t; > >
> > > ----- Original Message -
> > > From: "Gerald Guido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "cf-talk"
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:18:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada
> Pacific
> > > Subject: Re: Best f
> > I'm assuming you're deploying on Windows?
> >
> > -Jordan
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Gerald Guido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "cf-talk"
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:18:02 PM GMT -0
:
> G,
>
> I'm assuming you're deploying on Windows?
>
> -Jordan
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gerald Guido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "cf-talk"
> Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:18:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pac
G,
I'm assuming you're deploying on Windows?
-Jordan
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Guido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cf-talk"
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2008 2:18:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: Best free ColdFusion server?
&
>>Since both Railo and OpenBD are JEE wars it should not be any different.
Adam, you're absolutely correct .When deployed as WAR's they are the same. I
neglected to mention that. Thanx for point that out.
The Railo Server version is deployed using Resin. Apache uses mod_caucho to
connect Resin/Ra
Since both Railo and OpenBD are JEE wars it should not be any different is
Railo is doing something different that is easier please point it out
OpeanBD can do the exact same things from a deployment perspective.
Adam
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Gerald Guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
I tried openBD on my xserve and really had a hard time getting it to run right
and was a bit of a pita...
Soon as I have some spare time I am going to try to get railo up and running on
it and see how it goes. There isn't much out there on getting it to run on os x
yet so might take a bit to ge
> Although it really depends on what you're doing with it (for instance,
> if you
> need to redistribute a CF server bundled with your closed-source
> application,
> you can't use OpenBD).
>
I've not worked with OpenBD yet, but in my experience with BD in the past, and
with Railo, BD seems
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2008, Philip Kaplan wrote:
> Railo vs BlueDragon vs Smith vs ??
http://www.rachaelandtom.info/what-works-where-on-what
Although it really depends on what you're doing with it (for instance, if you
need to redistribute a CF server bundled with your closed-source application,
yo
>Yet to hear anyone talk in depth about coral web builder...
>http://www.pcaonline.com/index.cfm?DocID=10082
>
>Surprised no one from their team has stepped up. Or did I miss something?
That's because Coral Web Builder is terrible?
- It doesn't support Session, Client, Application nor Server scop
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Philip Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
WASRailo vs BlueDragon vs Smith vs ??
>
> http://www.smithproject.org/
> http://www.newatlanta.com/bluedragon/
> http://www.railo.ch/
>
>
Yet to hear anyone talk in depth about coral web builder...
http://www.pcaonline.com/in
I guess I will go first then.
The answer is: "It depends".
Like Adam pointed out both of them are mature and very capable engines. Both
have their stronger/weaker points, it is just matters what you are looking
for. My over all impression is that those more comfortable in a J2EE
environment may f
lol Adam. What money? Last I checked both OpenBD was free. You been
passing Alan some money on the side?
BTW, URL for OpenBD is as follows (since it wasn't included in previous
post):
http://www.openbluedragon.org/
Warm regards,
Jordan Michaels
Vivio Technologies
http://www.viviotech.net/
Open B
>They're also both forgien so either way your money if going over seas ;)
Unless you happen to be half-Swiss half-Scottish.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Tria
Where is OpenBD based out of?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both are capable engines. Right now I'd say Railo has a better
> compatibility
> with ColdFusion 8.0 but OpenBD is improving in that area. They both take
> different routes to deliver the engin
Both are capable engines. Right now I'd say Railo has a better compatibility
with ColdFusion 8.0 but OpenBD is improving in that area. They both take
different routes to deliver the engines capabilities. Both are very capable
engines with a wealth of support from inside and outside of the ColdFusio
>Railo vs BlueDragon vs Smith vs ??
Smith doesn't have anywhere near enough compatibility with CF, nor any
distinguishing features to set it apart - it would need a lot of work before
I'd consider it worth considering/comparing.
Railo vs OpenBD is probably going to end up in the same vein as t
Hehe.
I figured this has been discussed to death on cf-talk, but not since I've
been a subscriber.
Can someone give me a Cliff's Notes version?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gerald Guido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I am going to make some popcorn
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Phi
I am going to make some popcorn
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Philip Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Railo vs BlueDragon vs Smith vs ??
>
> http://www.smithproject.org/
> http://www.newatlanta.com/bluedragon/
> http://www.railo.ch/
>
>
>
~~
Railo vs BlueDragon vs Smith vs ??
http://www.smithproject.org/
http://www.newatlanta.com/bluedragon/
http://www.railo.ch/
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
20 matches
Mail list logo
