Perhaps you'd want to hide the connection details for security reasons.
There may even be a performance benefit.
However, if you were to use a COM object, you'd have to use ADO; you
probably couldn't spit the results back as a native CF query.
--
Billy Cravens
HR Web Development, Sabre
Why ... n-tier development. Typically 3 tiers: presentation, business logic
and backend processing. And the COM component is the middle tier ...
enforcing business rules. ASP/CF acts as the presentation tier with T-SQL as
the third tier.
Why n-tier development ... because of scalability,
great response.
I want to implement a working example to learn from. Any suggestions as to
where to get a working database example?
Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (WOT) Sample code for COM object wrappers for Stored
(WOT) Sample code for COM object wrappers for Stored Procedures
not sure if I am using the right lingo, but I am interested in seeing a
working example of database integration for a web site using a com object as
a wrapper for a stored procedure. ASP and Cold Fusion sample ASP code
Can I ask why you would want to use a COM object to access a Stored Procedure instead
of just calling the procedure directly?
I am just curious...
--
Clint Tredway
www.factorxsoftware.com
--
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get
seen the code, I may have misunderstood what he was telling me.
I was going to recreate the approach so I could learn it.
e
From: "Clint Tredway" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (WOT) Sample code for COM object wrappers for Stored Procedures
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:17:24 -0500
Can I a
6 matches
Mail list logo