: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: 3 Tier Security
I am hoping someone can help me out with this. Maybe I just
can't see how it would work..but anyways we have apps
that are going to be accessible outside our firewall
]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: 3 Tier Security
I am hoping someone can help me out with this. Maybe I just can't see how
it would work..but anyways we have apps that are going to be accessible
outside our firewall. We currently have a set-up like
]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: 3 Tier Security
That was my thought, if they get in an extra layer will only delay them
not stop them. The thing is this is extremely private data that if it were
to get out would cause the hospital a great deal
-
From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: 3 Tier Security
I am hoping someone can help me out with this. Maybe I just can't see how
it would work..but anyways we have apps that are going to be accessible
outside our
they cannot setup a VPN like customer sites or Internet Cafes'.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: 3 Tier Security
That was my thought, if they get in an extra layer will only delay them
I am doing exactly that, seems like a good way of going about it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: 3 Tier Security
Yes, this is much more secure than most people.
I would start
I am hoping someone can help me out with this. Maybe I just can't see how it would
work..but anyways we have apps that are going to be accessible outside our
firewall. We currently have a set-up like this.
Webserver is in dmz with the ports http/https accessible to the outside world.
Just off the top of my head, some kind of database abstraction level
might be what they are thinking. Currently you send SQL straight to
the webserver, which if the web server is compromised would let a
hacker send arbitrary sql statements to the sql server. With an API in
the middle using COM, a
How about a Class 2 force field around the servers
heh...
The way u have it set up now is wy more secure than most people have it.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: 3 Tier Security
Developer
-Network / Web Server Administrator
Vivid Media
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vividmedia.com
608.270.9770
-Original Message-
From: Phoeun Pha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: 3 Tier Security
How about a Class 2 force field
W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: 3 Tier Security
Yes, this is much more secure than most people.
I would start with securing the cf/webserver. A correctly secured
webserver
is very hard to hack into.
Here is an idea
a
difference in licensing cost.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: 3 Tier Security
I am hoping someone can help me out with this. Maybe I just
can't see how it would work
12 matches
Mail list logo