Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster than
forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
cfset xsearch = ''
cfloop list='#theModels#' index='i'
cfset xsearch = xsearchor searchterm like '%#i#%'
/cfloop
cfif listlen(
Take the following query. Is there a more efficient way to handle the where
clause? Specifically, the last two 'and' statements that loop through two
different lists, one that includes results and one that excludes results.
Thanks, Che
select searchterm, searchtype, numresults, timestamp
from
Why not perform your cflooping outside the SQL. This is much faster than
forcing the query to manage the loop parsing and excution:
cfset xsearch = ''
cfloop list='#theModels#' index='i'
cfset xsearch = xsearchor searchterm like '%#i#%'
/cfloop
cfif listlen(
Building the loop in or out of the CFQUERY tag makes no difference in
performance.
My experience is that performance can be impacted slightly based on number of
users, number of terms, and complexity of the query as a result of the
parameters to be evaluated. We have found better overall
4 matches
Mail list logo
