Re: CFSCRIPT and loop index values in variables

2005-07-24 Thread Pete Ruckelshaus
Thanks Barney, that was it! ~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message:

MAX eLearning Day

2005-07-24 Thread Connie DeCinko
Can someone provide some additional information about MAX eLearning day? Other than what is on the MM web site? I'm a bit fuzzy if I would benefit by flying in a day early to attend this event. Is this something a small shop that trains one or two users a month would benefit from? Constanty

SSL Debugging

2005-07-24 Thread Taco Fleur
I received some feedback from MM in regards to an issue I have been trying to tackle for a while now: Enable SSL debugging by adding in the following JVM argument for more info. -Dssl.debug=true This should write out to the standard out log. This will show in what CACERTS file Coldfusion is

Re: QoQ in CF6.1 - I give up

2005-07-24 Thread Douglas Knudsen
What I have done with these wierd QofQ issues is to wrap TO_CHAR() around my attributes in the original SQL. (using Oracle here) The JDBC drivers then handle it all as text, but CF numerics still work on the attributes, som emajic casting in CF, eh? Sorting maybe an issue, hasn't bothered me

how much cfc overhead?

2005-07-24 Thread Dov Katz
I have a cache similar to the cf_scopecache, though my objects can be stored to file, memory as text, memory as a query, or memory as a cfc. I have a gallery cfc which holds an array of photo cfc instances. Real simple, an id, file path, folder path, and friendly names for both object types.

Re: QoQ in CF6.1 - I give up

2005-07-24 Thread James Holmes
If you created the query with querynew(), you aren't able to do any of this in 6.1. That's one of the reasons I'm creating the UDF. Also, the sorting is corrected in my technique. On 7/25/05, Douglas Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I have done with these wierd QofQ issues is to wrap

Re: how much cfc overhead?

2005-07-24 Thread Barney Boisvert
CFCs are definitely heavier than POJOs, however, much of that's at the class level, not the instance level. If you go look at the generated ..class files, you'll see that a CFC generates a class for the CFC itself, and then another class for each function. So if a given CFC will always require

Re: how much cfc overhead?

2005-07-24 Thread Paul Kenney
All instances of a particular CFCs share a single object for each of their methods. So, a CFC is essintially an object with references to *singleton* method objects. Very efficient use of memory. On 7/24/05, Barney Boisvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CFCs are definitely heavier than POJOs,