> We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
>
While that is certainly one difference between BlueDragon and
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
6.1's availability aroun
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:56 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
> > We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
> choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
> a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
:nods
That's one of the things that h
Matt wrote:
>> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
>> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvantages?
-dc
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> >> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
> >> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
>
> Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvantages?
The cost advantage is even large
> Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main
> advantages/disadvantages?
>
That is an interesting question and partially why I brought it up. I'm
not sure that I know all the advantages and disadvantages. I could
certainly start listing things off the top of my head, but I don't know
that w
I was hoping to present a "Flex" or Central presentation at the next meeting
on December 10. Of course I was one of the many not accepted to the beta and
the NDA would no doubt be problematic.
Instead I have chosed to present BlueDragon 6.1 (beta). We need to keep CFML
alive and BlueDragon will go
6 matches
Mail list logo
