I've got several CF templates located in an NTFS protected web site. I'm
having some trouble getting the CF scheduler to run them and am wondering if
it could be permission related. If the templates are located on same
computer as the CF scheduler trying to run them, is it necessary to supply
Jim McAtee wrote:
I've got several CF templates located in an NTFS protected web site. I'm
having some trouble getting the CF scheduler to run them and am wondering if
it could be permission related. If the templates are located on same
computer as the CF scheduler trying to run them, is
As a side note, which would be easier. I would hide the scheduled task
template behind the webroot. This means that only the machine can
execute this cfml template, I am not sure why a scheduled task would be
needed to have validation, unless CF doesn't have this permission.
I would actually use
This is very interesting as it is a technique I currently use, any idea why
there
is such a performance hit?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 December 2001 21:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Session variables
I would presume, however,
That would be my suggestion as well, however there are many email
clients that can switch this off and hence the sender will never know. I
know outlook has the ability to switch sending anything back to the
sender if you don't want it.
So in short, a link on the page that the user can collect
hehe. Spectra
- Original Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 6:20 AM
Subject: RE: Session variables
This is very interesting as it is a technique I currently use, any idea
why
there
is such a performance
Request scope is used at runtime of the template and then is no longer,
and is only available to that application. Application variables on the
other hand can be seen be any user to this application.
-Original Message-
From: Aidan Whitehall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 9
But degrading the performance of the server :-)
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 2:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Session variables
You can actively make CFAS give each request a single threaded session -
effectively managing
My advice is this, if you need to share information across users then
use Application scope. Sure you will have to lock the variables, but it
also means that less memory is being used by the system. Remember that
client, session and normal variables take up extra space in ram. So if
its
And just to add Dave, that there are a lot of people that tend to think
that they can do everything in CF and sure there hasn't been anything I
can't do with CF. However there are many times when CF is not capable
and it takes a good developer to know the limitations of CF, I had a bit
of code
Well it's not what I would do, ever tried using the caching of the
queries. Sure it might take 2.5 seconds the first time after that, 0
seconds to recall. Just don't need all the extra coding that you put
into place that's all.
-Original Message-
From: Alistair Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL
Wouldn't work, in this case the page hasn't be rehit in the time out
period.
A method I might suggest is a Jscript that would maybe on each keystroke
go to the server as a hit, this is something that is a problem and my
best solution is to allow the creation of the newsletter in word or
notepad
Dear all,
I'm working on a webmail application and I want to give users the ability
to attach multiple files to there messages. I know how to do the server
part of this procedure but not the client side.
I can't get this to work with input type=file cause this only supports
one file at a time
Any good resources on this?
Steven D. Dworman
Web Consultant
Systems Administrator
Comspec International
phone: 248.647.8841
cell : 734.972.9676
Empower-XL
Software for Higher Education
Anyone out there have any experience using CF to interact with a GoldMine
database? I am wondering if it's possible.
- Sean
~~
Sean Daniels
Director, Engineering
Marketplace Technologies, Inc
(T): 207.363.7374
(C): 207.332.6340
(F): 240.269.6319
yes it's possible. You can use DBase drivers (not good) or you can upgra
de
goldmine to SQL and do it that way. If you can figure out Goldmines rath
er
difficult Primary key schema you can make it happen. There are a lot of
folks doing it with various 3rd party aps and you can find ideas on
I've done a little work with GoldMine. If I recall, I think the original
was in dBase, then they released it using MS SQL. If the db is SQL, they've
got an API written using MS SQL stored procedures. That seemed to be the
surest way of interacting with the db. I'm not a SQL guru... I did some
This is very interesting as it is a technique I currently use,
any idea why there is such a performance hit?
Well, yeah... any time you are copying a whole bunch of stuff from one
place to another, even just in RAM, there's gonna be a hit. The more
stuff the bigger the hit. Pretty basic, and
Good option, but the request scope is a memory killer - Spectra is based
on it and can suffer really bad performance at times.
I actually disagree; I started using the request scope when it was
introduced. I have no problems with it; however I will say that you need
to be extremely
I'm working on a webmail application and I want to give users the ability
to attach multiple files to there messages. I know how to do the server
part of this procedure but not the client side.
I can't get this to work with input type=file cause this only supports
one file at a time and I
The only non-applet (pure html and CF) method is to use multiple input
type=file tags on the form, then loop through them on the action
template. End result can look something like this demo page:
http://www.humankindsystems.com/images.htm
Ron Hornbaker
President/CTO
. . . . . . . .
I beta tested Spectra when it was first introduced, sure it is bloated
and slow. But all it is, was a way to show us developers how we could
enhance our own applications. The fact that it is totally written in
CFML will always create a performance hit because of its design.
Hopefully when it
I'm sure this has been discussed before on here but its appearance on
allaire forums has me disturbed. Is Coldfusion really dying? Has M$
and Java taken CF down to the point it can't compete? What is the
consensus with your hardcore CF'ers?
On 12/29/01, Fregas penned:
I'm sure this has been discussed before on here but its appearance on
allaire forums has me disturbed. Is Coldfusion really dying?
Nope.
Has M$
and Java taken CF down to the point it can't compete?
Nope.
What is the
consensus with your hardcore CF'ers?
That thread has 200 posts. Aren't those enough opinions for you?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Fregas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 10:06 PM
Subject: death of coldfusion
I'm sure this has been discussed before on here but its
You can never have enough opinions.
- Original Message -
From: Jim McAtee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: death of coldfusion
That thread has 200 posts. Aren't those enough opinions for you?
Jim
-
Hear, Hear. Bully on opinions!
I just took a job with an unnamed major employer with offices throughout the
US, Canada, and Europe.
From what I can tell, everyone uses Cold Fusion. I was hired to put together
Flash and JSP pages, but I was given three copies of CF5 Enterprise edition
and told
I see where a lot of people's discouragement in that forum thread of Cold
Fusion
is the cost of the server itself. What cost less for an organization, $15
00 for
a server and
200 hours of development time or a FREE application server 500 hours of
development time ? Not to mention the cost of
But what a lot of people are forgetting is that the .Net will not be
free!!
-Original Message-
From: Tracy Bost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 30 December 2001 5:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: death of coldfusion
I see where a lot of people's discouragement in that forum
29 matches
Mail list logo
