Re: Using Application.cfc has decreased performance

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:28:36 -0400, Stavros Tekes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have replaced Application.cfm in an old application of mine with Application.cfc. The events set there are OnRequestStart (checking to see if user has logged in and initializes variables in the request

Re: Using Application.cfc has decreased performance

I do not have either debugging enabled or report execution times. Both are off but the delay is there. Furthermore, on the followup that Micha did, I have the impression that on MX7, one can have either Application.cfc or Application.cfm. If both are present only Application.cfc is used. Isnt

RE: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Hi Sean, Mostly looking for observations and what might be considered best ways to leverage onRequest. Thanks, Calvin -Original Message- From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Message- From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:25:56 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, the onRequest method is quite interesting

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

You want to take a good hard read of the OnRequest (not OnRequestStart/Stop) doc... I suspect this may be of great interest to framework developers. ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support

RE: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Damon, Can you point us to that? Thanks, Calvin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:33 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII You want to take a good hard read

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

. However, for backwards compatibility reasons, I'd be suprised to see the Application.cfc stuff make it into a MX-based framework for the time being. Having to maintain two code branches doesn't seem very efficient. Regards, Dave

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Sure (BTW all-new CFMX 7 LiveDocs are also live and online): http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/1120.htm and (reference) http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/0698.htm ~| Logware

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

[Shameless Plug] I also wrote a brief blog-entry on onRequest if anyone is interested in reading a little more about it. http://steve.coldfusionjournal.com/read/1059556.htm Steve You want to take a good hard read of the OnRequest (not OnRequestStart/Stop) doc... I suspect this may be of

Application.cfc, UDF's, and includes

I'm converting a new app over to use application.cfc. Rather than load the application.cfc up with UDF's that I use regularly (I would normally dump them into application.cfm), I have created a file that contains the UDF's that I would like to include (udf_lib.cfm). I am including the file

Re: Application.cfc, UDF's, and includes

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:36:11 -0500, Pete Ruckelshaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm converting a new app over to use application.cfc. Rather than load the application.cfc up with UDF's that I use regularly (I would normally dump them into application.cfm), I have created a file that contains

RE: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Hmm, the onRequest method is quite interesting... Has anyone already tinkered with it? - Calvin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 9:53 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:25:56 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, the onRequest method is quite interesting... Has anyone already tinkered with it? Yes, I've used it extensively. Do you have some specific questions? -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox --

Re: Application.cfc, UDF's, and includes

Thanks, Sean, that did the trick. Pete ~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message:

CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

Any speculation or thoughts on how the new Application.cfc functionality might benefit the two larger frameworks? ~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

/ cfcatch type=... /cfcatch /cftry Now you can move most of that (well, all of it, really) into Application.cfc instead. Your Fusebox application itself will remain completely untouched. I suspect that Mach-II will not leverage Application.cfc for the framework itself either, at least for a while

Re: CFMX7: Application.cfc and FuseBox/MachII

of Application.cfc. Mach II is a different beast and was always designed with CF as the primary target. Ben, Hal and I talked about a 2.0 version to leverage Blackstone and Application.cfc would be an obvious feature to take advantage of except that Mach II already manages the initialization of CFC at application

<    3   4   5   6   7   8