Re: Sticking with CF...

I've been with AFP Webworks (Mike Kear) for several years and am very happy with the arrangement. The MX7/SQL2005 support is exactly what I needed. PT www.actcfug.com ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:2

Re: Sticking with CF...

And Rick if you do this and use Access i'm gunna come beat ya over the head!! ;) ~Dave - formerly known as "the disruptor"~ From: "Mike Kear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... Rick, I'l

Re: Sticking with CF...

Rick, I'll offer you a free playground. You're right, I'm trying to run a business and it's not very businesslike to give free product away, but you're a special case.I think the CF7 is reallly worth the upgrade, and as Ray said, the CFDUMP is worth it all by itself. But I'll give you a free

Re: Anyone use JSMX and could answer a question?

>From what I saw you had returntype="void" which won't allow you to get a result, or shouldn't...CF may be faulty in this manner. I've never tried to return a result from a function set to void. I see the example has void. I'd change it though. Also, do you have an Application.cfc setup? If so, do

RE: Sticking with CF...

Thanks for the tip, but I'd need the Enterprise version for the number of sites I host...how much is 1.600 Euros (?) in US Dollars? Rick -Original Message- From: Gert Franz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... Did

RE: Sticking with CF...

Good info...thanks for the help, Eric. Rick -Original Message- From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Sticking with CF... The trial version is a full version...no limits, other than it lasts for 30 days. The dev ver

Re: Anyone use JSMX and could answer a question?

Most people are using ajaxCFC these days. On 6/16/06, Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made a post on the Google forums for JSMX but I'm not sure how often > then get used: > http://groups.google.com/group/JSMX/browse_thread/thread/64b04123336694b3 > > Anyone have input on this they

RE: Sticking with CF...

> How do you know that in cf 4.5 it was a simple variable? Because, if you tried to treat it as a structure, it would fail. > Were you not able to do my.var2="bar", etc... Well, sure, but that doesn't mean that "var1" and "var2" are keys within the structure "my". > doesn't' cf 4.5 automatica

Re: Sticking with CF...

Did you consider using Railo? There are a couple of hosters who provide Railo hosting. And you can use the community version for free in the way you like (except redistribution). It is almost fully MX 6.1 compatible and the prices of the professional versions are starting from 300$... Just tak

RE: cfe cfc invoking

For creating bean's, I'm a big fan of the cfe code generator to get most of the code written for you. When building other CFCs, the generator can be helpful if you've planned out exactly what methods your going to have. My two cents, Rich -Original Message- From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: Sticking with CF...

The trial version is a full version...no limits, other than it lasts for 30 days. The dev version allows for 3 ips as stated below and to flush them, the service must be restarted. Other than that limitation, it is a full version of the server product. Eric -Original Message- From: Ray

RE: Sticking with CF...

You can also dl the trial and play around with it to see the differences. After 30 days, the trial becomes a developers edition. Eric -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 15 June 2006 12:22 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... if yo

RE: Sticking with CF...

That is not totally true...cfgraph does not work anymore...it was replaced by cfchart. You will get an error. Rick...since you are coming from 4.5, this will not effect you... Eric -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:

Re: Galleon users & mderating users

Nick Tong - TalkWebSolutions.co.uk wrote: > might be worth checking out Rick Roos version of *CFMBB * I'll save him the time - it's not in there.. yet ;) Currently there is no post moderation but it'd be really easy to add it.. probably what I'd do would be to add topic_moderation and post_mode

Re: window.getAttention flash/blink icon/sys tray...

Correct, it won't work from web content: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/DOM:window.getAttention On 6/15/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey guys. > does any one of a function to flash an icon on the system tray. > > i have a pop-up message that i am sending to all intranet users

RE: Sticking with CF...

I guess I could get a plan from hostingAtoZ and put the old sites under development names and see how they run...well...after looking at their plans, I'd have to go for the highest plan ($65 or so per year, which still isn't bad at all) to get 10 MySQL databases, which still wouldn't be enough to t

Re: Sticking with CF...

I wouldn't worry about it. I've been using cf since version 1.5 and I can count the number of times I've used CFGrid on one hand (with a few fingers left to spare). You really shouldn't run into any significant issues with older code. As has previously been mentioned, most (if not all) of the dep

RE: Sticking with CF...

Maybe I'll just continue to run 4.5 on one web server and run the 4.5 sites on that and setup a second server to run CF 7 sites that I build...then I don't have to worry about compatibility...I can do that since I'm not actually "upgrading" at $1300. I might as well buy a full-version... -O

RE: Sticking with CF...

Thanks for the advice, Ken... -Original Message- From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... Well, that's not entirely true. You're going to find quite a few tags and/or tag attributes that, while they

RE: Sticking with CF...

CFGrid...another one of those tags I've never used...guess I have some things to look forward to. :o) Ya think? Rick -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... As I said, tho

RE: Sticking with CF...

Whew...no problem there...never used that naming method... -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... also if you have any variables with periods in the name... in CF 4.5 creates

Re: host does not offer cf mappings

I should also mention this application is already written calling cfc's & custom tags as follows: myObject = CreateObject("Component",request.cfcMapping & "myCFC"); And I am tied to a host who does not offer CF Mappings. They say "ColdFusion >mappings will not function on our system due to its hy

host does not offer cf mappings

I am tied to a host who does not offer CF Mappings. They say "ColdFusion mappings will not function on our system due to its hybrid architecture". I don't want to put CFC's & ini config files or custom tags inside the web path, so what options do I have besides using a different host? Thank you,

Re: Announcing ColdPDF

Cool, so will this be like a replacement to ActivePDF? I did some research on iText, and found something I've been trying to do with CF and PDF's for a while now, which is generate 2D(pdf417) barcodes inside a pdf, dynamically from form data passed in. So if I'm able to access that iText functio

RE: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

> I wasn't sure if you where insulting me Dave ;) > > Thanks for the suggestion but as Joe pointed out the docs > come with the download. Not an insult, just a suggestion. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorize

Re: Search Engine Optimization

glad to help - another cool site for this web is: The Scrutinizer, this will allow you to see your site and validate your site for Browser Compatibility , Accessibility, load times, etc. On 15/06/06, Ben Nadel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nick, > > That i

3-D charts with cfchart

I can't seem to get cfchart to show 3-D data with arguments like: show3d="Yes" xoffset="-1" yoffset="-1 I would like to show multiple sets of data in 3-D rows ... mountain range effect. Does anyone know if this is possible? Rick Colman

RE: SQL DateTime conversion

> -Original Message- > From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:50 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: SQL DateTime conversion > > Pretty much what I cam up with > > SELECT CAST(MONTH(getDate()) AS VARCHAR(5)) > + '/' + CAST(DAY(getDate()) AS VARCHAR(5))

Re: Galleon users & mderating users

might be worth checking out Rick Roos version of *CFMBB * On 15/06/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before I go having to write an extension to Ray's Galleon forums that > allows for individual moderation of users? It's been requested that the > "head admin" be able to place some

Re: Galleon users & mderating users

You know, if you have to write something...start by poking around the notification code, right? There's "subscription" code that sends users email notifications when a new post is made to a thread they're "subscribed" to...I'd figure that might be a nice place to begin looking...seems like you'

Re: Sticking with CF...

Russ: In CF 4.5 you had to explicitly create a structure. I'm not sure about CF 5...but it wasn't until MX that you could implicitly create a struct without the structNew() function. in CF 4.5 would create a simple variable called my.var in the local (variables) scope. On 6/15/06, Russ <[EMAIL

Re: Documentation Software Needed..

Hi Guys As Bob has mentioned RoboHelp(now Captivate) is the route to go. Thanks Jose Diaz On 6/15/06, Robert Everland III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Viewing the source of that site shows that they are using RoboHelp which > just so happens to be an Adobe product. > > > > Bob > > ~

Re: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

I wasn't sure if you where insulting me Dave ;) Thanks for the suggestion but as Joe pointed out the docs come with the download. On 15/06/06, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hey Joe - thanks for all your hard work, I'm looking > > forward to getting my hands on this. Any chance that

RE: SQL DateTime conversion

>Can I ask what DBMS you ae using? and also what you then need to do with >the date field? SQL Server 2000. I'm doing an insert from one table to another. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243670 A

Re: SQL DateTime conversion

Can I ask what DBMS you ae using? and also what you then need to do with the date field? On 6/15/06, Ben Nadel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can try doing > > SELECT > CAST( > ( > STR(MONTH( date_field )) + '/' + > STR(DAY( date_field ))

Anyone use JSMX and could answer a question?

I've made a post on the Google forums for JSMX but I'm not sure how often then get used: http://groups.google.com/group/JSMX/browse_thread/thread/64b04123336694b3 Anyone have input on this they'd care to share here on on that thread?

Re: Sticking with CF...

No, it sure didn't. In the code that Andy just sent, you'd not ever see "it exists" in 4.5 because it wasn't a structure. And yeah, you could create my.var2 and set it equal to bar, but that would just be another local simple variable. You couldn't, for example, loop over the keys of "my". ***

Re: SQL DateTime conversion

Pretty much what I cam up with SELECT CAST(MONTH(getDate()) AS VARCHAR(5)) + '/' + CAST(DAY(getDate()) AS VARCHAR(5)) + '/' + CAST(YEAR(getDate()) AS VARCHAR(5)) On 6/15/06, Ben Nadel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can try doing > > SELECT >CAST( >( >S

Re: Sticking with CF...

But there were tons and tons of cfquery tags in sites built pre-MX which cited the "provider" and "providerDSN"... which will actually throw a CF error when run in MX+. Now, I don't remember how many and which attributes were actually valid back in 4.5; it's been WAY too long since I've used it

RE: SQL DateTime conversion

You can try doing SELECT CAST( ( STR(MONTH( date_field )) + '/' + STR(DAY( date_field )) + '/' + STR(YEAR( date_field )) ) AS DATETIME ) AS the_date FROM [table] There's probb

RE: Sticking with CF...

How do you know that in cf 4.5 it was a simple variable? Were you not able to do my.var2="bar", etc... doesn't' cf 4.5 automatically create a struct as well the way cf mx+ does? > -Original Message- > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:34 PM

RE: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

> Hey Joe - thanks for all your hard work, I'm looking > forward to getting my hands on this. Any chance that the > documentation can be available offline? > As i do a lot of my RnD stuff commuting? wget? Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides th

RE: Sticking with CF...

my.var isnt' a structure and if you try to reference it as such you'll get odd results. it exists is a good example. -Original Message- From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:28 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Sticking with CF... What is the diffe

Re: Sticking with CF...

on is a "simple variable" and one is a "complex object". yes, they'd be referenced the same...but I think it's worth knowing :) On 6/15/06, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the difference between those 2? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Sticking with CF...

What is the difference between those 2? > -Original Message- > From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:53 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Sticking with CF... > > also if you have any variables with periods in the name... > > in CF 4.5 creates a

SQL DateTime conversion

I need to convert a Date Time (9/15/2006 11:05:38 AM) to a date (9/15/2006 ) within an SQL statement. The source of the data is from within the SQL statement and I don't want to do any looping so your standard CF functions don't apply. Is this possible? Lee ~~~

Re: Documentation Software Needed..

Viewing the source of that site shows that they are using RoboHelp which just so happens to be an Adobe product. Bob ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:243657 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_

Re: Announcing ColdPDF

I don't know much about your product to answer that, but if you've copied the majority of ColdFusion's funcitonality I don't see why not. I'm just initializing the iText jar to do the heavy work, the ColdPDF cfc is merely an easy way for anyone to take advantage of the power of iText. Bob ~~

Re: Sticking with CF...

As I said, those would require LITTLE coding changes. A var changing to a structure would still be referenced the same way, and CFGrid, ugh, well that's assuming he's using it, it still won't be much to change it. Not like having to change say a cfquery tag throughout the site. I wouldn't worry

Galleon users & mderating users

Before I go having to write an extension to Ray's Galleon forums that allows for individual moderation of users? It's been requested that the "head admin" be able to place some forum users on probation, so that their posts are filtered through him first. I thought if anyone else out there alr

RE: cfUNITED-talk?

I think I'm in with you mark. There's really more than cocktails there? C'mon, you MUST be joking! Rich -Original Message- From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 1:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cfUNITED-talk? There are presentations?!! Gawd, I thought

Re: Announcing ColdPDF

Hi Robert, could you Imagine, that your CFC would be good for Railo too? (www.railo.ch) We are planning for the 1.1 release almost the complete 100% MX7 compatibility... Regards Gert Greetings / Grüsse Gert Franz Customer Care [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.railo.ch Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie

Re: Sticking with CF...

also if you have any variables with periods in the name... in CF 4.5 creates a local variabled called my.var. in MX+ it'll create a struct called "my" with a key called "var" :) On 6/15/06, Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, that's not entirely true. You're going to find quite a few

RE: CF MX6 to MX7 upgrade uses old data sources?

> I updated a machine from Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 > (server) and then ran the install for CF MX7. I think it did > a side by side install with MX6. > > The web site, an intranet, is now running from MX7, except it > seems to be using the MX6 data sources for MS Access databases. > > A

Re: Sticking with CF...

Well, that's not entirely true. You're going to find quite a few tags and/or tag attributes that, while they can still be used, will act in a very different way in the later versions. For instance, I don't think that cfgrid will work correctly on the later versions with the code written to use

RE: Sticking with CF...

I didn't test on a prod server for a few years, but once I became more comfortable with my coding, as long as I wasn't doing anything too risky, it was just lot simpler setting up paths for images, etc., which might have to be changed for the prod server. Probably just poor development practice on

RE: Documentation Software Needed..

I am also in the market for such a beast if someone could recommend a few they might have used. Eric J. Hoffman Managing Partner 2081 Industrial Blvd StillwaterMN55082 mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.ejhassociates.com tel: 651.717

RE: Sticking with CF...

I don't think that will be a problem...I've never created a variable called "URL"... -Original Message- From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:16 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Sticking with CF... What do you mean by "poorly scoped"? Has the use of the

RE: Sticking with CF...

Very good... -Original Message- From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:15 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Sticking with CF... So, to make sure I understand correctly...up to two visitors (external to my network) could visit a site at a time... Yup, and

RE: Sticking with CF...

Very nice... -Original Message- From: Nathan C. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:04 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Sticking with CF... In addition there is an upgrade tool that will look through all your code and tell you where compatibility problems are. I

Re: Sticking with CF...

You understand correctly, although I don't agree with your testing of code on a prod server, but that's not the issue here. :) Rick Faircloth wrote: > So, to make sure I understand correctly...up to two visitors (external > to my network) could visit a site at a time... > > If so, that's good, b

RE: Sticking with CF...

What do you mean by "poorly scoped"? Has the use of the URL variable changed somehow? No, but some people would create their own local variable and name it "URL". This was and is a bad idea. -- Ian Skinner Web Programmer BloodSource www.BloodSource.org Sacramento, CA -

RE: Sticking with CF...

So, to make sure I understand correctly...up to two visitors (external to my network) could visit a site at a time... Yup, and with a reset of the Cf service, a different two can visit. -- Ian Skinner Web Programmer BloodSource www.BloodSource.org Sacramento, CA - | 1 | |

RE: Sticking with CF...

Ummm...I use URL variables all the time...do you mean variables contained in a URL such as /cat.cfm?cat_id = getcats.cat_id ??? I use those all the time to create update and delete links from lists of items...surely that's not what you're describing... What do you mean by "poorly scoped"? Has

RE: Sticking with CF...

So, to make sure I understand correctly...up to two visitors (external to my network) could visit a site at a time... If so, that's good, because I learned a long time ago that what's good on a dev server isn't always good on a prod server... That's why I don't even bother with a dev server anymo

RE: Sticking with CF...

In addition there is an upgrade tool that will look through all your code and tell you where compatibility problems are. I think that was introduced in CF5 -Nate > -Original Message- > From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:40 PM > To: CF-Talk

RE: Sticking with CF...

I mean is the dev version of CF 7 somehow limited to localhost use only? Or could I put sites live on the Internet by running CF 7 on a web server? With a limitation of 1 IP or something like that? Rick You get 2 non-local IP addresses per cf service start up with the dev version. ---

RE: Sticking with CF...

Good to know...first I'll have to find out what "createObject()" is... :oP Why do I get the feeling I'm starting all over learning to build dynamic web sites with CF? Is it really going to be that different? CFC's, etc...(I've only read about them :o) Rick -Original Message- From: Ch

Re: Sticking with CF...

the only major issue will be with variable scoping. Poorly scoped variables in the past can cause issues (do you ever use a local varaible called URL for example?) On 6/15/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, that's certainly good news. I was very concerned > about having to reco

Re: Sticking with CF...

Three IPs can access the server, including 127.0.0.1, so technically two. So, I'd assume, if you only had one IP that was hitting that box, then, yes, you could. Just remember that when CF starts up, it grabs the first two IPs that hit it, and temporarily saves them. I think you have to resta

RE: Sticking with CF...

Well, that's certainly good news. I was very concerned about having to recode all the websites I have built and still host on 4.5. Rick -Original Message- From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 1:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Sticking with CF

Re: Sticking with CF...

I am, but have yet to transfer my domain over. So technically I can't comment on their uptime...but I can tell you that in getting set up, everything was a breeze. In order to use createObject() they needed to set me up a sandbox...which they did within an hour of my request. On 6/15/06, Rick F

RE: Sticking with CF...

> > Is there a way to use a dev version of CF 7 to put stuff live on the > > Internet if I set a new server (hardware) to run it? > I'm not sure I understand what you mean here... I mean is the dev version of CF 7 somehow limited to localhost use only? Or could I put sites live on the Internet b

RE: Sticking with CF...

Thanks for the referral...prices are certainly good. There don't appear to be any limitations on CF 7 functionality. I use MySQL and would get 1 database. I guess you're using them, Charlie? Rick -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June

Re: Sticking with CF...

The administrator is just about exactly the same, minus some style sheet changes and new options. It hasn't changed much from the 3.0 days if not earlier. You should be able to run all of your existing code under CFMX 7 with little or no changes. All of the tags that have been deprecated still

Re: Sticking with CF...

Rick Faircloth wrote: > What about administration of the server? Is that comparable > to 4.5...I'm sure it's changed a lot... I'm not sure I even remember about administering the 4.5 server, to be honest. I *can* say that it is very easy to administer the server on 7, though. Painless and sim

Re: Sticking with CF...

if you want a cheap host just to play around with CFMX 7 and get an idea of the capabilities... check out http://www.hostingatoz.com/ best prices i've seen, and very nice response times on support tickets. On 6/15/06, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe you're right, Ray. > >

RE: Sticking with CF...

What about administration of the server? Is that comparable to 4.5...I'm sure it's changed a lot... The only drawback I can see to using a dev version locally is not being able to see my results on the Internet and perhaps others viewing the work. Is there a way to use a dev version of CF 7 to

RE: Sticking with CF...

I believe you're right, Ray. Mike, or whoever offered, is that offer still available? I am willing to pay...don't to bother someone as a freeloader. I know it takes time and money to run a server. Thanks for the reminder, Ray... Rick -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[

Re: CFQuery simple but not working, strange

>>SQLselect * from app_users where UID = 271 Looks like you've got a http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. ~| Message: http://www.houseof

Re: Sticking with CF...

BTW, since the old CF4.5 days where installs were a real hassle, CF has come a long way. You should be able to install the dev version of CF7 on your laptop within minutes, with about 10 clicks. It'll take you longer to download it than install it. Rick Faircloth wrote: > Alright.I'm convince

Re: Sticking with CF...

I thought one of the guys on the list offered you a free (or cheap) space on one of their boxes to experiment with CF7. (I'm thinking Mike Kear?) Glad to hear you're thinking about making the jump. is worth the upgrade itself! Rick Faircloth wrote: > Alright.I'm convinced.after working with

Re: cfe cfc invoking

Dave, You'll find the Component Browser in the newer nightly builds (the newest nightlies only work with Eclipse 3.2). From there, you can browse your projects and components and double-click to generate and insert the appropriate cfinvoke tag for a chosen method. -nathan strutz http://www.dopefl

Sticking with CF...

Alright.I'm convinced.after working with ASP.NET 2.0 and the free MS development tools, and especially after reading the TechRepublic article that Greg referenced, I think sticking with CF is the best route. However, as some of you know, I'm still using CF 4.5 and it's still doing everything I'm a

Documentation Software Needed..

Can anyone recommend a utility (CF based) that can allow a small team of developers to create / document their applications? I am looking for something free/cheap but costly solutions I am not ruling out just yet. I am looking for something like this http://www.red-gate.com/help/sqlbackup/sqlback

Re: announce: ColdFusion Cookbook hits 100

Yep. When the text list becomes larger its usefulness will decline. Large things like big text lists should always be handled in small chunks. On 6/15/06, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can see that - but I'd consider that a bit different than a cookbook > style guide. > > Btw

RE: CFQuery simple but not working, strange

UID may be reserved but you can try: [UID] = #URL.dupid# -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:21 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFQuery simple but not working, strange Hey All, Argh! I've stared at this error for 10 minutes a

RE: CFQuery simple but not working, strange

Maybe try this: 500 : select * 501 : from app_users 502 : where [UID] = 503 : ... Ben Nadel Web Developer Nylon Technology 350 7th Avenue Floor 10 New York, NY 10001 212.691.1134 x 14 212.691.3477 fax www.nylontechnology.com "Some people call me the space cowboy. Some p

CFQuery simple but not working, strange

Hey All, Argh! I've stared at this error for 10 minutes and i can't see what' wrong with my query. This query is checking to see if a username already exists before adding a new username to the app_users table. UID is the primary key in the app_users table and URL.dupid is the triggered red

Re: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

Yep, working on it :) On 6/15/06, Damien McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hotdiggedydog. Awesome! > > Now that MG has such lofty features, care to do a comparison between > it and Ruby on Rails? I'm think a short comparison listing features > they have in common and things that separates the

Re: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

Yup - learn either. On an API level, there's not much difference between the two other than the tag and the generic database messages (see MG2 docs for explanations of each: http://docs.model-glue.com). The main difference is that the block in MG1 ModelGlue.xml files is now in a separate file (

Re: Stuck cfmail

On Thursday 15 June 2006 15:03, Brian Palmer wrote: > web servers are suffering the same problems. Anyone have an option? Anything in the mail log ? If you sniff the traffic from the CF box to the mail server, what's it doing ? -- Tom Chiverton *

window.getAttention flash/blink icon/sys tray...

hey guys. does any one of a function to flash an icon on the system tray. i have a pop-up message that i am sending to all intranet users. and say some one has there browser open to the intranet but it is behind another application they are using. i would like to force the pop-up to the for ground

RE: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

What I'd like to know is if I should hold off learning MG 1 until MG 2 is ready for primetime. Is the coding similar enough that I could learn MG1 and I would know MG2 well enough to keep going? -Original Message- From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 20

Re: Model-Glue:Unity Public Beta 1 is Available

Hotdiggedydog. Awesome! Now that MG has such lofty features, care to do a comparison between it and Ruby on Rails? I'm think a short comparison listing features they have in common and things that separates them would suffice. -- Damien McKenna - Web Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Limu

Re: SMS Gateway won't start

Do you hae the SMSC Test Server running (start from the Admin)? The SMS Gateway needs to bind to an SMSC server that talks SMPP. The test SMS Phone Client (Java app launched from your ColdFusion start menu) then talks to the SMSC Test Server as well. So the order is: 1) Start the SMSC Server

RE: ADSI, AD, and COM objects in VB

Take a look at this zip file: http://acelinkdev.evansville.edu/hoflists/cfandvbcom.zip There is a readme file in it. I created the COM object in VB6. I'm not using .Net yet. It doesn't say how to create the COM object, but it says how to register it with the OS for CF's use. If you open the p

RE: Search Engine Optimization

Rey, Thanks man I will check out this stuff at lunch... Work just go in the way ;) ... Ben Nadel Web Developer Nylon Technology 350 7th Avenue Floor 10 New York, NY 10001 212.691.1134 x 14 212.691.3477 fax www.nylontechnology.com "Some people call me the space cowboy. Some

RE: Search Engine Optimization

Nick, That is hands down the coolest tool I have seen this week It really shows you what your site has and more importantly, does NOT have. My world has been officially rocked. Thanks! ... Ben Nadel Web Developer Nylon Technology 350 7th Avenue Floor 10 New York, NY

Stuck cfmail

Hi all, Have searched through some threads here and haven't found quite what we need. Our Spool folder started filling up around 7am this morning. Nothing was going to our Undeliverable folder and it just kept backing up in the Spool folder. I went through the Spool folder, no 0 byte files. Ch

  1   2   >