Re: Stupid mistake :)

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
I would think this is a good situation for pragma=no-cache. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Al Musella, DPM wrote: > >Just wanted to mention it so others don't repeat it. > I have a webpage that lets you scroll through a few pages of listings > with a previous 50 / next 50 button. Someone

CFGRID width

2010-10-06 Thread Glyn Jackson
in CF9 using CFGRID, for some reason I cannot get it to be 100% the width of the cflayout. I know you can set the width but it's in px which is no good to me. i would like it i could make the width just 100% but its not accepted. any other way to make the with 100% of when inside a cflayout ~

Stupid mistake :)

2010-10-06 Thread Al Musella, DPM
Just wanted to mention it so others don't repeat it. I have a webpage that lets you scroll through a few pages of listings with a previous 50 / next 50 button. Someone complained that the page was being cached on their phone and they were seeing old data. I couldn't reproduce the problem,

RE: CF wait for rendering?

2010-10-06 Thread Jason Durham
Thanks Jochem. -Original Message- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:joch...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:10 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: CF wait for rendering? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Jason Durham wrote: > Message The resource I:\temp\148B8F9B-9360-3A68-13B177C57

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Dave Watts
> No, actually not, unless I missed it. Evaluate is against my religion, > but I might make an exception if there isn't any other way and I care > enough. It's an odd language feature to work around, > argumentCollection (args by name) exists, but there's no positional > equivalent. It's not that

Re: CF wait for rendering?

2010-10-06 Thread Jochem van Dieten
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Jason Durham wrote: > Message The resource I:\temp\148B8F9B-9360-3A68-13B177C579EF0537.pdf was not > found. > Detail The root cause was: ''. > > One event fires to create a PDF and send an email (with attachment).  I'm > wondering if is trying to attach a PDF tha

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
No, actually not, unless I missed it. Evaluate is against my religion, but I might make an exception if there isn't any other way and I care enough. It's an odd language feature to work around, argumentCollection (args by name) exists, but there's no positional equivalent. Thanks, Dave On Wed,

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Hmmm, not sure what you mean by "build a method call to the original > method, and write the values positionally by iterating through the > array". Do you mean write it out to disk or VFS? I'd thought of that, > but wasn't super fond of the idea, since unless I'm missing something, > you'd have

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
You're right, I did misread your last post, sorry. But it's still not super practical as a generic SES-URL-to-method-call dispatcher, unless I'm still not getting what you mean. You'd need to inspect each method before you called it to find out how many args it takes, pad the array out that far, a

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
Hmmm, not sure what you mean by "build a method call to the original method, and write the values positionally by iterating through the array". Do you mean write it out to disk or VFS? I'd thought of that, but wasn't super fond of the idea, since unless I'm missing something, you'd have to do that

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
Re-read my last post. If you know that the method will accept x number of arguments. And your array may have anywhere from 1 to x possible values then write a function to pad your array with (x - arraylen) null values. Like this: On Wed, Oct

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Missing the point. The method already exists and has other callers, > who pass separate arguments by name or position. I'm not redesigning > its API to take an array of arguments. I want to generically pass in a > set of ordered arguments to it. How about writing a new method that takes two arg

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
Missing the point. The method already exists and has other callers, who pass separate arguments by name or position. I'm not redesigning its API to take an array of arguments. I want to generically pass in a set of ordered arguments to it. Dave On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Michael Grant wrot

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
I gave you a perfectly viable, easy to implement solution. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, enigment wrote: > > Imagine an SES URL processor somewhat analogous to what Django > provides, with a regex match that captures specific segments of the > incoming URL and passes them to the requested

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
Imagine an SES URL processor somewhat analogous to what Django provides, with a regex match that captures specific segments of the incoming URL and passes them to the requested method. Yes I know about ColdCourse, and the related ColdBox plugin etc, I was just thinking about alternate approaches.

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
It's also pretty unusual to not have any idea how many arguments you are passing into a method. There are many more elegant approaches to your switch suggestion. The primary one being writing code that has structure and passes in the expected amount of arguments each time. Another one would be tha

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
It's unusual for a method to take an array of its arguments, rather than individual ones. Situation is something like a dispatcher; the methods already have defined arguments, say Widgets.search(widgetName, widgetCategory, widgetID). It'd be pretty weird for it to take an array containing those th

Re: Any way to prevent storing methods inside of an array

2010-10-06 Thread Judah McAuley
Thank you Dave, that was very succinct and helpful. Cheers, Judah On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Dave Watts wrote: > >> Matt, do you know of a good rundown on the difference between This and >> Variables scope in a CFC? I have a basic understanding of it but it is >> always been something I wa

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
Dave, Why don't you just pass in the array? On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:38 PM, enigment wrote: > > @Michael: What I'm looking for is the positional equivalent of > argumentCollection. If it wasn't for that, you'd think the same about > passing a structure of arguments -- any object yo

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
@Michael: What I'm looking for is the positional equivalent of argumentCollection. If it wasn't for that, you'd think the same about passing a structure of arguments -- any object you pass will be treated as a single argument. But argumentCollection trumps that. I even tried a structure with keys

Re: Any way to prevent storing methods inside of an array

2010-10-06 Thread Tony Bentley
Okay, let me come up with something that would explain my situation better. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive:

RE: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Jason Durham
Whoops.. read the rest of the email below. var I = positionalArgs.iterator(); var arg = ""; while( i.hasNext() ) { arg = i.next(); SomeComponent.someMethod(arg); } That will call someMethod() for each array value. You could use a For loop with "i LTE arrayLen(positionalArg)" if

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
As you can see anything you put in the args that's derived from CF is going to be treated as arg1. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz

Re: Any way to prevent storing methods inside of an array

2010-10-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Objects have methods. If you store objects, they still have methods. > Why do you think this could be a problem? > > You haven't explained what you're trying to do and *why* you think > having the methods callable is... anything other than expected > behavior. > > Sorry if I'm not being very hel

Re: Any way to prevent storing methods inside of an array

2010-10-06 Thread Dave Watts
> Matt, do you know of a good rundown on the difference between This and > Variables scope in a CFC? I have a basic understanding of it but it is > always been something I wanted to make sure I understood the fine > distinctions in, kind of like the difference between var scoped > variables and th

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
So parse the list inside your method. Or create an argument collection out of your array and pass it in. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM, enigment wrote: > > Thanks for chiming in Michael. > > Using ArrayToList would pass all three values as a single string. I'm > looking for a generic way to

RE: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Jason Durham
This is untested... SomeComponent.someMethod(evaluate(ArrayToList(positionalArgs))); -Original Message- From: enigment [mailto:enigm...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:48 AM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: Positional argument collection Thanks for chiming in Michael. Using A

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
Thanks for chiming in Michael. Using ArrayToList would pass all three values as a single string. I'm looking for a generic way to pass each array element as an individual argument, regardless of how many there are. Take another look at the examples I gave. Dave On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:02 AM,

CF wait for rendering?

2010-10-06 Thread Jason Durham
I've run into a situation where this exception is being thrown... Message The resource I:\temp\148B8F9B-9360-3A68-13B177C579EF0537.pdf was not found. Detail The root cause was: ''. One event fires to create a PDF and send an email (with attachment). I'm wondering if is trying to attach a PDF

Re: Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Grant
I'm not exactly sure what you're asking but would some variation of this work for you? SomeComponent.someMethod(ArrayToList(positionalArgs)); Of course you may need to qualify the list etc if you are passing strings, but I think that suits your example. On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:54 AM, enigmen

Positional argument collection

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
Say I have an array of values, arbitrary length, that I want to pass as the arguments to a method. For example, with this: positionalArgs = ['foo', 'bar', 42]; // this varies, may be any length I want to make this call: SomeComponent.someMethod('foo', 'bar', 42); Is there a positional equiva

Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?

2010-10-06 Thread enigment
At work we use AccuRev, which is expensive, and flawed, but on the whole really great. It has a stream inheritance model that means changes in an earlier release stream automatically flow to later releases unless there are changes to the same file there already. Also has integrated issue tracking,

RE: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?

2010-10-06 Thread Andrew Scott
It also depends on your SDLC, and workflow for releases as well. I use SVN Externals for common code across applications as well, and the one thing that I do is have only a stable release structure in SVN for any application. This means that a developer can code, make changes to all the heart's

Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Christensen
It's a really good question, and one that I have no real good answer for. I think if you are used to working on a common set of files, you do things a little bit differently than when you have your own copy. We rarely have the issue of people leaving broken files, not in the least because your

Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?

2010-10-06 Thread Kym Kovan
On 6/10/2010 6:59 PM, Michael Christensen wrote: > > Thank you all for the great answers. > > I would like to throw a (potential) monkey wrench into the situation by > saying, that we develop on a common set of files. > > How does that play into things? If that is the case then the distributed e

Re: What version-/source control are you using (if any)?

2010-10-06 Thread Michael Christensen
Thank you all for the great answers. I would like to throw a (potential) monkey wrench into the situation by saying, that we develop on a common set of files. How does that play into things? Once again thanks for your time.