Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Paul Hastings
> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as > performance, you might find this link interesting: > > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html "interesting"? geez thats darned shocking. ms's jvm beats sun's on windows? its 5 times faster? i s

Re: Chatster on CFHUB

2002-12-24 Thread Taz
NuMedia Internet Inc, according to the copyright notice at the bottom Taz > NOBODY CAN HELP WITH THIS? DOES ANYBODY KNOW WHO OPERATES CFHUB.com? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription

Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Jesse Houwing
Paul Hastings wrote: >>That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as >>performance, you might find this link interesting: >> >>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html >> >> > >"interesting"? geez thats darned shocking. ms's jvm beats sun's

Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Paul Hastings
> They're comparing Java 1.0 to Java 1.1. shows you how much i know ;-) > So this comparison no longer applies, as CFMX runs on at least 1.3, and > even better on 1.4. yes i use 1.4.1 for its extra i18n stuff. > And those versions have improved drastically compared to Java 1.1 in the same pr

Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Jesse Houwing
Paul Hastings wrote: >>They're comparing Java 1.0 to Java 1.1. >> >> >shows you how much i know ;-) > > >>So this comparison no longer applies, as CFMX runs on at least 1.3, and >>even better on 1.4. >> >> >yes i use 1.4.1 for its extra i18n stuff. > > >>And those versions have improv

Re: Date Compare in SQL?

2002-12-24 Thread Taz
Doesn't MySQL have the DAY function? BTW: there's no need for the cfqueryparams, and you should be using a WHERE clause SELECT TicketID FROM Tickets WHERE MONTH(dateCreated) >= #DatePart("m", f_date)# AND YEAR(dateCreated) >= #DatePart("", f_date)# AND DAY(dateCre

Re: DateFormat in CFMX

2002-12-24 Thread Paul Hastings
> The Brazilian currency should be R$ 404,20 not R$ 404,2 thats because all the LS functions now rely on the underlying java. i just wish they'd dump the "officially" supported locales & just support what the jre's support. another funny thing i've just noticed, on my thai locale servers some date

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Christian Cantrell wrote: > I like the idea, too. Anyone want to add anything? How many people > use the cfform tag now, and how many more people would use it if it > worked in the manner described below? And how else would you want it > to behave? I never use cfform, and I doubt I would

Re: Date Compare in SQL?

2002-12-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Cedric Villat wrote: > > username="#request.dbuser#" password="#request.dbpass#"> > SELECT T.ticketID > FROM Tickets T > AND month(dateCreated) >= value="#DatePart("m", f_date)#"> > AND year(dateCreated) >= value="#DatePart("", f_date)#"> > ORDER BY T.ticketID > SELECTT.

Re: Date Compare in SQL?

2002-12-24 Thread Taz
Of course you don't need to split it into date parts anyway... Taz > Doesn't MySQL have the DAY function? > > BTW: there's no need for the cfqueryparams, and you should be using a WHERE > clause > > > SELECT TicketID > FROM Tickets > WHERE MONTH(dateCreated) >= #DatePart("m", f_date

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Cutter (CF_Talk)
Jochem and group, I completely agree. CFForm's implementation can be cumbersome, unintuitive, and sometimes downright buggy. I find it much easier, and more functional, to write my own form validation scripts. The little buzz I've heard about XForms sounds very promising, and I also think that

Re: Chatster on CFHUB

2002-12-24 Thread Clint Tredway
I wrote Chatster. I have taken that site down. if you would like the code for Chatster, let me know. - Original Message - From: "Eric Creese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 11:10 PM Subject: Chatster on CFHUB > NOBODY CAN HELP WITH TH

Re: Cold Fusion forum

2002-12-24 Thread paul smith
;-) At 09:57 PM 12/23/02 -0600, you wrote: >It uses Fusebox, but you might be able to get something useful out of >it. ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion

Re: Cold Fusion forum

2002-12-24 Thread Chris Montgomery
Tuesday, December 24, 2002, 9:16:46 AM, paul smith wrote: > ;-) > At 09:57 PM 12/23/02 -0600, you wrote: >>It uses Fusebox, but you might be able to get something useful out of >>it. Didn't mean to imply anything here. I actually use FB and love it, in fact I use the cited forum. The code and da

RE: Cold Fusion forum (OPEN SOURCE?)

2002-12-24 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
Chris, I've dealt with UBB, fuseTalk, ezBoard, and the old Allaire Forums. If I can say anything on the subject, it's that NO ONE has gotten it right (especially on the database end). Mike D said a year ago he was going to re-write the old Allaire Forums and eventually open source it. Which, stop

RE: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Matt Robertson
Jochem brings up a good point in that cfform's validation features are, IMHO, worthless. Whatever it is that replaces cfform, if anything, needs significant improvement on that score. I think that its time for CF developers to start looking at using Flash for components in sites. Due to bandwidt

RE: Cold Fusion forum (OPEN SOURCE?)

2002-12-24 Thread Timothy Heald
There are several open source CF projects underway at source forge. There is one called fb open forums, umm another CMS called comet I believe, as well as a url variable encryption one I worked on a while back. Kick it off bro :) Get something started, Sourceforge has a good management system fo

RE: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
There once was a product named Generator. It was good. Back before cf5 came out, there were some rumors that generator was going to be intergrated. But alas, it never came to reality. At this point, I would be really surprised if the next iteration of cf didn't have some major flash integration. I

Re: RE: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread ksuh
Right on with you guys about having flash components to replace the java ones. It would make a lot of people really happy (hint, hint, MM). - Original Message - From: Adrocknaphobia Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 10:08 am Subject: RE: Linking CF and Flash > T

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Matt Robertson wrote: > > I think that its time for CF developers to start looking at using Flash > for components in sites. Due to bandwidth and other considerations > we're not ready for entirely Flash-driven sites for the general > marketplace, but in my opinion developers should begin explori

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread ksuh
Jochem, are there any browsers out there that understand XHTML2? - Original Message - From: Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 10:32 am Subject: Re: Linking CF and Flash > Matt Robertson wrote: > > > > I think that its time for CF developers to start l

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Jochem van Dieten
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jochem, are there any browsers out there that understand XHTML2? No, the standard is only just shaping up. But with XHTML 1 browsers understood it way before editors such as CF Studio understood it, and I would prefer not to have that happen again. Jochem ~~~

RE: How to do this without the subselect?

2002-12-24 Thread Ian Skinner
Looks like you got the answer you needed with this problem, but I didn't a notice an answer to this question, why the following code didn't work, and was throwing the clientID error. If this has been solved already, pardon my repetition. There is a simple typo on the following code: should read

Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Jon Hall
Tuesday, December 24, 2002, 4:01:14 AM, you wrote: >> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as >> performance, you might find this link interesting: >> >> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html PH> "interesting"? geez thats darned shocki

SQL runs in Access but not CFMX

2002-12-24 Thread Scott Brady
I have a query which runs fine in Access (putting the generated SQL into Access) but CFMX returns an error. Here's the SQL: SELECT c.calendar_id, c.startDate, c.endDate, c.frequency_id, f.frequency, c.location, c.description FROM calendarTbl c INNER JOIN frequencyTbl f ON c.fr

Re: SQL runs in Access but not CFMX

2002-12-24 Thread ksuh
Hmm, wild guess, try replacing the double quotes with single quotes. - Original Message - From: Scott Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:36 am Subject: SQL runs in Access but not CFMX > I have a query which runs fine in Access (putting the generated > SQL into

RE: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Rick Faircloth
Flash needs to undergo some serious UI change to accomodate app development as opposed to animation/graphics development. The current UI is similar to what I use everyday for video production. For producing animated graphics for video, the timeline is necessary. For producing animated graphics in F

Re: SQL runs in Access but not CFMX

2002-12-24 Thread Scott Brady
> Hmm, wild guess, try replacing the double quotes with single quotes. > That was it. Thanks! It's always the simplest things . . . Scott --- Scott Brady http://www.scottbrady.net ~| Ar

Re: CFMX / JVM

2002-12-24 Thread Keith
> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as > performance, you might find this link interesting: > > http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html > Benchmarks from 1997, for history buffs I suppose. Aren't those OS/2 scores disappointing? ~~

RE: RE: MS CF?

2002-12-24 Thread info
I think the point was that he's not willing to or interrested in earning money at the expense of his principals, and so while he invests with the hope of earning money, he's not willing to invest in companies which he sees compromising those principals. How far are you willing to go to earn your

RE: RE: MS CF?

2002-12-24 Thread info
Original Message --- You can sit here and complain that MS is the bad guy, but they are not the company you have put your faith in. I know I have the unpopular view on this list as anti-MM, but I can tell you that if MS owned Flash, you wouldn't have to worry about it being sold

RE: RE: MS CF? (getting OT)

2002-12-24 Thread info
I don't remember the exact reasoning (something to do with the value of bonds and the rates they mature at being tied to the economy), but I do remember hearing on public radio ( Fresh Air I think ) that the leap a lot of people have been making to Bonds may actually be a bad thing. Iirc what th

RE: tag context

2002-12-24 Thread info
Hey Matt, I think that's pretty much what you get ... However, if you need to be able to get to it frequently, I'd create a UDF to traverse the cfcatch structure, 'cause that [2] isn't always 2 ... Because some cf errors don't produce any information about where the error is found, I created

Re: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Dec 24, 2002, at 10:56 US/Pacific, Rick Faircloth wrote: > While we're on the subject, why can't Flash do away with ActiveScript > and incorporate CFML somehow? I don't know that much about the use > of the languages, and why that wouldn't be possible, but I do know that > I'd probably

RE: Linking CF and Flash

2002-12-24 Thread Rick Faircloth
Therein lies the biggest hurdle for me, an independent developer who has to make money continuously since I have no salary; the complication involved with moving from dynamic apps based on a browser interface and CFML to Flash Remoting. Right now I simply have to know HTML and CFML. And 99% of th

RE: RE: MS CF? (getting OT)

2002-12-24 Thread Matt Liotta
If you reread my message you will see that I specified bond funds; not bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds offer daily liquidity the same as any mutual fund. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ 888-408-0900 x901 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAI

Re: tag context

2002-12-24 Thread Christian Cantrell
The UDF below returns the name of the current page (including the .cfm extension). When called from inside of a custom tag, it will return the name of the calling page (at least it did during my one quick test): function getCurrentPageName() { var pageContext = getPageCont