Dear all,
MyOcean project needs your help again.
We have identified a few variables which have no equivalent within CF
classification. This is quite problematic for us, as ordering and downloading
netCDF dataset is based on CF reference.
Then we propose to extend CF standard name table
Dear Olivier
number_content_of_icebergs (m-2)
That is consistent with existing names and makes sense but it's a bit
surprising, don't you think? Because icebergs are so large, it doesn't seem
obvious to talk about the number content of them; that idea is more applicable
to microscopic
Dear All,
I haven't received any replies to my request for advice on the
equivalence of the terms attenuation and extinction in relation to
the effects of atmospheric aerosol on optical radiation. However, I've
been speaking to colleagues at RAL and looking at the literature to see
how these
Dear Roy and Jonathan,
As I speak english like a spanish cow (it's a French expression..), I never
imagined this issue :)
I understand what you mean.
Content means a quantity per unit area.
I do not know how weird it can be to read something like 'content of icebergs',
I prefer let you
I had the same gut reaction as you and almost came up with the same response
until I read the definition Content indicates a quantity per unit area on
369 Standard Names. So, perhaps Olivier is being consistent and tha handful
of 'per_unit_area Standard Names are not.
I think Olivier is
