Depending on what you are doing with this data, seems to me that this should
be done in the front end and not the db. So get your data in the original
format:
USER, CODE
rick,AL
rick,FR
rick,TR
rick,HS
joe,AL
joe,FU
Bob,FM
And then use cfoutput with query and group (a very rough output here):
Just read the original post properly - please ignore me.
Dominic
2009/11/15 Dominic Watson watson.domi...@googlemail.com
Depending on what you are doing with this data, seems to me that this
should be done in the front end and not the db. So get your data in the
original format:
USER,
You wrote a pivot query without using pivot. BTW, the aggregate for the pivot
query can be Count().
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:rick.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 4:19 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: (ot) SQL Question - flattening data
From
I'm trying to flatten out some data using only SQL we currently
have a mainframe job that produces a datafeed for me uses cobol to
do the work of looping through all the entities and putting up to 5
record types in 5 record type fields in the output file. I'm trying
to figure out a way
X
Crosstab queries can be a little hairy to build. IMHO, go with the cursors.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:rick.r...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:41 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: (ot) SQL Question - flattening data
I'm
]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 1:11 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: (ot) SQL Question - flattening data
Is there a particular reason to return them in this format? I would
think that the straight query output would be simpler to work with.
However, you can accomplish this either by using cursors
From the documentation, pivot tables seem to require aggregate
functions... The generic description would seem to work but the
examples make it difficult to see how.
But... I figured out a solution! Using SQL Server's row_number() over
(partition by XXX order by XXX) I can make a subquery that
7 matches
Mail list logo
