safe harbor" provisions.
All that said, even if you're "in the right" in terms of free speech,
that won't p
*cough* liability *cough*
Seeing as how it is anonymous, companies would come after the site
owner for anything they feel is untruthful (you know, the beyond the
shadow of a doubt type thing). Be careful trying to recreate a
judicial court.
On Jan 31, 2008 5:05 PM, Joseph Smuzynski <[EMAIL PROTECT
This site sounds like it will take all of your time doing moderation.
One of my friends started a similar site but with mechanics.
Also you might run into problems with profitableness, because the best
advertising/sponsoring could come from someone who might have people
on your site who hate t
SiteVision has a full-time position for a ColdFusion developer on-site in
Roanoke, VA.
Candidate needs experience with XHTML, CSS, PHP, ColdFusion, XML, SQL,
JavaScript and FuseBox.
Please include any project management and/or development team management
experience.
Four year degree in compu
11 matches
Mail list logo
