RE: CF + COM

2002-11-21 Thread Chris Alvarado
Guys Interactive, Inc. http://www.4guys.com "We create websites that make you a hero." -Original Message- From: jon hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF + COM Why not use their new XML API? The ShipAPI stuff

Re: CF + COM

2002-11-21 Thread jon hall
Why not use their new XML API? The ShipAPI stuff is really nasty imho. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, November 21, 2002, 11:59:32 AM, you wrote: CA> Im not using FedEX's Java API because CA> 1) We are not using CFMX as of yet and 2) because my knowledge of Java CA> is extremely li

RE: CF + COM

2002-11-21 Thread Chris Alvarado
guage. -chris.alvarado [ application developer ] 4 Guys Interactive, Inc. http://www.4guys.com "We create websites that make you a hero." -Original Message- From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:11 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF +

RE: CF + COM

2002-11-21 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
oomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Chris Alvarado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 10:29 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF + COM Hello all, Currently working on a cold fusion component to work with the FedEX API for one

CF + COM

2002-11-21 Thread Chris Alvarado
Hello all, Currently working on a cold fusion component to work with the FedEX API for one or our clients and I was curious to know if anyone knows of any good sites that focus on working with COM using CF? I am aware of cfcomet, im just looking for general dos / donts and tips, for stuff as simp

CF COM site

2000-11-22 Thread Eric Fickes
Hello all, For those who haven't already seen this site, check it out. Especially is you use or have tries to use COM objects with CF. http://www.cfcomet.com/cfcomet/ I was going to post this link to the list a while back when someone was talking about creating WORD documents from CF. You can

RE: CF & COM

2000-07-13 Thread Campbell Morton
Steve Bernard wrote: >I'm not sure exactly what you mean by registering the component with NT's >Scheduler but, if you mean that you have the component started by the >Scheduler Service be aware that the component will be running under the >System Account. This will give the component, and thereby

RE: CF & COM

2000-07-13 Thread Steve Bernard
calling it, extremely powerful rights on the local machine. I'd be careful if you are in a multi-user development environment. Steve -Original Message- From: Campbell Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 9:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CF & C

RE: CF & COM

2000-07-13 Thread Zachary Bedell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To the best of my knowledge (and COM is my friend, so I think this is accurate), you can't possibly have a .exe component run inproc. Under Windoze, ALL EXEs run as their own process and ALL DLLs run in somebody else's process. As far as I know,

CF & COM

2000-07-12 Thread Campbell Morton
Hi There, I'm currently having trouble interfacing with a COM object on CF4.0.1/NT4 SP6/IIS4. This is a third party component - written to work with an existing product written in ASP (bah!). I am trying to integrate this component with a new CF app. My code: - - Error message: - C