Hi all -
We seem to be flogging this more than necessary,
so sorry if I'm just adding to that.
On 10/25/10 3:43 PM, Ben Hetland wrote:
I do believe, though, that ISO date/time strings do have a utility
in--or as part of-- textual metadata fields associated with such
coordinates, for instance as
Dear all,
I feel a little bit stupid, but I haven't found a standard name for
a local ("in-situ") measurement of liquid water content (expressed in
g/m^3).
I've found so far :
- atmosphere_cloud_liquid_water_content : But my measurements are
local, not vertically integrated.
- cloud_liqu
Dear Bruno
I may have missed it too, but I don't think it's there. I would think such a
quantity should be called
mass_concentration_of_cloud_liquid_water_in_air
for consistency with existing names.
Best wishes
Jonathan
___
CF-metadata mailing list
C
Dear Jonathan,
> [...] I would think such a
> quantity should be called
> mass_concentration_of_cloud_liquid_water_in_air
> for consistency with existing names.
I'm not the most experienced person in CF naming, but given the
definition of mass_concentration, and the usual name building rule
Meghan et. al:
I think we would be missing a great opportunity if we used only the
wave variables proposed below. We have good dynamical reasons to
think that waves are important in upper ocean dynamics and not just
for purposes of directing shipping or filling up mandated data bases.
I
