Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Justin Scott
100% of the time this little bit of regex has served me well until now. ^[\w\.-]{1,}\@([\da-zA-Z-]{1,}\.){1,}[\da-zA-Z-]+$ Is there a reason you're not using the built in isValid(email, variable) function instead of a regex? -Justin

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Matt Quackenbush
Pretty sure isValid() incorrectly flags emails with apostrophes as invalid. There are two or three bugs with isValid() and emails. On Feb 24, 2013 7:05 AM, Justin Scott leviat...@darktech.org wrote: 100% of the time this little bit of regex has served me well until now.

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Russ Michaels
Still? Regards Russ Michaels www.michaels.me.uk www.cfmldeveloper.com - Free CFML hosting for developers www.cfsearch.com - CF search engine On Feb 24, 2013 3:24 PM, Matt Quackenbush quackfu...@gmail.com wrote: Pretty sure isValid() incorrectly flags emails with apostrophes as invalid. There

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Adam Cameron
This seems to work, no? No. It doesn't allow for quite a number of completely legit characters, notably the + sign (which is very common), amongst others. That said, this is the fault of the original regex, not your fix for it. My feedback on this got too long for a response here, so I wrote

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Justin Scott
Pretty sure isValid() incorrectly flags emails with apostrophes as invalid. Nope, at least not with CF9 (checked last night before I posted). There are two or three bugs with isValid() and emails. I was about to ask if anyone had details on where isValid() might fail on e-mail addresses when

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread .jonah
I take issue! ;) Kevin simply asked to his regex working with an apostrophie. My answer did that. He didn't ask for the be-all-end-all of email validators. Now, as to the rest of your comment and blog post, I'm in agreement. It's rarely done correctly. (Not accounting for plus addressing

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread .jonah
Something tangential to keep in mind is BE CONSISTENT. I've come across numerous instances out there where different features on a site don't have the same validation. For example, the account creation process might accept an email address with a plus sign in it, but the password reset

EXF Photo Information

2013-02-24 Thread Jenny Gavin-Wear
Hi all, I am still using CF7 and I'm about to put together a site for a photographer. I don't really want to spend a fortune upgrading CF, so I am wondering if there is anything I can use to read in EXIF information? If this isn't possible with CF, perhaps it could be done with Railo? I'd

Re: EXF Photo Information

2013-02-24 Thread AJ Mercer
you can try CFIMAGE action=info https://github.com/getrailo/railo/wiki/Documentation:4_0:Tags:cfimage You can download and test out quickly with Railo Express http://www.getrailo.org/index.cfm/download/ On 25 February 2013 10:34, Jenny Gavin-Wear jenn...@fasttrackonline.co.ukwrote:

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread Adam Cameron
Absolutely mate. I did make sure to point that out: That said, this is the fault of the original regex, not your fix for it. (Yes, I did see the smiley too though ;-) On 25 February 2013 15:00, .jonah jonah@creori.com wrote: I take issue! ;) Kevin simply asked to his regex working

Re: EXF Photo Information

2013-02-24 Thread Paul Hastings
On 2/25/2013 9:34 AM, Jenny Gavin-Wear wrote: I am still using CF7 and I'm about to put together a site for a photographer. I don't really want to spend a fortune upgrading CF, so I am wondering if there is anything I can use to read in EXIF information? even if you upgraded not sure you'd

Re: Apostrophes in email addresses

2013-02-24 Thread .jonah
And you know what, I glossed over that sentence before replying. :O On 2/24/13 8:06 PM, Adam Cameron wrote: Absolutely mate. I did make sure to point that out: That said, this is the fault of the original regex, not your fix for it. (Yes, I did see the smiley too though ;-) On 25