Dear Richard and others,
> If we tried to be prescriptive, it might either (a) prevent
> people from using CF, or (b) using it incorrectly, because it
> didn't quite fit their needs, but they didn't want to change
> how they did things.
or (c) using it incorrectly because they didn't quite unders
Sorry for the blocked link. The problem could be either that the visible URL
didn't match the link URL (thought I checked that but ...), or that the short
URL is immediately redirected by the service (using a 302 temporary redirect)
to a longer URL (http://mmisw.org/orr/#http://mmisw.org/ont/cf
> Would it be possible to link it from the CF standard name page until this can
> be done by PCMDI?
Of course you are welcome to link to it as desired. There is a more attractive
view Carlos put together using his prototype vocabulary browser -- that link is
http://mmisw.org/experimental/vbro
Hi Jonathan,
As you can tell, I'm still getting to grips with CF. Thanks for the explanation
and revised example. I can apply the same principle to specifying the depth of
our soil temperature measurements, so that's another question answered.
> You probably saw John Graybeal's posting
The lin
Dear Dan
> I found the list on the CF web site here:
> http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/docs/area-type-table.html
You probably saw John Graybeal's posting that he has put the up-to-date
list at http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/areatype.
> The only references to area_type in the CF conventi
Dear Ben
> > It imposes a small cost by increasing the number of standard_names that
> > have to be defined, but it's very easy to agree such pairs of
> > standard_names,
>
> If I could have a say on this, I would prefer that the standard chooses just
> one. Having the possibility of a dual set
Dear John
- Forwarded message from John Graybeal -
> I created an entry in the MMI ORR for the area types vocabulary:
> http://mmisw.org/ont/cf/areatype
>
> Click on the "Individuals" drop-down at the bottom to see a table of the
> individual area names.
That's great! Thanks for d
Hi Jonathan,
I found the list on the CF web site here:
http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/docs/area-type-table.html
However this looks to be much shorter than the list on github so I guess it
needs updating.
The only references to area_type in the CF conventions doc (v1.6) appear t
Hi all,
I think the CF convention document urgently needs updating to acknowledge the
existence of NetCDF4 features and take a stance on the interpretation of CF
within a NetCDF4 file. I see this as a first step before we consider whether
to use NetCDF4 features explicitly in the CF model. A
Jonathan Gregory wrote on the issue of "downward"
and "upward" as separate standard names vs indicated by an attribute:
> If it was a separate attribute, it could be omitted, and probably sometimes
> would be (even if that was an error).
I second that, and I have seen it happen with other attrib
10 matches
Mail list logo
