Paul,
CFLocation redirects header info to wherever you are pointing it to..
After all the query updates are done on the template.. at the end of code
execution.. you can code some Inline JavaScript
script language=JavaScript
Hi all,
I'm just working on porting our intranet (which is currently running
under CF5) to CFMX, and right off the bat I have a little strangeness
I have a query, Q_Changers which contains the names of files that need to be
copied, generating the query works fine, but the copy code...
CFMX automatically converts variables with dots into structures. I
wonder if cfdumping request.rootpath or request.Mirrordir might be
interesting.
-Original Message-
From: James Sleeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: jeudi 4 juillet 2002 18:35
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX bug ??
- Original Message -
From: James Sleeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: CFMX bug ??
CFLOOP LIST=#ValueList(Q_Changers.Name)# INDEX=file
CFFILE ACTION=COPY SOURCE=#REQUEST.RootPath##file#
Maybe it relates to the File scope which is deprecated in favour of the
cffile scope...
In the second case, #URL# might be the prime suspect for the same
reason.
-Original Message-
From: James Sleeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: jeudi 4 juillet 2002 18:59
To: CF-Talk
Hmm... Does that say that File is a keyword and you cant use it as
a variable in CFMX Java Architecture... Most likely so.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: James Sleeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 2:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX bug ??
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 7:04 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX bug ??
In the second case, #URL# might be the prime suspect for the same
reason.
Yes, duh, realised that as soon as I posted :-) Don't
I heard that on CFMX the loop over a list is deprecated..
Please say it ain't so!
Seriously ... if this is so my only question is why
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Pinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 4 July 2002 4:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX bug ??
I
Complex object types cannot be converted to simple values.
The Error Occurred in J:\InnovativeMedia\StaffAdmin\qry_husk.cfm:
line
71
Called from J:\InnovativeMedia\StaffAdmin\dsp_husk.cfm: line 6
Called from J:\InnovativeMedia\StaffAdmin\index.cfm: line 126
69 : CFOUTPUT
From the CFML Changes:
CFLOOPChanged: setting collection to a struct in cfloop is deprecated. Use
structsort() instead
..i'm wrong...the problem is on the struct...
- Original Message -
From: Whiterod, David (PLNSA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July
As far as I can tell file doesn't work, but cffile does.
Cheers
From: James Sleeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CFMX bug ??
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 19:15:39 +1200
Complex object types cannot be converted to simple values.
---
Currently in ColdFusion MX, you can create a variable with the same name
as
a scope (Application, CGI, Client, Cookie, Form, Request, Server, Session,
URL, or Variables). The created variable is only visible if the Variables
scope prefix is explicitly used; otherwise, an error
Not that a good check as some versions of software demand lower (and
higher) versions of the MDAC components. You can download COMCheck from
Microsoft : just search from the Homepage and you can find out what
version you are running.
It does pay to have the latest software installed, but
Could you post your code, I don't see why this wouldn't work.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 06:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Update with cflocation
I am doing some query updates and then following the processing with a
cflocation
Is your page that does the update a custom tag?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 10:27
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Update with cflocation
Could you post your code, I don't see why this wouldn't work.
Ade
-Original Message-
From:
Hi All
I am using CF5 and msaccess97 the server sits on a Windows 2000 platform.
When using the following code the database inserts two identical records
(all but the uniquieid) I have used debug and the insert stament in not
looping - it's driving me insane. I have heard this may be a bug? Dose
Can someone remind me the best way to remove white space?
Thanks
Kola
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
Try with CFSILENT
bye
- Original Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:35 AM
Subject: removing Whitespace
Can someone remind me the best way to remove white space?
Thanks
Kola
~lol~ That might be a bit extreme some of the time, seeing as it'll stop all
output
cfsetting enablecfoutputonly=yesSome cfoutputoutput and /cfoutput
some code/cfsetting
is always good too.
Try with CFSILENT
bye
Can someone remind me the best way to remove white space?
Stephen
Hi all,
We've got a system where we'd actually LIKE our users to be able to click
'back' and see the form they just filled out.
We're not using any of the no-cache header info, yet folks' browsers still
show 'Warning: This page has expired'.
How can we prevent this...?
Thanks,
Ian
No use back with history.go...
In the input set the value (first by default...)
Sorry but I'm still fighting with english
bye
- Original Message -
From: Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:52 AM
Subject: Get rid of Warning: This
I've been using it and always thought it reduced whitespace when wrapped
around cf code which does not display anything, however in testing I
don't see any reduction in whitespace. Is this what everyone else uses?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Pinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Thanks for looking at this. Seems the problem was related to running in
standalone mode. I've had a few problems with the standalone installation.
Now that I have completely uninstalled and re-installed using IIS it works
just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL
Kola,
I've been using it and always thought it reduced whitespace when wrapped
around cf code which does not display anything, however in testing I
don't see any reduction in whitespace. Is this what everyone else uses?
Yep... A combination of CFSILENT and CFSETTING keeps my generated
Stephen
when do you use one over the other? Do you use cfsetting when you
actually want to display something right?
(my templates need to go on diet ;-)
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 11:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
has anyone tried using the wbem and wmi w2k stuff with cf 5?
z
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ:
wbem
wmi w2k
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe:
Yep. Hrl ksir - ciyof7 and yyt68 with cf5 and wd40.
Cheers,
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
www.modelwarship.com
-Original Message-
From: Zac Spitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 9:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: WBEM - WMI with cold fusion
has anyone
WBEM : Web-Based Enterprise Managemen it is supposed to be provide a
mechanism for describing and sharing management information.
WMI : Windows Management Instrumentation, it allowa system components to
be monitored and controlled, both locally and remotely
Neil Clark
Team Macromedia
Jeez, my typing is bad today :-p
Neil Clark
Team Macromedia
http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
Announcing Macromedia MX!!
http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial/
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark - =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 12:58
To: CF-Talk
WBEM : Web-Based Enterprise Managemen it is supposed to be provide a
mechanism for describing and sharing management information.
WMI : Windows Management Instrumentation, it allowa system components to
be monitored and controlled, both locally and remotely
Thanks Neil...that is
Anyone know if you can change the table names that CFMX looks for when using
client variables in a database? We normally use table prefixes like:
applicationName.cdata
applicationName.cglobal
but CFMX doesn't see the tables...not too difficult to workaround but was
wondering anyhow...
With LoRCAT. Get a Beta copy at www.ProductivityEnhancement.com.
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
Productivity Enhancement, Inc.
http://www.ColdFusionTraining.com
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 770-446-8866
- Original Message -
From: Kola
Shameless :-p I like it
Neil Clark
Team Macromedia
http://www.macromedia.com/go/team
Announcing Macromedia MX!!
http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial/
-Original Message-
From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 14:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Actually, Ray Camden told us at CFUN02 that that is a typo and you can
still loop over a struct.
Sandy Clark
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Pinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:20 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX bug ??
From the CFML Changes:
has anyone tried using the wbem and wmi w2k stuff
with cf 5?
I've played around with it a little bit. For the most part, I wrote WSH
wrappers for WBEM and WMI functionality, and invoked the wrappers through
the WSC COM interface, since the Microsoft COM hierarchies tend to be
difficult for me
Before I re-invent the wheel does anyone have a UDF which calculates the
weekending date. (i.e. the Saturday).
Cheers
Kola
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
Hello all,
I currently use a verity to index about 7000 word documents - it works
well and even faster and less buggy in CFMX I have found. MY issue now
is that 7000 word documents are obviously quite space consuming. When
client saves a typical 4 page document non graphical - the thing still
We've got a system where we'd actually LIKE our
users to be able to click 'back' and see the form
they just filled out.
We're not using any of the no-cache header info,
yet folks' browsers still show 'Warning: This page
has expired'.
How can we prevent this...?
This occurs when the http
Yes, I would be suspicious that there may be something else going on also
..
What version of CF Server is this happening on?
Isaac
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
Could you post your code, I don't see why this wouldn't
work.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Paul Giesenhagen
Another thing to watch for is using cflocation inside a cftransaction. Yes I did see
a junior
developer we used once try this. It re-locates and thus never finishes the
transaction...w
;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
The only other thing I would check is if this might be running in a custom
tag and does the tag have an end-tag ( even if it wasn't intended to have an
end-tag ) ... based on the code I'm guessing it's not in a custom tag 'cause
I don't see any references to the attributes scope though that's not
Before I re-invent the wheel does anyone have a UDF which
calculates the weekending date. (i.e. the Saturday).
Try this:
functioin weekending(date) { return dateadd(d,7-dayofweek(date),date); }
Isaac
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
No custom tag is being used, just a straight forward insert
statement...aghhh
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 15:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Inserting two records
The only other thing I would check is if this might be
Isaac thanks just what I needed...
Kola
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 15:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Week ending UDF anyone?
Before I re-invent the wheel does anyone have a UDF which
calculates the weekending date. (i.e. the
cfquery name=insert datasource=#application.dsn#
INSERT INTO save_list (ldate, lname, list, luserid)
VALUES ('#ldate#', '#lname#', '#selected#', #session.id#)
/cfquery
Where are these values coming from? Prefix them like #form.value# and
see what happens.
Isaac thanks just what I needed...
Welcome... Just don't ask for WorkWeekEnding(date) ... :)
Which actually is probably in the datelib on www.cflib.org already. :)
Isaac
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
__
Your ad could be here.
Sorry already tried that, I might try the final option in a minute and
launch my pc out the nearest available window!!!
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2002 17:05
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Inserting two records
cfquery name=insert
Hi all,
Is it possible to use CF Server 5 on Apache 2.0? The install of CF didn't
detect Apache, and I am wondering what to do. Does support only cover Apache
1.3.X?
Thanks,
James
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert
Sorry already tried that, I might try the final option
in a minute and launch my pc out the nearest available
window!!!
Instead of doing that, since it's almost certainly not your computer's
fault, you might post the entirety of the form and action pages - if that's
simply too much text,
Is it possible to use CF Server 5 on Apache 2.0?
Yes
The install of CF didn't
detect Apache,
It's normaly...Apache should be configurated manually after the
installation...
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to
Speaking of MDAC... I've noticed a bit of an issue concerning OLEDB with
MDAC 2.7. When I call a SQL2000 stored procedure using CFSTOREDPROC and
return output variables with CFPROCPARAM set to out, all a get is a series
of chr(1)'s terminated by a null. If I flip the DB over to ODBC everything
Great! What do I need to do exactly? I assume I need to direct Apache to
pass .cfm requests to CF in the conf file. Is this correct?
James
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Pinelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: July 4, 2002 12:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF5 on Windows with
Is it possible to use CF Server 5 on Apache 2.0? The
install of CF didn't detect Apache, and I am wondering
what to do. Does support only cover Apache 1.3.X?
The Apache module provided with CF 5 on Windows only works with Apache
1.3.x, and MM hasn't said that they'll provide one for CF 5
Yes you must configurate the plug-in of ColdFusion 4 Apache
..if I find a tutorial I'll send you...
- Original Message -
From: James Milks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: RE: CF5 on Windows with Apache 2.0
Great!
Speaking of MDAC... I've noticed a bit of an issue concerning OLEDB with
MDAC 2.7. When I call a SQL2000 stored procedure using CFSTOREDPROC and
return output variables with CFPROCPARAM set to out, all a get is a series
of chr(1)'s terminated by a null. If I flip the DB over to ODBC
You guys put periods in table names? YUCK... That means you need a square
bracket around every table name... Not a very common practice...
What you COULD TRY is to create two views called CDATA and CGLOBAL as such:
CREATE VIEW CDATA AS
SELECT * FROM [applicationName.cdata]
GO
CREATE VIEW
No we don't use periods in table names...They're synonyms (at the db level).
Anyhow no biggie...the DBA will just create an alias...
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 1:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CDATA CGLOBAL
They may be commented out at the moment, since everthing is still being
built/tested, I'll have to check on Monday. Is this a known issue when
using OLEDB? Like I said ODBC works fine.
I haven't come across this before, since I usually don't use CFPROCPARAM
with output variables. Instead I
Last year, MM had one in the exhibit room.
- Original Message -
From: Mark W. Breneman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: DevCon 2002 info
Anyone know if there will be high speed access at the on site hotel
They may be commented out at the moment, since everthing is still being
built/tested, I'll have to check on Monday. Is this a known issue when
using OLEDB? Like I said ODBC works fine.
SET NOCOUNT ON is usually a good idea no matter what, but i think
its needed for OLEDB.
---
Outgoing
The problem with these type of org charts is that when a level has many
members it becomes very large for the screen. We had precisely that problem
where our support department has about 200 people and you end up scrolling
right.
The solution, for us, was to use theActiveX Tree Control which
62 matches
Mail list logo
